>>42038
(continued, server seems to be hiccuping)
Trump, the populist in the mind of his base, not the histrion in the palms of the Blue techno-judeo establishment, controlled almost nothing in "his" government, he had no powerful allies (the histrion did, on the "other" side), not in academia, not in the media, not in the banks, not in technocapital or the Silicon Slit, not in military, not in foreign powers... What did he "have"? He "had" the numerous maga crowd and the Qtard cultists. And he "had" the symbolic, and misplaced and deluded, hope of the vilified white middle USA. And for a while, up to early 2017, for a whole 4 months of his presidency lol, he tentatively "had" the hopes of an assorted bunch of US and international shitposters. This is not how a coup d'etat is carried out. Suggesting it is pure guile, or a joke. How about co-opting remote voting procedures for "non-fraudulent election fraud"? Is that a "coup"? No need to answer.
As I said I wasn't talking only about this impromptu congress tour, but also the period during and after the nigger topics riots. And I told you what is the point: "show of strength". Which is all that the rally and trespassing really could have been. The election was lost, fixed, stolen, whatever. They weren't going to get it back, Drumptard and Qtard delusions notwithstanding. But they still have to live through the coming re-fueled cultural-marxist "regime" which poses the not insignificant risk of continuing in its path of effectively abolishing or disabling USA's 1st and 2nd constitution amendment. The point is then simply to increase pressure and risk of the coming govt, to show it and the other half of the population that stakes are high in case they decide to go too crazy, and also to increase confidence and integration among their own.
>they can't even start a civil war
More nonsense. Civil wars generally don't have a definite start, no declarations and such. There is a conflict and it grows out of control. It is usually a gradient. But ultimately I do believe that there is no real chance for a civil war. I think USians don't have the spirit and spine and heart needed to fight and suffer what will inescapably be a long and bloody struggle against a brutal and all-powerful enemy (I would imagine Ireland-like situation but far worse for the "guerrilla/native insurgents", unless there is a benefitial split in military personnel and infrastructure). Life is too comfortable, they are too affluent, too hedonistic, too distracted. They are not desperate enough.
>Accelerationists are braindead idiots.
Non sequitur. Acceleration would be something like voting Foo while under the conviction that he will further ruin the nation/country, with the pretext that any other choice at best delays the inevitable. Such thing is indeed retarded. It is also unrelated to what I was discussing.