>>11165
>>11167

no hard correlation, just quoting some apt Q posts:

Q#3414
> Only Anons can fully appreciate the continued 'validation(s)/confirmation(s) thru covert' (series of mathematically impossible coincidences) means in order to maintain structural integrity.

Q#2537
> How many coincidences before mathematically impossible?
> 68–95–99.7 rule


So... how many coincidences, anons?