# Posts

Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  wtf is with this wall of text ( aka nothing of substance) Can someone translate this into niggerspeak?


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post6916'>&gt;&gt;6916</a><br />The &quot;talk to sakamoto&quot; suggestion should work fine for every person posting on nano, except the boogeyman himself.<br />


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: 980da8ce515434622d22856dd1c429b9b26c3bf0708ee679da42668206671b78.jpg
Comment:
  Who the fuck even visits The Stormer from [not_tor]?<br /><br />I wouldn&#39;t touch The Stormer&#39;s clearweb domain with a 2 ft long baddragon.


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post6918'>&gt;&gt;6918</a><br />Actually, the first paragraph of my reply is basically my genuine response to such a reauest if you take out the asukafags. Honestly I&#39;m not even a 100% sure endofunctor&#39;s not asukafag in the first place. I guess we&#39;ll see


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10310'>&gt;&gt;10310</a><br />Yes. Notice how all the &#39;old&#39; holidays we celebrate are suspiciously centered around the relative movement of the earth and sun. Its just pagan shit rebranded by christcucks. <br />Christmas is very close to the darkest, longest night of the year, also notice the theme of warmth and generosity. Shame it got completely destroyed by companies using it as an excuse to push materialism on us.<br />Easter is about the start of the spring and fertility - thats where the rabbits and eggs come in. This is even more noticeable in the way countries with actual histories celebrate it.<br />All of that is pretty damn ironic considering that Jesus worship is just worship of the sun. It came full circle didnt it.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: 01369311f31a49da560b15fd1e4e6eea2e60b8fdeea440fee3d937862d0a0d4e.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7977'>&gt;&gt;7977</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;muh stocks</span>


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: 1b7c9d1753f9f8ee07f4fed4bc38513ce54504c60e25f9a9dc701fc849199963.jpg
Comment:
  So the Jews are going after their own puppet. What for? I don&#39;t get what game they&#39;re playing this time over.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10298'>&gt;&gt;10298</a><br />The way he says he&#39;s not a Jew is only something Jews do tbh.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17717'>&gt;&gt;17717</a> <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;there&#39;s a grain of what could be called truth in everything</span><br />Fuck off normalfag.<br /><a class='reference' href='#post18106'>&gt;&gt;18106</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I live just down the road if you want to come over</span><br />POLIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICE, HE&#39;S A RAPIST, I AM BEING PREDATED, RAPE RAPE RAPE RAAAAAPE RAAAAPE!!!!!!!


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18104'>&gt;&gt;18104</a><br />My boomer dad didn&#39;t agree with the butcher when the butcher told him you can get 2 sirloins out of a single cow. That doesn&#39;t change the fact that he&#39;s a fucking retard and there are 2 sirloins on a cow.<br />When it comes to truth, whether people disagree on anything is irrelevant. Truth isn&#39;t what the majority agrees with you normalfaggot.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18095'>&gt;&gt;18095</a><br />If the pictures you have been posting are from anime you watch then certainly you have watched a lot of absolute trash.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Flashback
File: eeb6091ccde0e23ee13086f9de5d42b01933b80aa5b71c1d23373e85c935f4c2.jpg
Comment:
  Do you ever run into your <i>old self</i> when searching or browsing around the Internet? This could be old memes that get re-posted, old text posts, old files that you forgot about.<br /><br />It would be interesting, without giving specific details, to hear if anyone else has had this happen. I personally, don&#39;t think I&#39;ve ever been high-profile enough to have it happen to me.<br /><br />Do you think this is unlikely to happen at all due to the destruction of old focal points like geocities, forums, etc.?


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a rel='noreferrer' href='https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/meta/8.html#post6923'>https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/meta/8.html#post6923</a><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/meta/8.html#post6924'>https://nanochanqwrwtmamtnhkfwbbcducc4i62ciss4byo6f3an5qdkhjngid.onion/meta/8.html#post6924</a><br />Some people are posting random jumbles of letters and numbers. Maybe it&#39;s secret CP trading or some shit, better get that looked at.


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post6912'>&gt;&gt;6912</a><br />Asukafag, you do not have any rights on nanochan.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7985'>&gt;&gt;7985</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;da joos</span>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: VPS
File: cee0052f63b843e98d3e820b0aec5dace8ca751df159a5e1747f0115006d50e1.jpg
Comment:
  What does /g/ think of VPS&#39;s i usually don&#39;t trust them enough to host my content, so i self host most of the time.<br />But a couple of days ago i discovered a service called SporeStack, which is a VPS which supports Tor only nodes, and iirc only supports payment in crypto.<br /><br />You don&#39;t need an account to get a VPS there, you just pay and upload your ssh key, and you can even pay from the terminal.<br /><br />I don&#39;t know is it any good? Do you know of any better VPS?<br /><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='http://spore64i5sofqlfz5gq2ju4msgzojjwifls7rok2cti624zyq3fcelad.onion/'>http://spore64i5sofqlfz5gq2ju4msgzojjwifls7rok2cti624zyq3fcelad.onion/</a>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  I checked their website but I couldn&#39;t easily find what virtualization software they are using. Before trusting them with anything check if they run a version of Linux full of vulnerabilities so they can share resources between virtual servers. For example, if they run OpenVZ -&gt; kernel version 2.6.32, you better run.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <i>need to enable JavaScript</i>  hmmmmm<br /><i>upload ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub</i> Hope you don&#39;t use that default key for anything else.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Why do people waste their time on reinventing imageboard engines, when they could invest it into developing a decentralised imageboard?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10329'>&gt;&gt;10329</a><br />You only need Javashit if you pay through the browser, you can pay over your command line (Assuming you run a decent shell).


