BREAKING: Trump to remove ‘climate change’ as a national security threat | Watts Up With That?
Description: This is encouraging news: The Trump administration will reverse course from previous Obama administration policy, eliminating climate change from a list of national security threats. The Nat…
Date: 2017-12-15T18:56:12+00:00

Advertisements

# BREAKING: Trump to remove ‘climate change’ as a national security threat

Anthony Watts / 8 hours ago December 15, 2017

This is encouraging news:

The Trump administration will reverse course from previous Obama administration policy, eliminating climate change from a list of national security threats. The National Security Strategy to be released on Monday will emphasize the importance of balancing energy security with economic development and environmental protection, according to a source who has seen the document and shared excerpts of a late draft.

“Climate policies will continue to shape the global energy system,” a draft of the National Security Strategy slated to be released on Monday said. “U.S. leadership is indispensable to countering an anti-growth, energy agenda that is detrimental to U.S. economic and energy security interests. Given future global energy demand, much of the developing world will require fossil fuels, as well as other forms of energy, to power their economies and lift their people out of poverty.”

…

President Obama made climate change, and the burdensome regulations that accompany its focus, a primary focus of his administration, including in his National Security Strategy released in 2015. “[W]e are working toward an ambitious new global climate change agreement to shape standards for prevention, preparedness, and response over the next decade,” that report said.

“In some ways, [climate change] is akin to the problem of terrorism and ISIL,” Obama said at climate talks in Paris in 2015. During a weekly address, Obama said “Today, there is no greater threat to our planet than climate change.”

In September 2016, President Obama released a memorandum requiring federal agencies to consider the effects of climate change in the development of national security-related doctrine, policies, and plans. All of this alarmed critics concerned with more pressing security risks.

Buh-bye!

Read more at The Federalist

Advertisements

### Rate this:

### Share this:

- Google
- Twitter
- Facebook
- Reddit
- LinkedIn
- Tumblr
- Pinterest
- Email

### Like this:

Like Loading...

### Related posts

### Trump to sign “energy independence” executive order today, killing Obama climate regs

### President Obama Demands Intelligence Agencies Draft Plans to Combat Climate Change

### Trump’s Reported Decision to Withdraw from Paris Agreement Right Choice for America and the World

## 73 thoughts on “BREAKING: Trump to remove ‘climate change’ as a national security threat”

1. Finally, sanity prevails. This announcement is more than welcome.

   Reply

2. So much for all the extra busy work for the Federal bureaucracy!

   Reply

3. Still eating that elephant!

   Reply

4. Good news.

   Reply

5. have any of you wondered want line of business some of these retired military officers get into? a few years ago I noticed that lots of gov’t money can be handed out to the companies these guys work for. most of the services would be in the nature of moving “aid” to areas through out the world which “may” be affected by some/any/kind-a-sort-a man made world event.

   Reply

6. The climate change vampire just took a stake to the heart. Three cheers!

   Reply

   - But like a zombie.. it may come back out of the grave.

     Reply

     - All government offices** have had filing cabinets, and now digital files, where bad ideas go to wait.

       **Climate research center data files seem to be an exception.

     - Zombies… don’t they eat human brains? Is that a potential explanation for some of the consensorati publications?

   - Alternatively, Climate Change is like a Christmas pantomime and the evil witch has just appeared again on stage, cue ritual response from the audience.

     Reply

     - Oh no it isn’t !!!

   - No, fight and reverse the EPA endangerment finding.
     That would drive the stake. Without reversal, it is too easy for a future president to so and revive the whole beast.

     This is what Sessions at Justice should be working on.

     Reply

     - Sanity and humanity!

     - Agree.

   - This announcement buys us 3-7 yrs to put a stake through it. Until we reduce the power and corruption of the federal beasts, CAGW authoritarianism is an election away…

     Reply

7. So when are they going to “offer” Gavin Schmidt early retirement?

   Reply

8. It was always delusional to believe climate change would have any effect on national security. Hitler/atilla the hun, william the conquer, Mao, pol pot, ida amin, punic wars, the crusades –
   all caused by climate change?

