>>58585
Maybe I'll give it a try someday too.

Most people who praise the game really do not have anything to praise about it other than simply "It has so much content!" Because just having a lot of content automatically makes something good, quality of said content is irrelevant, right? Quantity over quality, whats that?
Although, at the same time, if you're someone who exclusively plays modern major western releases, I can kinda understand where they're coming from, as the vast majority of those are lacking in both quality AND quantity of content, so clearly BG3 only lacking in the quality makes it good.