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10329'>&gt;&gt;10329</a><br />Can&#39;t you just make more SSH keys?<br /><br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10333'>&gt;&gt;10333</a><br />Indeed, however the specific one used in the example is the default name for when you generate one. It should tell you to make a unique one specifically only for use with the service. Public ssh keys can be used to track users, if used on public websites like github.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10334'>&gt;&gt;10334</a><br />I agree they probably should write something like you just wrote, but if you aren&#39;t a complete brainlet you would know anyway, and if you were a reddit tier idiot you wouldn&#39;t care.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18112'>&gt;&gt;18112</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;rape accusation </span><br />I have two things to say to you.<br />1) Stop talking to feminists<br />2) Stop being fat


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10334'>&gt;&gt;10334</a><br />You actually have to be even more careful. You must use the -i option or IdentityFile configuration. If you don&#39;t the ssh server can test to see if you have the private key to the public key they suggest.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7970'>&gt;&gt;7970</a><br />It doesn&#39;t matter. All jews will still be killed, as they must.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7939'>&gt;&gt;7939</a><br />If you seriously believe that there is a possible future in which each and every one of them HASN&#39;T a bullet in their head then you are seriously naive.<br />The genocide of niggers and jews will come soon. One leads to another.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;and nobody had to fucking die.</span><br />Jew exposed. There is no future for your or your leftist pets. We will kill you all, and there iis nothing that you can do about it.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: 293262a2f93f06efdbfd74ff78d6ac83cfdeabb5e3a25583e9765520848dbbc7.jpg
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;Drumpf just got impeached.</span><br />Factually incorrect.<br />There was a vote to proceed with impeachment that passed in Congress due to partisan bias.<br />


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: 22812e4052b14f5331d6156c6d54b4a6786e15e9cada52ba09050b106b581012.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7982'>&gt;&gt;7982</a><br />Fuck, the whole thread is already in niggerspeak.<br />The lolbert started saying that nobody has any rights over anybody else, everyone else said that the general public is retarded and needs to be governed.<br />Then it became a heap of &quot;everybody should be free&quot; vs &quot;we can&#39;t when there&#39;s niggers&quot;, then &quot;power corrupts&quot; vs &quot;not necessarily&quot;. Basically everybody here is uneducated. Those shilling for NatSoc don&#39;t do it very well and should read Mein Kampf. Those shilling for lefty shit have derailed the topic and started arguing about the definition of &quot;nation&quot;.<br />Everybody seems to forget that it&#39;s usually education that fixes these issues rather than regulation, ie. when you teach people the dangers of drugs <u>properly</u> they&#39;re more likely to not do drugs than if you just banned drugs. Half-way somebody was arguing about propaganda, but pretty much everything you teach to a kid is indoctrination, so you should at least indoctrinate things that are good for the society. Propaganda isn&#39;t good or bad, it&#39;s just a means to an end.<br />Lastly, the lolbert was arguing in favour of individuality, as in &quot;I do what I want rather than what&#39;s best for everybody else&quot;, and &quot;whatever I do to myself has no effect on you&quot;. Take it how you will.<br /><br />(As if anybody is here to read this) I will explain, in terms of freedom, what Hitler&#39;s National Socialism was about:<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Freedom and independence of your people</span><br />This is the &quot;National&quot; part of National Socialism, and the meaning stems from the 1910s German use of the word, meaning &quot;the interests of the folk&quot;, &#39;folk&#39; here meaning your group sharing common ancestry, language, culture and traditions. For instance, while there is a continental &quot;European race&quot;, which has 3 sub-races (nordic, alpine and mediterranean), there are multiple folks within that race, for instance Brits, Scots, Germans, Nords and Frenchmen, that don&#39;t necessarily coincide with current borders (Germany being the biggest example, as Germany and Austria are both countries of the same German folk but with different governments). In Hitler&#39;s case, the German elements of Austria and Poland were being oppressed by the Slavs (Czechs and Poles respectively), so National Socialism was a way to bring those people back into one Reich to stand as one, free of outside influence.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Freedom from international finance</span><br />International Finance is the biggest enemy of National Socialism as its interests do not coincide with the folk&#39;s interests: the interests of International Finance (which mostly consists of Hebrews) are to make as much money as possible from everybody else, whereas the interests of National Socialism are to safeguard the wellbeing of the folk (this is where the &quot;Socialism&quot; comes in, &quot;Socialism&quot; here just means &quot;making life better&quot; rather than whatever meaning Marxism has given it).<br />By not relying on international finance, the economy can just go back to serving the people rather than the other way around; it can just be a way to facilitate the circulation of goods and services. Interest can be completely removed, which means that taxes which were paying for interest can be abolished and all government income can be raised from national businesses like railroads and telecommunications. There should be no private financial interests in public infrastructure, as that means that private interests can control them to the detriment of the public.<br />(If you want to know more about the economic aspects of the Third Reich, read Gottfried Feder&#39;s &quot;Manifesto for the abolition of Interest-Slavery&quot; and &quot;The Programme of the NSDAP and its General Conceptions&quot;)<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Freedom to own property</span><br />We&#39;re not commies<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The press is free to speak, but not free to lie</span><br />If the press is working to the detriment of the people, it will be DISCONTINUED.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Relative freedom of action and idea</span><br />While it may seem paradoxical (if you follow the mainstream narrative) that a fascist state lets you think and act freely, those in the Third Reich actually had more freedom than we do today. Because the Third Reich was such a cohesive and high-trust society, there was a much smaller need for laws outlawing things like guns, as gun violence is a LOT lower in a high-trust society with a very low amount of seedy outsiders. Have you ever felt annoyed because somebody has done something retarded and &quot;ruined it for the rest of us&quot;? This is seeking to prevent that on a national scale.<br />It all sums up to this:<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You are free to do anything that isn&#39;t detrimental to the people</span>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4669'>&gt;&gt;4669</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;expecting quality on /b/</span>


