>>9070
>yiff.party
Didn't see that here:
https://iwiftp.yerf.org/Furry/Website%20archive/

>>9072
>The python script I made and am using to index it definitely downloads way less than ipfs's built-in method (I'm pretty sure this is still the case)
Dammit, I guess an update to kubo broke the minimal-download part of this:
https://gothub.projectsegfau.lt/ProximaNova/ipfs-ls-r/blob/main/ipfs-ls-r.py

That python script worked in the related software of a 64-bit computer, but it isn't working identically in the software of a 32-bit computer (either due to a kubo ipfs update or something else). Who cares? This matter for indexing multi-terabyte IPFS folders without having to download multiple terabytes. In the past I could almost certainly completely index a multi-TB IPFS folder and only download like <1GB from that whole process by using that .py file.

NSFW image from
>ipfs://bafybeifemum5o7icqdt4xtvgddobsmtc6u7pnfxiq7ij5z3bw6o433coza/files/zonkpunch/7678830-e262-Twilight_Sparkle.jpg
Nearby files in that folder which are maybe online in a high-latency way:
>http://bafybeifemum5o7icqdt4xtvgddobsmtc6u7pnfxiq7ij5z3bw6o433coza.ipfs.localhost:48084/files/zonkpunch/7678830-0196-Flash.zip
>http://bafybeifemum5o7icqdt4xtvgddobsmtc6u7pnfxiq7ij5z3bw6o433coza.ipfs.localhost:48084/files/zonkpunch/7678830-46f1-Animation.zip