   Reply

   - Hmmm.
     Why were Attila the Hun and Winnie the Pooh related?

     Same middle name.

     Auto
     Enjoy – or Sorry, of course.

     Reply

9. Well done President Trump. His pragmatic Scottish blood prevails.

   Like everything else, US national security was hijacked by the green movement. Perhaps now the US armed forces and associated organisations can get back to doing what they should be doing, protecting the US from military threats like NK.

   Reply

   - Projections of the timing of CAGW are far beyond military (or economic) planning horizons. Spending scarce resources on far-out “projections” is insanity. [I like far-out.]

     Reply

10. if that’s all trump ever does, it’s enough to canonize him.
    don’t expect he’ll receive any nobel peace prize.
    and so many parisites will have to sate their voracious appetites on each other.
    please note THERE WAS NO FREAKIN DEBATING.
    he just said no, hell no, nope and NO. period.

    Reply

11. The spin-off might be that other countries might say, well, erm, wot’s the threat to us!? Sea level rise? Wot are the facts!? Is it getting hotter- where is my padded jacket ? Even the British CCC can one hope?

    Reply

    - Pray that sea levels continue to rise.

      If you don’t know why I say that, SkS is the site for you.

      Reply

    - CdL
      One can hope about Britain.
      I cross my fingers, too – and have little faith in the present population of professional political prostitutes – is that correct?; possibly previously-enjoyed pretenders?

      Auto

      Reply

      - Auto, perhaps this speech by Oliver Cromwell is in tune should be repeated in parliament today?

        Speech
        It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonored by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.
        Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter’d your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?
        Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil’d this sacred place, and turn’d the Lord’s temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress’d, are yourselves gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors.
        In the name of God, go!
        Oliver Cromwell – April 20, 1653

        Paul Watkinson.

      - Too bad he couldn’t drain the swamp.

        Give President Trump some time; he has made a start.

12. Now fire all the senior officers who supported such nonsense.

    Reply

13. This is so very wrongheaded. You see, just the other day there was a cloud, now I don’t know whether it was a cumulus or a cirrus cloud, but there was a cloud outside with a suicide vest strapped on and attempting to blow up the municipal building. Think of that. And those clouds are all around us. Dark, dark, dark sinister clouds. Gosh, people are right about what an idiot Trump is not to recognize this threat the way Obama did.

    Reply

    - believe that was really your evil sister :>)

      Reply

14. Immediately fire all political appointees not appointed by President Trump.

    Immediately transfer all Senior Executive Service people to positions where they can do no harm to President Trump. HR seems like the current dumping ground for Deep State operatives caught attempting to torpedo President Trump.

    Reply

15. Merry Xmas!!!

    Reply

    - Yes, David; that is quite the Christmas present President Trump gave rational people!

      Reply

16. Good deal, way to go Mr. Trump! 👍🏻

    Reply

17. “Climate policies will continue to shape the global energy system…”
    Daphuk does that even mean? There’s a “global energy system”? Is there a “global economics system” and a “global education system” as well? How about a “global food system”? “Climate policies” eh? Whatever those are, under Trump, they no longer apply, unless Drill Baby Drill qualifies.

    Reply

18. I am beginning to love this president. Now if he would tweet something about it so that the press will stampede after this story like cats to a laser pointer.

    Reply

    - Winning, winning, winning… It’s all he ever does. I’m getting sick of the Left’s complaints!

      Reply

19. I understand that the French have decided to finance the scam now.

    Reply

    - Hope they bring their accordions to the fight since their rifles have not seemed to do them much good since they helped us with our revolutionary war.

      Reply

      - For sale:
        Vintage French world war rifle. Perfect condition. Never fired, dropped twice.

      - You might want to look up Verdun.

    - Simon, buying climate scientists (the irony burns) is cheap. It is the massive costs associated with fundamentally altering our society, economy and energy systems that hurt.

      Is there anyone on this Thread that believes those costs are justified by the IPCC climate models? Those models are the basis of all the ensuing clisci speculation nonsense.

      Reply

20. The Great National Delusion is still being indoctrinated throughout the school system and widely disseminated by all forms of media.