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: aa6ee2a41f6ff3674774781cddd2de387fbf9f9b2c541c500f94eb5efa89bcb6.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7861'>&gt;&gt;7861</a><br />Stop being such a strawmanning adhom-poster.<br />NATIONAL SOCIALISTS couldn&#39;t care less about some country in the Levant, they mainly want to <u>ERASE</u> the Hebrews running the Press, entertainment, drug trade (trade of non-beneficial addictive substances such as sugar, alcohol and tobacco; in other words, profiting at the expense of the health of the people), media and top-level banks like the Federal Reserve and the other Rothschild banks. The country called Israel is full of kikes but the ones doing the most damage are the ones hidden in our societies.<br /><br />Before the kikes were given a piece of the Levant, Israel meant the world Jewish community and &quot;Zionism&quot; meant &quot;work in the interest of the Jewish community&quot;. These days anti-zionism means &#39;the opposition of Jewish influence in our societies&#39;.<br /><br />Also, we have no delusions that Muslims will become peaceful if we help them destroy Israel.<br />It&#39;s more like we think that there&#39;s a high chance that we can coincide with the Arabs and Turks as long as the Zion Owned Governments stop fighting proxy wars by funding terrorist organizations and inciting insurrections in their countries.<br />If the forces of Islam really decide to fight us, then we will take them on, but for now it seems like they just really don&#39;t like CIA intervention in civil wars and the US Government funding of terrorist groups. If you look at Iran and Syria, you&#39;ll see a reasonable government of people who just have a different religion and want to have control of their own oil, not a bunch of people who want to destroy &quot;the west&quot;. The cause of these &quot;religious wars&quot; and &quot;peacekeeping operations&quot; is mainly the interests of World Finance in oil around the Arabian Peninsula and the Persian Gulf.<br /><br />Certainly, retarded NatSocs may think that Islam is the enemy of the kikes and that &quot;the enemy of your enemy is your friend&quot;, but they don&#39;t really have a place in an intellectual argument or a decision-making process anyway.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 8d000ccb10e0d9948de8703c7159e85c0b92df04182ac7348c9734ef2b5c4ff1.ogg
Comment:
  America - A Horse With No Name<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;mp3</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;computer noises mislabeled &quot;music&quot;</span><br />Kill yourselves niggers. Post real music in a format that&#39;s always been FLOSS


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: a57ffc1ccf8416cd3e572bcf373e30eb9593f4f86345f1d88f582b1f7b6eaf29.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post15721'>&gt;&gt;15721</a><br />based<br /><a class='reference' href='#post15729'>&gt;&gt;15729</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;girl lets you sleep with other girl with her</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;uses PGP</span><br />where do i find this?


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4671'>&gt;&gt;4671</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;t. threatened</span><br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10331'>&gt;&gt;10331</a><br />This thread is less about tech and more about feel.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10331'>&gt;&gt;10331</a><br />Fork picochan and make it federated or decentralized then. Developing comfy JS free imageboard engines is a start.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4673'>&gt;&gt;4673</a><br />How many times are you going to post that video hakase


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7920'>&gt;&gt;7920</a><br />communism yes anarchy no<br />always so close but no cigar<br />white people


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7747'>&gt;&gt;7747</a><br />NOOOO that would require logic<br />POLK JUST SMASH<br />NO THINK THAT FOR NERD<br />POLK SMASH


Board: v
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  indie is when you take INDIE_GAME_ENGINE 6.3 and add a few sprites and now you have a le pixels game that&#39;s worse in every way than a dos game<br />indie is just a buzzword and corporate category. noone in the 2000s called themselves indie


