>>185131
Why did you falsely claim to be a minor in this >>184667 post?
And why did you claim in >>185054 as well as in the post that I'm currently replying to that the nude that was posted was of you and was cp when you of course knew that it was in fact not a photo of you at all and that there was therefore no reason to believe, and nothing to indicate, that it was in any way illicit, which, in fact, it was not?

By the way, I know that you had your friends brigade the thread/board as well.