    Reply

21. I can only hope that the Australian Government follows suit.

    This was reported in Oz 4 days ago:

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/defence/defence-warns-of-climate-change-peril-for-food-energy-and-peace/news-story/3fbb9f63d18db48446a348a16c3b6429

    Apparently the Australian Defence Dept is not afraid of the effects of natural climate change, only man-made climate change.

    Reply

    - Canadian Medical Association (CMA), 2010

      CMA Policy Document, 5 pages

      Includes: “Climate change”

      And:

      ‘Climate Change and Human Health’

      Note : References, include IPCC
      http://www.cma.ca/Assets/assets-library/document/en/advocacy/PD10-07-e.pdf

      And:

      CMA, 2016

      Re: Promotion of “climate change”

      60 page Document includes photos of “climate disasters”

      http://www.cma.ca/Assets/assets-library/document/en/about-us/cg2016/consequences-of-climate-change-en.pdf

      Reply

      - Correction:
        http://www.cma.ca/Assets/assets-library/document/en/about-us/gc2016/consequences-of-climate-change-en.pdf

22. Great move by the Trump Adinistration. This Obama mandate was unbelievably stupid!

    Reply

23. Winning bigly!

    w.

    Reply

24. There was also this image from 2015

    Reply

    - BTW, there is research showing that linking human conflicts to climate change is unsupported by facts on the ground. Social grievances and failed governments are far more predictive of security breakdowns.

      https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2017/07/14/updated-climates-dont-start-wars-people-do/

      Reply

25. balancing energy security…….winning

    Reply

26. “National Security Threat”.
    Don’t those involve people?
    The closest “Climate Change” could have come to being a “National Security” threat would be the-yet-to-show-up “Climate Refuges”.
    Obama’s response?
    Don’t enforce the illegal immigration laws and weaken the ones in place.

    Reply

27. “U.S. leadership is indispensable to countering an anti-growth, energy agenda that is detrimental to U.S. economic and energy security interests. Given future global energy demand, much of the developing world will require fossil fuels, as well as other forms of energy, to power their economies and lift their people out of poverty.”

    It would be so, so easy for people who want to live without fossil fuels, and the thousands of products derived from them, to just go live in places that don’t have these things. Just think: no em waves, organic food which is expensive and scarce, very few plastics or fibers for clothes, and no steel and cement. I would applaud the honesty of the purists who moved to underdeveloped nations to get away from the cultures that use applied science.

    In fact, it should tell us something that they never do immigrate to the poor podunk countries that they claim are so healthy and idyllic for humans to live in. And whatsmore, if you press them enough about why they don’t personally give up modern technologies, they say, “It doesn’t make any difference unless every one does it.” So the rank and file anti-energy environmentalists takes no action, cannot support himself or any one else with his theories, does not leave the country, and merely complains and regulates any one else using the applied sciences in every day life.

    Reply

    - “Socialism is for the people…not the socialist.” Andrew Wilkow, S/XM 125 Patriot.

      From my point of view. The socialist are the elites that dictate what the people are to do, not themselves. This is seen in every country that has socialist as a ruling party. The socialist can “live like kings” as the people live in poverty “as serfs” and the classes should never mingle.

      Many of the environmentalists see themselves as superior to the masses and have the same complex as given above. “Do as I say, not as I do.” We see many like Al Gore types making giant “carbon footprints” even when they use the power saving and renewable energy and want you and I to live without what they have.

      The only real “Environmentalists” are those that live short lives out in nature like animals, without clothes and cannot eat anything from nature that would disturb it.

      Trump is doing his best to MAGA. He just did a photo-op that showed the results of 22 – 1 for every regulation made he has removed 22 in his 326 days in office. He only campaigned on a 2 for 1. If Congress got behind President Trump this would be even better if they actually made the tax cuts and cut more funding from the laviathon government we have. If Democrats had really belived in “equality” they would accept a Flat Tax or Consumption Tax. This Graduated Tax System is purely Socialism in action by taking more from the successful and distribution to those less successful, while not taking any from the least successful and giving them refunds more that they contributed. [End rant]

      National Security has nothing to do with Climate Change. Preparation for weather events in the areas they are sent is just good policy. It was Obama’s policies that had our military strangled by watching every drop of fuel as an economic factor in what he sent them to do. Mostly it is why the fight against ISIS/ISIL was ineffective. He (Obama) wanted the military to go “Green Energy” on renewable energy sources. That greatly hindered their movements and preparedness.