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: National Socialism was a disaster for the german people
File: 013212ec43efa31ff2b8eccf635994b67fefd5a0fdcf56f8d91777acf41bd9dc.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7990'>&gt;&gt;7990</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Basically everybody here is uneducated.</span><br />Stop projecting.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Those shilling for lefty shit have derailed the topic and started arguing about the definition of &quot;nation&quot;.</span><br />Implying libertarianism has anything to do with the left.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;But pretty much everything you teach to a kid is indoctrination, so you should at least indoctrinate things that are good for the society</span><br />Education is brainwashing, it is today, just like it was in Nazi Germany, that&#39;s why the Hitler Youth existed, to brainwash people since they were kids, which is and was absolutely despicable, and fuck off with the &quot;good for the society&quot;, Hitler Youth was full of political indoctrination, basically a cult with Hitler at the center.<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Youth#Doctrine'>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Youth#Doctrine</a><br />So many of those innocent kids died cause they were brainwashed at a young age, very sad.<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Youth#World_War_II'>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Youth#World_War_II</a><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;In 1944, the 12th SS-Panzer-Division Hitlerjugend was deployed during the Battle of Normandy against the British and Canadian forces to the north of Caen. Nearly 20,000 German youths participated in the attempt to repulse the D-Day invasion; while they knocked out some 28 Canadian tanks during their first effort, they ultimately lost 3,000 lives before the Normandy assault was complete.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;&quot;The interests of the folk&quot;</span><br />&quot;The interests of the Nazi Party&quot;<br />ftfy<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;In Hitler&#39;s case, the German elements of Austria and Poland were being oppressed by the Slavs (Czechs and Poles respectively), so National Socialism was a way to bring those people back into one Reich to stand as one, free of outside influence.</span><br />Oh boi, that mental gymnastics. Hitler just want to expand his Reich that&#39;s it, he even made a deal with Stalin to split Poland in two. <a rel='noreferrer' href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact'>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact</a><br />And then he proceeded to invade Russia cause he had fantasies of power, how many germans lived in Russia to justify its invasion?<br />How many germans were in France to justify its invasion?<br />How many germans died in Germany cause of Hitler expansionism?<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The interests of National Socialism are to safeguard the wellbeing of the folk.</span><br />The interests of National Socialism are to safeguard the wellbeing of the Nazi Party members.<br />ftfy 2<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;By not relying on international finance, the economy can just go back to serving the people</span><br />Imagine being so ignorant. The purpose of economy is not to serve the people, that is was communists think, the purpose of economy is to offer a platform for the exchange of resources, products and services, it&#39;s the job of the goverment to serve the people, the economy should be independent from the goverment cause there is an abvious conflict of interests. This is why the Federal Reserve that you hate so much is independent of the US goverment, otherwise the goverment would just keep printing money until it ends up like Venezuela.<br />Try actually understanding how this stuff works, start by watching teh FOMC conference videos, there you go this is the Federal Reserve official youtube channel:<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://www.youtube.com/user/FedReserveBoard'>https://www.youtube.com/user/FedReserveBoard</a><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL159CD41EB36CFE86'>https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL159CD41EB36CFE86</a><br />International finance offers more competition, therefore better products and technological advancement, look at how Japan technology developed after they got out of isolationism.<br />Economic isolationism means becoming an outdated nation and losing to all others.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If the press is working to the detriment of the people, it will be DISCONTINUED.</span><br />If the press is working to the detriment of the Nazi Party, it will be DISCONTINUED.<br />ftfy 3<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;While it may seem paradoxical (if you follow the mainstream narrative) that a fascist state lets you think and act freely, those in the Third Reich actually had more freedom than we do today</span><br />It was like this:<br />you say something wrong, you are arrested by the Gestapo.<br />you dislike someone, you denounce them to the Gestapo so they get arrested.<br />Literally a panopticon.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You are free to do anything that isn&#39;t detrimental to the people</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You are free to do anything that isn&#39;t detrimental to the Nazi Party</span><br />ftfy 4


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Always Tired
File: b5874b4d6cb0e31512681401c04b31b44c1b411b0e50374a8c9d532c6651060c.jpg
Comment:
  I don&#39;t know why but lately I&#39;m always tired and demotivated, I spend my free time browsing imageboards and wasting my time staring at the void, I am always tired and sleepy and when I am not I am demotivated to do anything productive.<br />I wasn&#39;t always like this, I used to spend hours programming and learning new stuff.<br />Lately I always find myself at 2:00 AM saying to myself &quot;Oh another day is gone, now it&#39;s too late to do what I planned for the day...&quot; and I go to bed. My life is escaping from my control somehow...<br />Anyone else can relate?<br /><br />Help.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18113'>&gt;&gt;18113</a><br />There are objective facts and subjective opinions, not everything in the world can be explained and proved with scientific rigor. That&#39;s why there are different interpretation of the world and how society should be run.


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  ASMR thread deleted again.<br />OK faggot.<br />Do you want to know how it went? Asukafag kept spamming BlueKatie pics all over 4chan and nanochan, so I thought who is this semen demon? I reverse image searched and found her channel and I got into ASMR since hse is really good.<br />Whatever I&#39;ll go somewhere else, this imageboard is even more cucked than 4chan.<br />Bye.


