/l/ - The Lounge

Non board-specific discussion

[Make a Post]
[X]




Lf Model Threads Nanonymous No.16318 (A)[D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>16389 >>16406 >>16429
File: c6a5486816d30b56d233e3cac9411e6d682a31d25719b224f235bfbbdcbd6fa0.jpg (dl) (176.25 KiB)
Draw fag here. Can you guys help me find a site with cool korean models/japanese models? ffs, don't post cp, plz, or share links to cp. I'm just a draw fag not a pedo.

Thank you good people of nanochan,

nanon

Nanonymous No.16319 [D]
Picture related. I have a very specific pose I'm looking for, and I will use my imagination to add her into an computer room environment, going for a comfy feel, dim lamps and book shelf in the background. Her pose ideally in on her bed, laying on her side, with her head supported with her hand, she will be using a laptop, it will be comfy.

Nanonymous No.16326 [D]
LS models thread?

Nanonymous No.16327 [D]
never played runescape^

Nanonymous No.16382 [D]
^no u
I did but very little

Nanonymous No.16389 [D] >>16795
>>16318
Look for ジュニアアイドル on your favourite search engine.

Nanonymous No.16406 [D]
>>16318
What's an Lf model? Loli fuck model?

Nanonymous No.16429 [D]
>>16318
From the background kanji, I'm pretty sure that's 篠崎愛.

Nanonymous No.16500 [D]
Super pose book p268 ...IIRC.
Don't have link. Only autism.Was on a Mega. Try torrent. There are jap pose DVDs for manga draw fag.

Nanonymous No.16776 [D] >>16779
>What's an Lf model
looking for u dumb fuck

Nanonymous No.16779 [D][U][F]
File: 7d407f188aade8e7fca11167dd85d02773bc6b70e3b39dca375eb95c7610dbfe.png (dl) (558.79 KiB)
>>16776

Nanonymous No.16782 [D] >>16787
Ah yes, """references""". Do you wear the beret while you beat off?

Nanonymous No.16787 [D]
>>16782
Counter-sage

Nanonymous No.16788 [D] >>16790
This is an asukafag race-mixing bait thread designed to get White men to masturbate to Asian women. Sage and repot.

Nanonymous No.16790 [D]
>>16788
Counter-sage

Nanonymous No.16795 [D] >>16838
>>16389
no anon thats underage. this whole thread is irrelevant. sage sage sage.

Nanonymous No.16838 [D]
>>16795
>implying that's bad