      Thank you President Trump.

      Reply

      - Leading from behind means your military sits back, watches and lets it’s readiness degrade.

28. Everyone complains about the weather but no one actually does anything about it. Man has been unable to change one weather event let alone change climate. The climate has been changing for eons and will continue to change whether mankind is here or not. The climate change we are experiencing today is caused by the sun and the oceans over which mankind has no control There is no real evidence that CO2 has any effect on climate and plenty of scientific rational to support the idea that the climate sensivity of CO2 is zero. Even if we could stop the climate from changeing, extreme weather events and sea level rise are all part of the curent climate and would continue to take place. There is no optimum climate for everyone. During the Obama Administration, how effective was the military in compating climate change? We tax payers want to know what we got for our investment in our military in terms of controling climate change. As far as I can tell, our military was unable to stop any extreme weather events during the Obama Administration.

    Reply

    - If only Obama would have waited till high tide to have the military bomb the waves!
      “He” might have won a third term!
      (Which might have been terminal for The Constitution and The Bill of Rights.)

      Reply

    - But our military was able to hold off land-falling hurricanes throughout the Obama Administration. Job well done, climate warriors. I’m sure they will all get the coveted “Kicked Weather In The Ass” medal.

      President Trump takes over and we get a couple of hurricanes right off the bat. The U.S. military is falling apart without having the mission to fight the climate. Our military needs a new mission immediately!

      I suggest we attack France. It will be an easier foe to defeat.

      Reply

29. Still not sick of winning…

    Reply

30. But what is the military going to do with all that bio fuel for aircraft and ships?
    Do you think DJT can sell it to France?

    Reply

    - Sell it to Governor Moonbeam.

      Reply

      - No don’t! He’ll try to put-out the fire with that stuff!

31. Todos tienen algo de razón, unos mas otros menos pero todos tienen algo de razón y esta poca o mucha razón esta en relación directa con el poco o mucho conocimiento que tienen del Calentamiento Global. El Presidente Trump y sus asesores también tienen un “poquito”de razón porque desconocen la verdadera causa del Calentamiento Global.Lo mejor,lo mas acertado,lo mas inteligente,lo mas interesante es cuando Trump dice “La Estrategia de Seguridad Nacional enfatizara la importancia de equilibrar la Seguridad Energética con el Desarrollo Económico y la Protección Ambiental”.
    Pero, se equivoca cuando dice que “Dado el futuro de la demanda mundial de ENERGÍA, gran parte del mundo en desarrollo requerirá COMBUSTIBLES FÓSILES”. Y esto lo dice porque “lo único que tenemos para reemplazar a los COMBUSTIBLES FÓSILES que generan ELECTRICIDAD son la Energía Solar y la Eólica y Trump “sabe” que con la ENERGÍA SOLAR Y EÓLICA NO SE LLEGA A NINGUNA PARTE y por eso “defiende”el uso de combustibles fósiles.
    El Presidente no sabe que el próximo año sera el “lanzamiento” a nivel mundial de un novedoso SISTEMA pera generar ELECTRICIDAD abundante y barata,no contamina,no produce gases de efecto invernadero,no le afecta la sequía,no le afecta las inundaciones,los huracanes,los terremotos.
    Este NOVEDOSO SISTEMA para generar ENERGÍA LIMPIA no afecta el bienestar de las personas.
    En el espacio que ocupa un estadio de fútbol se puede generar 5 GW de ELECTRICIDAD, instalar toda la estructura se demora máximo 2 años.
    Este novedoso sistema para generar electricidad es EXTRAORDINARIO, por eso decimos que el Presidente se equivoca porque considera que los COMBUSTIBLES FÓSILES seguirán “reinando”.
    Obama dijo “Hoy, no hay mayor amenaza para nuestro planeta que el Cambio Climático”.
    Y tenia razón, todo lo que le esta pasando al planeta es por el CALENTAMIENTO GLOBAL;pero todo en la naturaleza es CÍCLICO,esto ha pasado siempre,el CALENTAMIENTO GLOBAL se produce cada 100 años.Se INICIA siempre 15 a 20 años antes de fin de siglo y TERMINA en los primeros 15 a 20 años del nuevo siglo y lo CAUSA el asenso del magma en las ERUPCIONES VOLCÁNICAS TERRESTRES Y MARINAS que CALIENTA la corteza terrestre y se produce el deshielo de los glaciares y elevan la TEMPERATURA DEL MAR.
    Las GRANDES ERUPCIONES VOLCÁNICAS siempre se dan a fin de siglo y son la CAUSA principal del CALENTAMIENTO GLOBAL
    Erupciones volcánicas…………..60%
    Sol………………………………………30%
    Hombre……………………………….10%
    Se TERMINA el CALENTAMIENTO GLOBAL
    Sol………………………………………60%
    Erupciones volcánicas……………20%
    Hombre………………………………..20%
    Obama tenia razón de preocuparse porque el CALENTAMIENTO GLOBAL del 2000 fue un poco mas fuerte del CALENTAMIENTO GLOBAL de 1900, pero MENOS CALIENTE que el del 2100 y el CALENTAMIENTO GLOBAL del 220 sera mas fuerte que el del 2100 y así,sucesivamente.Que lo que paso en este CALENTAMIENTO GLOBAL sirva para prepararnos para el próximo a finales del siglo xxl para que no nos afecte mucho.
    Nadie es dueño de la “verdad absoluta”, TODOS hemos tenido aciertos y equivocaciones.
    NO HACER NADA HUBIESE SIDO MAS CRITICABLE