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post6949'>&gt;&gt;6949</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;admitting to being a cuckchanner</span>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  At least you seem to enjoy imageboards. Nowadays I just open several imageboards and barely even look at them.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: eed8183d5723ebb7178d0cab0843c6ff26094216e3c2382432731ba06785b53e.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18122'>&gt;&gt;18122</a><br />Just using nanochan and waiting for 8kun to stop shitting the bed. <br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18120'>&gt;&gt;18120</a><br />Set yourself on a schedule and keep to it. It might suck for a while but it will get you back into the groove of things, just make sure to stick with it, through thick and thin. 


Board: v
Name: Nanonymous
File: 9e7802a831fe5b4ea5842784ff1e0a52e204b2db6cd1aeb24e6bc436113b88b0.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post1390'>&gt;&gt;1390</a><br />Yeah indie game dev teams are just start up companies now who are pushing low effort assets and mechanics out to become l33t gaym devs. <br /><br />Though if you&#39;re complaining about a lack in the market, this is your chance to make lots of money. 


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7997'>&gt;&gt;7997</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;the economy should be independent from the goverment</span><br />What would that even look like? Bare minimum, the government derives revenue by taxing the economy. Add on that much of the governments job is to regulate the economy, at least in modern western countries. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;the Federal Reserve is independent of the US goverment</span><br />&quot;independent&quot;. It&#39;s an arm of the government, congress makes a choice not to interfere too much. It was explicitly created because free market monetary policy doesn&#39;t work, so libertarians BTFO.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10331'>&gt;&gt;10331</a><br />Because muh CP.<br /><a class='reference' href='#post10340'>&gt;&gt;10340</a><br />Bad idea. Picochan&#39;s architecture, while flexible, isn&#39;t suited to true decentralization. Federation would be possible, maybe.<br />t.asukafag


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post6949'>&gt;&gt;6949</a><br />Asukafag, I will remind you that you do not have any rights on nanochan.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: 6bcd173dff465daad0ecb5a25f87aa61375ef3969e6ad1e400ed22758dc322bf.jpg
Comment:
  The correct answer to the holocaust question is &quot;Me Ne Frego&quot; - &quot;I don&#39;t care.&quot;<br /><br />I don&#39;t care whether it happened or not, because it&#39;s not my problem.<br /><br />Just as I do not care about the alleged plight of niggers, or the BLM movement, because it&#39;s not my problem.<br /><br />I care only about the interests of my White race.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;this is what we&#39;re all missing from the gay discord</span><br />avatars smdh


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  It&#39;s cool, Trump&#39;s here to enact USSR-level antisemitism prohibitions., just in time for the dems to retake power.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 3c250d33f8a798e6761b51da22239b8541fad988c2b5729b2a14cac53b0983a9.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18123'>&gt;&gt;18123</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;stop shitting the bed. </span><br />TOR hasn&#39;t worked from the beginning, and they refuse to acknowledge it, despite multiple people asking. It&#39;s never going to work.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7989'>&gt;&gt;7989</a><br />Is that the same dumbass that mentioned white supremacy is a huge problem as evidenced by the ones that shot-up that Kosher deli in New Jewsey?


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8000'>&gt;&gt;8000</a><br />witnessed<br /><span class='spoiler'>very based</span>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Spending time on developing a non-shit, non-JS board doesn&#39;t seem like a waste of time. Nano/Pico are proof-of-concepts that JS is not needed and should not be used.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18120'>&gt;&gt;18120</a><br />Try drinking mineral water, eating more fish and nuts.<br />It should help, at least temportally.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;&gt;What about whatsapp? Any tips on using this proprietary piece of shit?</span><br /><br />buy a google voice account on empire market and use that number to sign up for whatsapp. dont forget to change password and recovery email.


Board: pol
Name: Jordan Washington
Email: JW320@naacp.com
Subject: regreevences adressde
Comment:
  how fucckkin dare you white boi!!! we be tha originnle humanss and wee concured the worild.. we got bigga braainns mussles ann dickks than u.SO HSAA HA! HHA!


