Anon 12/02/2020 (Wed) 10:49:19 No.6976 del
(943.40 KB 1281x971 not again.png)
>>6961
>that whole first two walls of text

I did not even read this, I'm not reading a longform response to a joke.
If the big bold red lettering didn't get the point across, it was a joke!
you know they say not being able to understand humor is a sign of autism...
>all your other points.
There isn't really much for me to respond here other than thanks for agreeing with me. I guess that ends the argument.

>>6962
>now, I know that you were tired and that you have considered that I was trying to discourage you without giving you much background history before. It´s true that I jumped onto your thesis without letting you much space like >>6960 has pointed out.
>In exchange, I am letting you to have a time in order to see your own post calmly, read it again with all the time that you need and reconsider what you have stated... because in the figurative sense (for a debate), if I had to illustrate what has happened with these words of yours has gone like this:
>What you have done here is that you held a 44.Magnum, you gave it to me with the magazine loaded, without the safe mode and you left it in my hand in a position where I only have to use my finger to pull the trigger (without doing anything coming from my part). On top of that, you are begging to me to shoot at your head and the other two >>6955 and especially >>6952 have predicted the possible terrible fate by offering to you a couple of lifesavers before I do anything.
>It blows my mind how in a fairly reasonable post, you have decided to throw it all away in the semantics department (with very few lines which is outstanding to say the least) and I seriously don´t want to do this. The other posts will sound like a joke if you decide to stay convinced with your own assessment by resorting to this argument alone.
>I am not saying this because I am offended (far from it even, I don´t care about what you think about me honestly, I said it here >>6948) but in terms of a debate, you aren´t exactly in a very convenient position to be honest.
>I seriously recommend that you analyze what you have just posted over here (with a laid back manner, don´t rush the answer) and see how it can possibly pan out by exposing that alone but don´t stay there because right now, the results could backfire dramatically on you.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.