    .

    Reply

    - Gesundheit!

      Reply

    - Gracias, mi amigo Milton.

      Reply

    - En Ingles, por favor.

      Reply

    - It is nice to know that crackpots can write Spanish.

      Reply

32. Hmm. The trouble is climate change could well be a security issue. Global cooling is very likely to result in failed crops and famine in various parts of the world, that will decrease stability and create many regional threats.

    Reply

33. Eliminating the Obama Vietcong from schools, Colleges and Universities will take time but the process has begun at the Federal and State government levels.

    Reply

34. Sanity and humanity!

    Reply

35. About time!

    Reply

36. What has been happening is that federal agencies, at all levels, have had to waste countless hours producing climate change planning documents. That is to say, not only planning for what the agency is supposed to be doing, but also planning for the 1) additional GHG emissions that might result from the action and 2) the effects of climate change on the action.

    For example, say I am in the dept. of transportation, and the government wishes to build a road. I have to plan – how much is the road going to increase the release of GHGs? There are the GHGs emitted from the machinery used to build it. The GHGs from the concrete, and from the factory, and from the trucks that hauled it to the sight. The road may cause people to drive more, increasing GHG emissions. Or it might shorten the commute time for the drivers, meaning they emit less. The road might cross a wetlands, but with climate change, might those wetlands have disappeared anyway? or perhaps expanded? What about the carbon absorption capacity of the prairie grass being covered? Perhaps the road will increase economic activity in some way, resulting in more GHGs?

    A big fat report filled with arm waving is produced, and we all get to take turns imagining new and ever more fantastic climate repercussions of our decision to build a road. then argue over who’s fantasy is most likely, and which arm waving estimate to use.

    And, at the end of the day, absolutely nothing ever changes, because, heck, we need a bloody road. So we toss the report in a bin and proceed.

    Think I’m joking?

    For climate change true believers, this is an absolute farce. It accomplishes nothing. It wastes money. I’ve often thought just get rid of this silly goat rope, and vow to spend $5 billion on solar panels, donated to charities, and we would be still several billion $ ahead of the game.

