WikiLeaks: John Podesta Ordered FBI To Remove "Gross Negligence" From Clinton Exoneration
Author: http://facebook.com/seantut
Description: John Podesta ordered the FBI to remove the term "gross negligence" from the FBI's exoneration statement, according to WikiLeaks.
Date: 2018-01-10T03:44:53+00:00

Headlines

- [ January 10, 2018 ] Tech Guru, Who Helped WikiLeaks Get Clinton Emails, Found Dead News
- [ January 10, 2018 ] Psychiatrist Who Accused Trump Of Instability Is A Fraud With No License To Practice News
- [ January 10, 2018 ] L.A.’s Elite Cannibal Restaurant Boasts Katy Perry, Meryl Streep, Chelsea Clinton As Members Weird
- [ January 10, 2018 ] Teacher Handcuffed & Forcibly Removed From School Meeting For Criticizing Pay Rise News
- [ January 10, 2018 ] Top Girls School Bans Teachers From Calling Pupils ‘Girls’ As It May Offend Trans Students News

Search for:

# WikiLeaks: John Podesta Ordered FBI To Remove “Gross Negligence” From Clinton Exoneration

January 10, 2018 Sean Adl-Tabatabai News, US 1

Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chair John Podesta ordered the FBI to remove the term “gross negligence” from the FBI’s exoneration statement, according to WikiLeaks.

An email from an advisor to Podesta reveals that the Clinton campaign were fully expecting the FBI to use the term “gross negligence” when referring to Hillary’s misuse of a private email server when she was Secretary of State.

Zerohedge.com reports:

In a March 2016 email from former Bill Clinton Chief of Staff Tina Flournoy to Clinton campaign chairman Podesta’s Gmail account, Flournoy included links to two articles concerning the FBI email investigation; one from the Washington Post which minimized Clinton’s actions, and a legal analysis from retired D.C. attorney Paul Mirengoff in which he suggests Clinton was “grossly negligent or worse” and may be in serious hot water. (h/t Mike)

From Mirengoff in Powerline Blog:

First, let’s again examine the statutory language:

“Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document. . .relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer, Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”

The only other question I perceive that stands in the way of Clinton having violated Section 793(f) is whether it was through gross negligence that she permitted the information relating to the national defense to to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to someone who shouldn’t have gotten it.

It was not ordinary negligence that caused Clinton to permit highly sensitive information to be removed from its proper place and onto Clinton’s private email servers. This strikes me as gross negligence at a minimum. Clinton herself had warned others about the prospect of private email accounts being hacked.

Nor was it ordinary negligence to deliver highly sensitive information to someone lacking a security clearance (in this case, an inveterate gossip). Such imprudence, again, seems grossly negligent or worse. -Powerline Blog

While Mirengoff’s assessment was that Hillary Clinton engaged in grossly negligent behavior, Tina Flournoy did not agree – citing the Washington Post article minimizing Clinton’s actions:

“The argument here would be that Clinton engaged in such “gross negligence” by transferring information she knew or should have known was classified from its “proper place” onto her private server, or by sharing it with someone not authorized to receive it. Yet, as the Supreme Court has said, “gross negligence” is a “nebulous” term. Especially in the criminal context, it would seem to require conduct more like throwing classified materials into a Dumpster than putting them on a private server that presumably had security protections.” -Tina Flournoy to John Podesta (WikiLeaks)

Perhaps Podesta decided to run this past Hillary Clinton’s friends at the FBI, as counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok – who headed up the Clinton email investigation – then removed the phrase “gross negligence” from Clinton’s exoneration statement.

To summarize, former Bill Clinton Chief of Staff Tina Flournoy sent John Podesta an email to his Gmail account on March 9, 2016 – with a Washington Post article containing a link to an opinion by a retired D.C. attorney who thinks Clinton committed Gross Negligence. Former FBI Director James Comey’s original draft from May 2, contained the phrase, and at some point over the next eight weeks, Peter Strzok – the man who headed up the investigation, removed it – materially changing the legal significance of Clinton’s actions, effectively “decriminalizing” her behavior when Comey gave his speech on July 5, 2016.

> James Comey gave his speech on July 5th 2016, using the term "EXTREMELY CARELESS"pic.twitter.com/d9ZlsNhdj7

> — Mike (@Fuctupmind) January 7, 2018

One wonders if the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has reviewed this tidbit of information as part of their upcoming report about to be submitted to the Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Congressional investigators – which in all likelihood, assuming their findings are in alignment with recent bombshells, will be the basis for the appointment for a second special counsel and much, much more.

- About
- Latest Posts

Follow me

### Sean Adl-Tabatabai

Editor-in-chief at Your News Wire
Follow me

#### Latest posts by Sean Adl-Tabatabai (see all)

- Millions of Dead And Illegal Voters Discovered In Key Swing State - January 10, 2018
- HIV Positive Teacher Caught Raping, Infecting 42 Young School Kids - January 10, 2018
- Top NYPD Chiefs Fired As Part Of Pedogate Investigation - January 10, 2018

- Duke LaCrosse

  A sadisticpedophile named Skippy orders the FBI around like the little girls they are
  Until a current FBI agent or two takes a stand I consider them all corrupt
  https://truepundit.com/fbi-rocked-second-sexual-assault-la-field-office-two-weeks-alleged-victim-female-doj-lawyer/

Copyright © 2017 The People’s Voice, Inc. All rights reserved | Your News Wire