/meta/ - Board Meta

[Make a Post]
[X]





/sci/ Board Creation Nanonymous No.3452 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>3455 >>5791
File: 2c535a26fc51a31b2305d17478c88965f63e3410dbb4e8a101776b4564a07f21.png (dl) (1.07 MiB)

What do nanons and Hapase think about the creation of a science board? Net goods, net bads? What do you think?

Nanonymous No.3453 [D] >>3455 >>3465

The whole website is dead, I bet hapase doesn't even look at it anymore. Maybe hapase stopped posting and that's why the site is so dead.

Nanonymous No.3454 [D][U][F]
File: 6645320021fffd797945d8a94ac88d7117649527cf706d70ffe81f2a0bb682fe.jpg (dl) (353.71 KiB)

I don't think anything on the subject.
I'm clearly not educated enough for any /sci/ stuff.

Nanonymous No.3455 [D]

>>3452
I would love a /sci/ board, but probably hapase response will be just make a /sci/ thread.
>>3453
nano is not that dead, look at the logs.

Nanonymous No.3459 [D]

It's not dead, it just lacks the army of shills that 4/8 have.

Nanonymous No.3460 [D][U][F]
File: 1be42a9c49cfe323d462593653e138520a4ee82215cb1aadf8311e8b91891a74.jpg (dl) (2.80 MiB)

Why the fuck do you need a board nigger? Just post it on /l/.

Nanonymous No.3464 [D]

/o/ was a bad idea and /sci/ will be too

Nanonymous No.3465 [D]

I don't think I would use it, I already feel like idiot when I read hardware threads.
>>3453
No, I stopped posting when cancer was at its record. As a result whole site suffered when remaining 20% of quality posters left, thus stopping creating 80% of quality threads (Pareto Principle). Maybe hapase spam was a way to attract traffic? We will never know.

Nanonymous No.5781 [D]
The Pareto Principle states that it takes roughly 20% of the effort to finish 80% of the task at hand. Not that 20% of the group contribute to 80% of the work. That's just shit management.

Nanonymous No.5785 [D] >>5787
well how many people talk science on nano? would another board be justified?

Nanonymous No.5787 [D] >>5788
>>5785
EXACTLY.

ALTHOUGH, I MUST SAY, IN CAPS BECAUSE II LIKE TO YELL, LOUDLY, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

THAT - wait shit I might be on something I wonder - AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA =
okay so
fuck where was I

SCHIZO POSTING



Okary so um like some dudes or fake dudes, I mean "women" might argue that like (trans)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAO"EIM

MIGHT FUCKING ARGUE

shit thinking is hard

THAT...um.........
o YEAH! THAT IF THE Pseudo-Science Board WAS actually not not fucking created, that um
fuck
that uhhhhhh
um
People might post on that topc for the fuck of it?

When I FUCKING PUT IT THAT FUCKING WAY IT DOESN'T SOUND SO FINGER LICKIN' GOOD


YOU BE THE JUDGE NAANOOONS

you are probably A FUCKING RACOON ANYWAY

Nanonymous No.5788 [D] >>5792
>>5787
i'm not sure what you mean. the point i was making was that some conversations on nanochan contain scientific topics regardless of whether there is a board for it. at this point there isn't too many explicit science discussion for an exclusive board.

Nanonymous No.5791 [D]
>>3452
What we can do for now is create STEM content on /l/, if we get at least 3 of these threads on the top of overboard we might have a chance.

Nanonymous No.5792 [D][U][F]
File: 88834d2dfc9dfcfaba4c17998df51a33c17f2233c0b93be1d8c34a94eea9ed43.jpg (dl) (462.38 KiB)
>>5788
You may be pic related.