    Reply

37. Great news, thanks!

    Reply

### Leave a Reply - if your comment doesn't appear right away, it may have been intercepted by the SPAM filter. Please have patience while our moderation team examines it. Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)
Name (required)
Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

Advertisements

# Search WUWT:

Search

# The Maxim of our resolve

“Walk toward the fire. Don’t worry about what they call you.” – Andrew Breitbart | read more

# Site stats

- 336,474,913 views

# Weather Picture of the Day

Click for the image

# Awarded TOP 100 Status

"...the world's most viewed climate website"
- Fred Pearce The Climate Files:
The Battle for the Truth about Global Warming

"...invaluable" - Steven F. Hayward, The Weekly Standard

"...changed the world and is one of the most influential resources on global warming. - Jonathon Moseley, American Thinker

"...flashy (apparently widely distributed)"- Michael E. Mann

# Now on DVD:

# The QLav®

# NEW RELEASE! BUY THIS BOOK…

# Shameless Plug

Donations accepted: fling funds to help keep the www.surfacestations.org project going.

# Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

# Follow WUWT via Email

Enter your email address to follow WUWT and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 46,622 other followers

# Recent Posts

- The sun is blank, NASA data shows it to be dimming
- Brown and Caldeira: A closer look shows global warming will not be greater than we thought
- BREAKING: Trump to remove ‘climate change’ as a national security threat
- Quote of the week: The clouds, the 1%, and the ‘holy grail’ of climate science
- France24: US Climate Scientists Emigrating to France
- Where The Temperature Rules The Sun
- Robusting the chances of a megadrought in the U.S.
- Clean Energy Researchers Recommend More Research Money
- More entries for ‘worse than we thought week’: climate change could accelerate by mid-century
- Is climate change REALLY the culprit causing California’s wildfires?
- Claim: Climate change made Harvey rainfall 15 percent more intense
- Calculating the Cost of Global Warming
- Laser-boron fusion now ‘leading contender’ for energy
- New study puts the 1.5°C and 2.0°C temperature limits of the Paris Agreement into a historical climate context
- Weubbles Gone Wild: presenting alarming new projections for US temperature

# Top Posts & Pages

- BREAKING: Trump to remove 'climate change' as a national security threat
- Laser-boron fusion now 'leading contender' for energy
- The sun is blank, NASA data shows it to be dimming
- Where The Temperature Rules The Sun
- Is climate change REALLY the culprit causing California's wildfires?
- Calculating the Cost of Global Warming
- France24: US Climate Scientists Emigrating to France
- Quote of the week: The clouds, the 1%, and the 'holy grail' of climate science
- New study puts the 1.5°C and 2.0°C temperature limits of the Paris Agreement into a historical climate context
- More entries for 'worse than we thought week': climate change could accelerate by mid-century

December 2017
M | T | W | T | F | S | S
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
« Nov |  |
| 1 | 2 | 3
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31

# Archives

Archives

# Categories

Categories

# Recent Comments

| Javier on The sun is blank, NASA data sh…
| Pamela Gray on The sun is blank, NASA data sh…
| John F. Hultquist on The sun is blank, NASA data sh…
| Pop Piasa on The sun is blank, NASA data sh…
| Javier on The sun is blank, NASA data sh…
| Sparks on The sun is blank, NASA data sh…
| John M on BREAKING: Trump to remove…
| Barbara on BREAKING: Trump to remove…
| Curious George on BREAKING: Trump to remove…
| Pop Piasa on The sun is blank, NASA data sh…

# Humor/Satire

- Cartoons By Josh
- The Daily Bayonet

# Lukewarmers

- Climate Abyss – John Nielsen-Gammon
- Climate Debate Daily
- Climate Science – Pielke Sr.
- Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.
- Dr. Roy Spencer
- Judith Curry
- Lucia's The Blackboard
- Moshtemp – Steve Mosher
- The Lukewarmer's Way – Tom Fuller
- Thomas Fuller – 3000quads

# Political Climate

- American Elephants
- Andrew Bolt
- Autonomous Mind
- Christopher Booker
- Climate Depot
- EU Referendum – Richard North
- Green Hell Blog
- James Delingpole @ Breitbart
- NYT Dot Earth – Revkin
- Planet Gore