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt; He never figured out how to hide his power level</span><br />Sorry bro.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10079'>&gt;&gt;10079</a><br />so there&#39;s no way to scale i2p effectively? tor is the only solution?<br /><a class='reference' href='#post10088'>&gt;&gt;10088</a><br />wouldn&#39;t more adoption of i2p as a standard in torrent clients solve this?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10313'>&gt;&gt;10313</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;It has a client you can download, but it&#39;s just the website in a box (Electron).</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;in 2019, desktop application is now a website embedded in web browser engine</span><br />we need to kill all jews and NPC. mass murder. kill all web niggers, web devs. abuse entire internet, turn it off. we need to find Electron creators and electrocute them until they no longer breath. only violence is the solution<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  You might need to do some physical exercise. Make it a point to go on a walk, ride a bike, some type of movement every day to get the blood flowing. Humans aren&#39;t meant to be completely sedentary, it makes you depressed.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10184'>&gt;&gt;10184</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;DHCP needs an ID that won&#39;t change even if your MAC does.</span><br />Why? If my MAC changes, couldn&#39;t the DHCP server just treat me as a new connection? That&#39;s what my router does.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: 1320d90bfc8015675da965c61ef82ae3438a0f9949f4d870ea94707c2f1b6d05.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4681'>&gt;&gt;4681</a><br />Is it a <i>goon</i>? A <i>real</i> living, breathing &#39;goon&#39;?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: 3e085ce9d96899f2b4dcdb7965696672faa80aec8875725b7f37dc5d17f315c5.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10248'>&gt;&gt;10248</a><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;Copied from the ARM website</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Arm TrustZone is used on billions of applications&#39; processors to protect high-value code and data. It is frequently used to provide a security boundary for a GlobalPlatform Trusted Execution Environment.</span><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;TrustZone is built on Secure and Non-secure worlds that are hardware separated. The partitioning of the two worlds is achieved by hardware logic present in the AMBA bus fabric, peripherals and processors.</span><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;In order to implement a Secure state in the SoC, trusted software (Trusted OS) needs to be developed to make use of the protected assets. This code typically implements trusted boot, the Secure world switch monitor, a small trusted OS and trusted apps. The combination of TrustZone based hardware isolation, trusted boot and a trusted OS make up a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), which can be used alongside other security technology.</span>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10288'>&gt;&gt;10288</a><br />Could one be used to host a hidden tor chan? It&#39;s been claimed that Nanochan was originally hosted on an old laptop, maybe one of these would be adequate to do the same?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;It is frequently used to provide a security boundary for a GlobalPlatform Trusted Execution Environment.</span><br />Yes, it can be used to make a TEE. The raspberry pi does not use Arm TrustZone to make a TEE. They let you the user run code in the secure world. If you the user want to make a TEE you can do it.<br /><a class='reference' href='#post10352'>&gt;&gt;10352</a><br />Yes you can.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Because in the 80&#39;s and 90&#39;s their parents made tons of different BBS softwares.  They have inherited that trait. :-)


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10352'>&gt;&gt;10352</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Could one be used to host a hidden tor chan?</span><br />I don&#39;t see why not as long as you don&#39;t need lot computational power or storage for your server.


Board: l
Name: Santa Claus
Email: santa@northpole.party
Subject: Christmas thread
File: 3c98b848aab3c127dda9c31e643c8fae162045bd82475938391df016aa11da86.jpg
Comment:
  Ho, ho, ho!<br /><br />Greetings nanons my name is Santa Claus, have you been good this year?<br />If you&#39;ve been well behaved towards your parents and the mods during the year, then list in this thread what you want to receive for Christmas.<br />Asukafag you have been a very bad boi, you will receive coal this year, be better behaved in future and I might get you that hapa girlfriend you really want next year.<br /><br />Ho, ho, ho! I wish you all a Merry Christmas!<br /><br />- Santa Claus


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: f41c10a7547791aeaf2fb1f25f0d909ce0c73f072f332e8c5d1b70027e09b7f8.jpg
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;Why do people waste their time on reinventing...</span><br />Autism. And it is beautiful.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;Asukafag you have been a very bad boi</span><br />Don&#39;t be sad asukafag, you&#39;ll get one my finest hapamarus as a consolation wife. Trouble is I can&#39;t tell for sure if she&#39;s hapa. But then again neither can you.<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18132'>&gt;&gt;18132</a><br />It&#39;s pretty hard to stand with yourself


Board: a
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Конец.Евангелиона
Comment:
  magnet:?xt=urn:btih:1249c6ccbf434def942e8c58c3f047d02395718c&amp;dn=%5bDeadmau-%20RAWS%5d%20The.End.of.Evangelion.1997.Rus.Jap.BDRip.Deadmauvlad


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10344'>&gt;&gt;10344</a><br />Developing imageboard clients would be a better way to spend time. The web itself is pretty cancerous, not only the js part.<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  I was feeling like this too, to a point where I&#39;d get out of my chair and go lurk from bed because even jut sitting was tiresome. Then one day I biked around 7 kilometers. I got tired and sweaty, but had way more energy for the next few days. Get a bike, just go somewhere with it.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10184'>&gt;&gt;10184</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;DHCP needs an ID that won&#39;t change even if your MAC does.</span><br />No, you never need that.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;hurr durr muh authorities said otherwise this is the standard way you are wrong</span><br />shut the fuck up americunt<br /><a class='reference' href='#post10194'>&gt;&gt;10194</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;last reply</span><br />thank you<br /><a class='reference' href='#post10350'>&gt;&gt;10350</a><br />he&#39;s some fucking retarded sysadmin who thinks his retarded enterprise use cases are super important serious business


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Absolute facts
File: a80463242472faa01eca82c5416d495ebd80ba6c45ed4960bba3221f16049bd7.jpg
Comment:
  Hebephilia &gt; Ephebophilia &gt; Pedophilia<br />2D Ebes &gt; 3D Ebes &gt; 2D Ephebes &gt; 3D Ephebes &gt; 2D Lolis &gt; 3D Lolis


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  I want to download many pictures I have a list of urls for and also convert them all into a different format. <br />Curl can do batch downloads; imagemagick can do batch converting.<br />But how can I make it convert every single image the moment it is downloaded? I mean, so that I start getting converted output before all the images have been downloaded. <br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: bc7cb7fed4c095c163a6da6421ae1b1b7894795db649ba253e88f6e41f43507f.png
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;having to navigate these shiny buttons with the mouse</span><br />It hurts to think how much time I could have saved had it had keyboard control.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4689'>&gt;&gt;4689</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;difference between /b/ and /l/</span><br />The difference is quality (supposedly), higher quality in the lounge and lower quality on /b/.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;what&#39;s the file upload size limit</span><br />I&#39;m not sure, maybe 20MB.<br /><br />You probably should have posted this on &gt;&gt;&gt;/meta/.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  The ideal imageboard should be based on something like freenet, where noone is responsible for storing the content. Not on the current freenet implementation though


