>>6362
>Who said anything about planning?
I´ve said mostly this because you were exposing here and I quote:

>>6360
>who are all part of an online imageboard communist international with GETchan, /leftypol/ and others?
which implies that you are exposing them as they are all united for a single ideology uniformly. This post already gives an idea that you either come from /mlpol/ or you are ideologically (in the political sense) that you are disenchanted with the mentality/idiosyncrasy of those places.

>I just want this board to not be cancerous, whether politically cancerous or normalfag cancerous.
well, that depends on what you want to do first over here.