# Pro AGW Views

- AccuWeather GW Blog
- Collide-a-scape – Keith Kloor
- Real Climate
- scienceofdoom
- Stoat – Connolley
- Tamino's Open Mind

# Skeptical Views

- 1000+ skeptical papers
- A Walk On The Natural Side – Jim Steele
- Appinsys
- Australian Climate Madness
- Bishop Hill
- Bob Carter
- C3 Headlines
- Carlin Economics
- Climate Audit
- Climate Change 101
- Climate Change Dispatch
- Climate Conversation – NZ
- Climate Realists of Norway
- Climate Resistance
- Climate Sanity
- Climate Skeptic
- Climate Views
- CO2 Science
- Die Kalte Sonne
- Digging in the Clay
- Dr. Norman Page
- Dr. Tim Ball
- Ecotretas
- Friends of Science
- Haunting the library
- ICECAP
- International Climate Science Coalition
- Jennifer Marohasy
- Jo Nova
- Marcel Crok – De staat van het klimaat
- Master Resource
- Niche Modeling – David Stockwell
- No Frakking Consensus
- No Tricks Zone
- Small Dead Animals
- Solar Cycle 24 Board
- Surfacestations Gallery
- Surfacestations Main
- Susan Crockford – polarbearscience
- Tallbloke’s Talkshop
- The Air Vent
- The Chiefio – E.M. Smith
- The Cosmic Tusk
- The GWPF
- The Hockey Schtick
- The Next Grand Minimum
- The Reference Frame
- Tom Nelson
- Trust Yet Verify
- Warren Meyer
- Warwick Hughes
- William Briggs
- World Climate Report

# Tools

- NCDC Hi/Lo Records lookup
- Our World in Data
- SOHO solar images
- UAH AMSU Daily Temps
- Weather Picture of the Day
- WFT – Interactive Climate Graph Engine

# Transcendent Rant and way out there theory

- Climate Progress
- Climate Realists

# Unreliable*

- Skeptical Science – John Cook

* Due to (1) deletion, extension and amending of user comments, and (2) undated post-publication revisions of article contents after significant user commenting.

# Click for the:

# Sea Ice Page

# Solar Images & Data Page

# Atmospheric Maps Page

# ENSO/SST Page

# ENSO Meter

# WUWT Tag Cloud

Al Gore American Geophysical Union Antarctic antarctica Arctic Atlantic Ocean Australia Barack Obama BBC Bill McKibben california Carbon dioxide China climate climate change Climate model Climate sensitivity Climatic Research Unit Climatic Research Unit email controversy Climatology Current sea level rise Earth El Niño-Southern Oscillation Energy environment EPA Extreme weather Freedom of Information Act Geophysical Research Letters Global warming Global Warming Policy Foundation Goddard Institute for Space Studies greenhouse gas greenland Heartland Institute Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC IPCC Fourth Assessment Report James Hansen Josh Judith Curry La Nina Little Ice Age Medieval Warm Period Met Office Michael Mann NASA National Center for Atmospheric Research National Climatic Data Center National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Science Foundation National Weather Service New York Times NOAA Northern Hemisphere Pacific Ocean Peter Gleick Polar ice packs Roy Spencer Science & Environmental Policy Project Sea ice Sea level Sea Surface Temperature Skeptical Science Snow Solar variation Steve McIntyre sun temperature Temperature record Tropical cyclone United States United States Environmental Protection Agency University of East Anglia Watts Up With That?

# Feed Me

RSS - Posts

RSS - Comments

# Sponsored links

IT Certifications:

Braindumps
Pass4sure CISSP
CCNA Certification
CCDA Pass4sure
CCIE Pass4sure

# Meta

- Register
- Log in
- Entries RSS
- Comments RSS
- WordPress.com

# Copyright Notice

Material on this website is copyright © 2006-2017, by Anthony Watts, and may not be stored or archived separately, rebroadcast, or republished without written permission. (Miriam O'Brien aka slandering "Sou" from Hotwhopper, that means you.)

For permission, contact us. See the About>Contact menu under the header.

All rights reserved worldwide.

Some material from contributors may contain additional copyrights of their respective company or organization.

Post to
Cancel
Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address
Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: