The US is running out of bombs — and it may soon struggle to make more
Description: America's best weapons now rely on parts from an increasingly shrinking industrial base — and in some cases, is totally reliant on Chinese-made materials.
Keywords: american bombs, munitions, defense industrial base, america industrial base, china war, china mateiral, Dechlorange Plus-25, munition shortage, Dimeryl Diisocyanate, Ammonium Perchlorate, mackenzie eaglen, Industrial Capabilities report, Office of Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy
Date: 2018-05-22T17:09:47Z

archive.today webpage capture | Saved from |
history |
| 22 May 2018 17:09:47 UTC
All snapshots | from host www.defensenews.com
Webpage Screenshot
share download .zip report error or abuse | short link long link markdown html code <a href="http://archive.today/nFBmK"> <img style="width:300px;height:200px;background-color:white" src="https://archive.fo/nFBmK/c4a031338f61237544031fa7e8243a1a9ac29aa4/scr.png"><br> The US is running out of bombs — and it may soon struggle to make more<br> archived 22 May 2018 17:09:47 UTC </a> wiki code {{cite web | title = The US is running out of bombs — and it may soon struggle to make more | url = https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2018/05/22/the-us-is-running-out-of-bombs-and-it-may-soon-struggle-to-make-more/ | date = 2018-05-22 | archiveurl = http://archive.today/nFBmK | archivedate = 2018-05-22 }}

# This page was last archived 3 hours ago

If this snapshot looks obsolete you can again
SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.

- Air
- Land
- Naval
- Pentagon
- Congress 
- Cyber
- C4ISR
- Space
- Training & Sim
- Unmanned
- Global 
- Industry 
- Interviews
- 2017 Top 100 Companies
- Outlook
- Thought Leadership 
- TV/Video 
- Newsletters
- Early Bird Brief
- © 2018 Sightline Media Group

- Budget

- Asia Pacific
- Europe
- Mideast Africa
- The Americas

- TechWatch

- Opinion
- White papers
- Special Multimedia Reports
- Digital Show Dailies
- E-Books

- Defense News Weekly

## Pentagon

# The US is running out of bombs — and it may soon struggle to make more

By: Aaron Mehta  1 hour ago
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Facebook
Share to Twitter
Share to Google+
Share to Email
Share to More
6

#### Key suppliers for weapons such as the AIM-120 advanced medium-range air-to-air missile are fleeing the defense-industrial base, which could have an impact on the ability of America to wage war in the future. (R. Nial Bradshaw/U.S. Air Force)

WASHINGTON ― The Pentagon plans to invest more than $20 billion in munitions in its next budget. But whether the industrial base will be there to support such massive buys in the future is up in the air — at a time when America is expanding munitions at increasingly intense rates.
The annual Industrial Capabilities report, put out by the Pentagon’s Office of Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy, has concluded that the industrial base of the munitions sector is particularly strained, something the report blames on the start-and-stop nature of munitions procurement over the last 20 years, as well as the lack of new designs being internally developed.
Some suppliers have dropped out entirely, leaving no option for replacing vital materials. Other key suppliers are foreign-owned, with no indigenous capability to produce vital parts and materials ― setting up the risk that a conflict with China could rely on Chinese-made parts.
RELATED: America’s industrial base is at risk, and the military may feel the consequences
And the military’s desire to tinker with existing designs rather than create band-new weapons has left the industrial base with a lack of design experience, which means “design skills for critical components within the missile sector industrial base are at risk,” the authors write.
All this is happening as the U.S. is expanding munitions at a rapid rate. For instance, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction concluded that 1,186 munitions were dropped in that country during the first quarter of 2018 ― the highest number recorded for the first three months of the year since tracking began in 2013; that number is also more than two and a half times the amount dropped in the first quarter of 2017.
Mackenzie Eaglen, a defense expert with the American Enterprise Institute, said figures in the report line up with worries from senior military leaders over the last two years.
“This report puts a bunch of solid facts and figures, and real companies and impact, behind the anecdotal concerns of leadership,” Eaglen said, who added that the overall facts show “munitions production is then at risk.”