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='/meta'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/meta/</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/meta/.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/meta/,</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/meta/!</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/meta/?</span><br />


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: 2e9e18b9b7b6c7577d1029f894f5bc9f425427db3cfa23a3fc556b9957b92cd1.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4689'>&gt;&gt;4689</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4690'>&gt;&gt;4690</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What&#39;s the difference between /b/ and /l/ ?</span><br />/l/ is quality shitposting, /b/ is just shitposting.<br />Does that make sense?<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Also, what&#39;s the file upload size limit?</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I&#39;m not sure, maybe 20MB.</span><br />That is incorrect, upload limit is 16 MiB.


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  I&#39;m using:<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='http://nanochanpwz3xnue76gteysv6wjm5sim3bbcm2lc65x625at774k77qd.onion'>http://nanochanpwz3xnue76gteysv6wjm5sim3bbcm2lc65x625at774k77qd.onion</a><br />Does it matter?


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4690'>&gt;&gt;4690</a><br />Admin can move thread to /meta/ if he wants.<br />It would be helpful if max file size was listed in the post form itself <span class='spoiler'>I think it used to be, but can&#39;t remember</span><br />Anyway, I thought it was significantly higher than 20MB


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4692'>&gt;&gt;4692</a><br />Quality by who&#39;s subjective standards?


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4693'>&gt;&gt;4693</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Admin can move thread to /meta/ if he wants.</span><br />I don&#39;t think thread moving has been implemented yet.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4694'>&gt;&gt;4694</a><br />The censor&#39;s, lol.<br />


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4694'>&gt;&gt;4694</a><br />Erectodefunctors of course<br />Hes the one who keeps deleting threads claiming they are &#39;low quality&#39;


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4687'>&gt;&gt;4687</a><br />Stop touching yourself. Your hand is guided by Satan&#39;s and this is a Christian forum.<br />


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4696'>&gt;&gt;4696</a><br />Then I guess I&#39;ll stick with /b/ for general shitposting instead of risking being rulecucked by someone else&#39;s capriciousness sense of quality. 


Board: a
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: /c/ute
File: 4d1fc6c03284507f3fccac340d0c07308141a5c5c219da3e1d93cf6732535ad6.png
Comment:
  Post /c/ute anime grills.<br /><br />BORN TO HUG<br />WORLD IS A COOL<br />Cuddle them all 1999<br />I am a cute girl<br />410,757,864,530 NICE PEOPLE<br /><br />Remember that this is a nice board.<br />Niceposting is mandatory.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4698'>&gt;&gt;4698</a><br />It&#39;s not like you can get banned anyway. Use /l/ for serious discussions and blogging and use /b/ when you&#39;re feeling creative. (Green is not a creative colour.)<br />


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4699'>&gt;&gt;4699</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;can&#39;t get banned</span><br />How does kc ban Tor users then? I got a 24 hour ban from a butthurt mod once and I was using their v3 onion address:<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='http://kohlchanvwpfx6hthoti5fvqsjxgcwm3tmddvpduph5fqntv5affzfqd.onion'>http://kohlchanvwpfx6hthoti5fvqsjxgcwm3tmddvpduph5fqntv5affzfqd.onion</a>


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post6973'>&gt;&gt;6973</a><br />That is fine. Admin position was changed a couple of time to different persons, so also the onion domain name changed, you are gonna be redirected to that one regardless.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4700'>&gt;&gt;4700</a><br />Do you have a screenshot? The point of Tor is that they either ban all of it or none of it, so I&#39;d like to know how they could single you out.<br />


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4701'>&gt;&gt;4701</a><br />No, I don&#39;t have a screenshot, but it happened. If you doubt it, do something to get banned there. You do need to solve a captcha to post using Tor, so maybe it&#39;s some kind of cookie? Don&#39;t really know.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4700'>&gt;&gt;4700</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4701'>&gt;&gt;4701</a><br />The only way to ban on tor without javascript are cookies and user agent.<br />Clear cookies and storage, disable javascript, change user agent, click on new identity in tor browser.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10359'>&gt;&gt;10359</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;using 4chan terminology</span><br />go back zoomer


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4702'>&gt;&gt;4702</a><br />I wanted to see from the ban message if it was a ban singling you out somehow or a 24h Tor ban (which is much more likely).<br /><br />24h tor ban means everybody using Tor got banned, not just you.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10349'>&gt;&gt;10349</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post10360'>&gt;&gt;10360</a><br />Ironic caricatures are so adorable, I can&#39;t believe the commies want to take this from us.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4706'>&gt;&gt;4706</a><br />No, it was specifically for me. They even displayed my &quot;ID&quot; in the message that was a medium string of numbers.<br />It was not a general ban for Tor. The reason for my ban was that the mod simply didn&#39;t like a particular post, it didn&#39;t break any rules.<br />I don&#39;t know what to tell you. Go post something that will get you banned over there and find out. Just don&#39;t post anything illegal. Maybe spam some nigger cock or something idk


