UK granted USA's appeal on the trial for the extradition of Assange. This was appealed in turn, to the supreme court, but I have read that considering the judge involved in the appeal and the composition of the supreme court, it doesn't seem likely to succeed
So:
>the sexual allegations (not even charges just slander) was hogwash intended to grab him sweden, a country with a 100% record of extradition to usa, the useful bitch "just wanted him to take an std test"
>for years US denied having served a secret extradition request, they lied
>UN resolution says he is unlawfully detained and should be released and compensated: crickets
>the icelandic witness that claimed he was a hacker rather than a publisher is a fraudster and pederast convict who admitted to providing false testimony (!)
>US spied on his legal counselors and meetings via a private surveillance company (!)
>the state that practices extrajudicial kidnappings ("rendition") and torture ("special procedures") promises all will be fine
>after they already planned to kidnap or assassinate him (!!!)
>7+ years of detention in various forms for publishing only truth
I have thought that the destruction of this guy's work and life will later be seen as a pivot point in the history of the US empire