>>189
>Because it only proves that these things happen which I never said they didn't, not the context behind them or how they relate to the Police as a whole, again you are essentially using the actions of one black man to paint all of them.
Again you shift blame away from the police and on to the victim all the while focusing on a singular case and ignoring the others.
>our evidence proves nothing and often goes country to what you yourself are saying, like when you are saying how bad the police are because of shooting a news crew with rubber bullets, yet the same article notes he was punished for it but of course you ignore that.
Reassignment isn't the same as being properly punished especially since the police are investigating themselves which often means no consequences will be faced. At worst the officer is "fired" and ends ups at a police department in a separate city. Another tactic they use to feign legitimacy is to have the officer in question go on paid leave while they do their "investigating". Cops almost always face no criminal charges or the end of their careers.
>Good, maybe you will have some time to reflect on this and realise that you need to look at the world as it and not just as it appears thought your narrow lenses.
Bruh