>>8117
>In fact, I think that it´s been the first time in which I have heard about Game Jolt
To be honest I never heard about it until now either so we are in the same boat here.
And I pretty much agree with the rest of the post.

>>8118
>well, unless that one sets up alarms in the way that mobile or message notifications work
That's something we could do actually, that's what I meant by the "actions" beside other things, the reader would have some built-in actions like partial archival, or crawling of included links.
But the "main" part would be executing given commands on detected event, which means it could do anything, from sending emails to literally anything and all depending on which level of "danger" we would detect.
If it was made portable enough we could even have version running directly on android with said notifications.
>I highly doubt that anything will beat the usual method of reporting it manually by opening a thread on /mlp/ or something that serves as a bait for seeking the attention to those happenings in a public manner.
Well, my original idea would be that it would inform (You) based on other people making fuzz about it -> making it harder to miss. So basically just tell you that someone opened a thread that may indicate problems.

It's really just glorified RSS reader in the original idea, that's why I bringed it up, I'm not sure if it is worth it and more opinions will definitely help.

>Perhaps it´s not about setting up a notification system because that doesn't solve the actual root of the problem. What needs to be fixed are adults that handle sites like these, we need professionals, not incompetents that copy the messy policies that ruined Tumblr
Well I can't disagree on that, but in the end, these people can (and will probably still do) such things. And even if it