>>5538
>who may pose a threat to the statu quo
Forgot to mention that the (((elites))) are also a threat to the "status quo" that is literally their "origin story"
>hurr durr evil monarch hurr durr evil pope am such a rich merchant such smart too I deserve to be king hurrrrrrr me build clubhouse me make rebellions me subvert populations me smart truly the one true god
So maybe that I pointed this out on the "contracts" that they "claim" they "rule by" it sorta self destructed???

I know how retarded I wrote down how this is but they are not "accepted as rulers" and hiding a bunch of symbols here and there and saying that makes u a slave for looking at it is childish as hell and it's not really a reliable "claim for rulership".


>because the statu quo is not exactly pro-human.
Tell it to them!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nUQ1Y8nPz0Q [Embed]