Sci-Hub Won't Be Blocked by US ISPs Anytime Soon - TorrentFreak
Description: A few days ago a US federal court issued a broad injunction against Sci-Hub, ordering the site's operator to pay millions in damages. On top of that, the court issued a broad injunction granting search engine and ISP blockades under certain conditions. While the order sets a precedent, Google and Comcast won't be asked to take action anytime soon.
Keywords: sci-hub, sci-hub.cc, sci-hub.io
Date: 2017-11-11T19:11:55+00:00

Breaking

# Judge Puts Brakes on Piracy Cases, Doubts Evidence Against Deceased Man

- On: 14/11/2017
- Comments: 0

# Sci-Hub Won’t Be Blocked by US ISPs Anytime Soon

- By Ernesto
- on November 11, 2017
- C: 0

News

A few days ago a US federal court issued a broad injunction against Sci-Hub, ordering the site's operator to pay millions in damages. On top of that, the court issued a broad injunction granting search engine and ISP blockades under certain conditions. While the order sets a precedent, Google and Comcast won't be asked to take action anytime soon.

Sci-Hub, often referred to as the “Pirate Bay of Science,” hasn’t had a particularly good run in US courts so far.

Following a $15 million defeat against Elsevier in June, the American Chemical Society won a default judgment of $4.8 million in copyright damages late last week.

In addition, the publisher was granted an unprecedented injunction, requiring various third-party services to stop providing access to the site.

The order specifically mentions domain registrars and hosting companies, but also search engines and ISPs, although only those who are in “active concert or participation” with the site. This order sparked fears that Google, Comcast, and others would be ordered to take action, but that’s not the case.

After the news broke ACS issued a press release clarifying that it would not go after search engines and ISPs when they are not in “active participation” with Sci-Hub. The problem is that this can be interpreted quite broadly, leaving plenty of room for uncertainty.

Luckily, ACS Director Glenn Ruskin was willing to provide more clarity. He stressed that search engines and ISPs won’t be targeted for simply linking users to Sci-Hub. Companies that host the content are a target though.

“The court’s affirmative ruling does not apply to search engines writ large, but only to those entities who have been in active concert or participation with Sci-Hub, such as websites that host ACS content stolen by Sci-Hub,” Ruskin said.

When we asked whether this means that ISPs such as Comcast are not likely to be targeted, the answer was affirmative.

“That is correct, unless the internet service provider has been in active concert or participation with SciHub. Simply linking to SciHub does not rise to be in active concert or participation,” Ruskin clarified.

The above suggests that ACS will go after domain name registrars, hosting companies, and perhaps Cloudflare, but not any further. Still, even if that’s the case there is cause for worry among several digital rights activists.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation believes that these type of orders set a dangerous precedent. The concept of “active concert or participation” should only cover close associates and co-conspirators, not everyone who provides a service to the defendant. Domain registrars and registries have often been compelled to take action in similar cases, but EFF says this goes too far.

“The courts need to limit who can be bound by orders like this one, to prevent them from being abused,” EFF Senior Staff Attorney Mitch Stoltz informs TorrentFreak.

“In particular, domain name registrars and registries shouldn’t be ordered to help take down a website because of a dispute over the site’s contents. That invites others to use the domain name system as a tool for censorship.”

News of the Sci-Hub injunction has sparked controversy and confusion in recent days, not least because Sci-hub.cc became unavailable soon after. Instead of showing the usual search box, visitors now see a “403 Forbidden” error message. On top of that, the bulletproof Tor version of the site also went offline.

The error message indicates that there’s a hosting issue. While it’s easy to conclude that the court’s injunction has something to do with this, that might not necessarily be the case. Sci-Hub’s hosting company isn’t tied to the US and has a history of protecting sites from takedown efforts.

We reached out to Sci-Hub founder Alexandra Elbakyan for comment but we’re yet to receive a response. The site hasn’t posted any relevant updates on its social media pages either.

That said, the site is far from done. In addition to the Tor domain, Sci-Hub has several other backups in place such as Sci-Hub.io and Sci-Hub.ac, which are up and running as usual.

## Tagged in:

sci-hub, sci-hub.cc, sci-hub.io

## You may also like:

# US Court Grants ISPs and Search Engine Blockade of Sci-Hub

# Tech Giants Protest Looming US Pirate Site Blocking Order

# Elsevier Complaint Shuts Down Sci-Hub Domain Name

c There are 0 comments. Add yours?

comment policy

## Sponsors

# Popular Posts

- Which VPN Services Keep You Anonymous in 2017?
- Top 10 Most Popular Torrent Sites of 2017
- What Are The Best Anonymous VPN Services?
- 5 Ways To Download Torrents Anonymously

# Most Commented Posts

- The Pirate Bay & 1337x Must Be Blocked, Austrian Supreme Court Rules 0
- Assassins Creed Origin DRM Hammers Gamers’ CPUs 0
- Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week on BitTorrent – 10/30/17 0
- Steal This Show S03E10: The Battle Of The Bots 0
- ‘Pirating’ Mainstream Media Outlets Haunted by Photographers in Court 0

## VPN Reviews