##### America’s critical minerals problem has gone from bad to worse

Without access to such minerals, our precision-guided missiles will not hit their targets, our aircraft and submarines will sit unfinished in depots, and our war-fighters will be left without the equipment they need to complete their missions.
By: Jeffery Green
Parts and pieces
An overall issue identified by the report is a lack of diversity in the industrial base, as well as a lack of knowledge on how to develop new systems.
“The loss of this design and production capability could result in costly delays, unanticipated expense, and a significant impact to many current and future missile programs, damaging the readiness of the Department [of Defense] and negatively impacting a foundational national defense priority by placing the ballistic missile production capability at risk,” according to the report.
While there are a pair of new projects underway ― the Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile and the Joint Air to Ground Missile ― neither is truly a new design as much as it is modernization for existing capabilities. Neither program features “significant design work,” the authors note, adding that the DoD “remains concerned that the design engineering capabilities needed for tactical and strategic missile systems may not be readily available in the absence of a long-term demand signal.”
Sign up for our Early Bird Brief
Get the defense industry's most comprehensive news and information straight to your inbox
Recaptcha requires verification.
I'm not a robot
reCAPTCHA
Privacy - Terms
Thanks for signing up!
For more newsletters click here
RELATED: The risks facing the Pentagon’s high-end electronics and radars
As to diversity in the industrial base, well ― there isn’t any, with the authors concluding that Raytheon and Lockheed Martin account for about 97 percent of the DoD’s munitions and missile procurement funding.
But while those two firms are doing well, there are concerns about sub-tier suppliers in the realm of “thermal batteries, SRMs [solid rocket motors], fuzes, jet engines, inertial measurement units (IMUs), GPS receivers, seekers, and warheads,” as well as how healthy that base will remain in the future.
Four industrial areas stand out as “high risk” areas of concern:

- Solid rocket motors. A military-only technology, SRMs are basically split between Orbital ATK and AerojetRocketdyne. However, Orbital is set to take on a broader section of this production, essentially leaving the U.S. with only one producer of this vital equipment, which the authors warn “can lead to cost increases due to lack of competition, decreases in internal research and development efforts, and risk of security of supply if a catastrophic accident should occur.”
- Thermal batteries. Used in all DoD missiles and guided munitions, there is one (unnamed) manufacturer of these technologies who controls about 80 percent of the market. Should something happen to that company, the DoD’s munitions stock could be endangered. In addition, the near monopoly means there has been a lack of investment in improving the technology.
- Fuzes. Used on all munitions, there is actually an excess of fuze capacity in the industrial base, due in part to improvements in other areas making the fuze less important. “Excess capacity limits manufacturers from being cost competitive and limits investment in improvements to fuze technologies, including sustaining a viable design engineering cadre,” the authors write.
- Small turbine engines. There are currently two companies involved in this sector, but one ― Teledyne Turbine Engines ― has announced it will be leaving the business in 2018, leaving only Williams International to supply this capability.

Overall, the authors found that of the 121 second-tier suppliers for munition capabilities, 98 percent of them were single/sole source. And of the 73 third-tier suppliers, 98 percent were also single/sole source.
America's supply of bombs and missiles may be imperiled in the future thanks to a lack of suppliers and a reliance on Chinese companies to provide key materials. (Paul Weatherman/U.S. Navy)
Material readiness?
There are also concerns about materials used in the systems. For example, the department is facing rising costs for ammonium perchlorate, used in almost all DoD missile programs. The sole producer, American Pacific, is only operating at 10-15 percent of capacity due to limited demand; as a result, there have been large increases in cost per round of chemical compound, a trend likely to continue into the 2020s.
Another example: Dechlorane Plus 25, a component in the insulation of weapons. “There is no domestic supplier for this material; the sole source is Occidental Chemical in Belgium,” the authors write. “Even more concerning is that the pre-cursor to make Dechlorane came from China. The Chinese source can no longer produce that pre-cursor and so there is now no source for Dechlorane in the world.”
And the sole producer of dimeryl diisocyanate, a key propellant ingredient used in systems like the AIM-9X and AMRAAM missiles, has informed the Pentagon it will be leaving the business shortly, leaving the DoD with “no qualified source” of the material.
The Pentagon is left to scramble to find potential replacements for these materials, which the authors optimistically conclude could be “the beginning of what could serve as a model for mitigating material obsolescence in the future.” But Eaglen thinks the issue of foreign suppliers needs to be dealt with quickly, or risk getting out of hand.
“It’s worrisome enough for a capability that is essential in hostilities that policymakers will likely want to start considering special protections and/or subsidies when needed,” she said. “I’m not sure the bell can be un-rung in the case of Chinese suppliers.
“We may be too far down the path to resurrect an authentic munitions industrial base. So then the question becomes: Now what?”
Click here to read the full report.
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Facebook
Share to Twitter
Share to Google+
Share to Email
Share to More
6
About
this
Author
About Aaron Mehta
Aaron Mehta is the Senior Pentagon Correspondent and Associate Editor for Defense News, covering policy, strategy and acquisition at the highest levels of the Department of Defense and its international partners.

##### Recommended for you

##### Around the Web

## Comments

 Close
Now Playing

##### Quick Links

 Digital Edition
 Got a Tip?
 Renew
 Webcasts
 Newsletters
 Subscribe
 Events
 Whitepapers

##### Top Headlines

How the DoD’s first-ever chief management officer plans to turn cash into military capabilities
The US is running out of bombs — and it may soon struggle to make more
America’s industrial base is at risk, and the military may feel the consequences
The risks facing the Pentagon’s high-end electronics and radars

##### Current Edition

- ##### Subscribe

- ##### Digital Edition

0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%