>>38
Well there's always the "tyranny of the majority" thing, you're right. I'm going to take the road that maximizes freedom and minimizes constraints. When it comes to things that don't affect other anons then that's what we can hold direct democratic consensus for. Is that fine?

It's always been my opinion that paternalism is patronizing and in most cases the means of an authority figure to take a power trip. However I don't consider it "forcing" people to be free but rather choosing not to intervene with them. I feel the same way about imageboards. So I won't censor others' free speech even if there's a majority consensus they should be censored.