>>20674
Please read more carefully. I'm talking about logging the length of each bread, not evaluating the content of the breads.

Not that it matters but 4 of those"crap" posts are mine (#2,3,4, 7; 5 is a response to 2.

2 points out a significant relationship
3 one is a correction
4 is a dig responding to an anon critique
7 is an attempt to jog anons' memories, in hopes of a making breakthrough on a difficult dig
5 is response to an anon trying to solve the CA_J question.
Do you even know what this dig is about? Find out by searching in qresear.ch.

>>20675
do you even know what this dig is about, anon?