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  superiorchan doesn&#39;t have these problems<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='http://nanochangkn3dxfkr5prfw76hiq3qpjyzr44m4zxbwub5f4kditlufid.onion/pico/b'>http://nanochangkn3dxfkr5prfw76hiq3qpjyzr44m4zxbwub5f4kditlufid.onion/pico/b</a>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4713'>&gt;&gt;4713</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4705'>&gt;&gt;4705</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Go post something that will get you banned over there and find out.</span><br />Asukafag you&#39;re perfect for this mission, unironically. You hate being censored and you know tor well: go to KohlChan and check if they fingerprint posters.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: 37bde5869fa2106ac5d110ffc7fbe0f507b3c0be8cb2012501c60f609f70e9d0.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10355'>&gt;&gt;10355</a><br />With all of this talk about ARM TrustZone, maybe it would be of interest to create a script/recipe to build an RPi OS image that random people can load onto an SD card and it becomes a node for a distributed tor chan. For more robust storage, a USB2SATA and SSD could be used.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: 0e2037c74f035a52cd1ca0a7a3493a8c391993c60b3bf084ec5404285cf4c6af.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4681'>&gt;&gt;4681</a><br />What does that mean, fren? Also don&#39;t call me poomarufag or I ban you hurr.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17055'>&gt;&gt;17055</a><br />Asukafag is like Jessie Jackson, he claims to &quot;represent&quot; a community, but it turns out he&#39;s only representing himself and his multiple personalities.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17055'>&gt;&gt;17055</a><br />/b/ thread<br /><a class='reference' href='#post18142'>&gt;&gt;18142</a><br />this


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18139'>&gt;&gt;18139</a><br />Install a vim extension, nugget brain.<br />Or just use tab and enter.


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post6973'>&gt;&gt;6973</a><br />See <a rel='noreferrer' href='http://nanochanpwz3xnue76gteysv6wjm5sim3bbcm2lc65x625at774k77qd.onion/meta/8.html/#post6968'>http://nanochanpwz3xnue76gteysv6wjm5sim3bbcm2lc65x625at774k77qd.onion/meta/8.html/#post6968</a>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  According to <a rel='noreferrer' href='http://nanochanpwz3xnue76gteysv6wjm5sim3bbcm2lc65x625at774k77qd.onion/source.lua'>http://nanochanpwz3xnue76gteysv6wjm5sim3bbcm2lc65x625at774k77qd.onion/source.lua</a> the max file size is 16 MIB.


Board: v
Name: Nanonymous
File: 5f2999d46a98440d8b53e3fb383c07f471298796358c24bf1c72eea406bc8311.jpg
Comment:
  I think is worst when they justify their laziness lack of innovation on being &quot;indie&quot; and is worst in 2000s fangames that you mention, at least they were not for profit, now every shitty dev thinks they can become rich easily<br />we better go back when an indie game meant pic related


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  8values is as bad as it can get, it confuses liberty with democracy, tradition with anti-ecologism and for some reason you either have science or religion, never both. Could not expect more from a test made for retarded burgers


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4447'>&gt;&gt;4447</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;waiting in the bushes</span><br />It&#39;s Trayvon McNigger.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10313'>&gt;&gt;10313</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Facebook is for boomers.</span><br />so facebook is no longer trendy? will it die? or will young people today move to facebook when they get old?<br />but facebook company bought instagram so it won&#39;t die soon<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;SMS and calls are limited, but if you use a &quot;whatever&quot; (semi-burner) phone I guess it could be potentially untraceable.</span><br />how could it be untraceable when all mobile phones leak their location and who you talk to. they can also record your voice


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4719'>&gt;&gt;4719</a><br />It could be a modern day Romeo just as easily.<br />


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: efa0415c9fc7fc1404bb8742de5ba5e84ffc8cfc376b9b53b3eff4b1efc66afd.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7939'>&gt;&gt;7939</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;give money to africa</span><br />nice try schlomo


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18061'>&gt;&gt;18061</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What is Bitcoin mining and is it safe ? </span><br />what do you mean? ASICS? any electronics can kill you if the vendor wants.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18140'>&gt;&gt;18140</a><br />I also stand with asukafag<br />t. asukafag


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;What are some cool things to do with a Raspberry Pi / single board computer / lightweight Linux machine?</span><br />bomb detonator<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post10366'>&gt;&gt;10366</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;it becomes a node for a distributed tor chan.</span><br />who will own it? who will moderate it? who will delete spam? who will decide what is the policy for removal? who will post CP?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;decentralised imageboard?</span><br />who will own it? who will moderate it? who will delete spam? who will decide what is the policy for removal? who will post CP?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a rel='noreferrer' href='https://github.com/DonnchaC/onionbalance'>https://github.com/DonnchaC/onionbalance</a>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10366'>&gt;&gt;10366</a><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorawan'>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorawan</a><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://store.mcci.com/products/catena-4450-lorawan-iot-device'>https://store.mcci.com/products/catena-4450-lorawan-iot-device</a><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://github.com/BastilleResearch/gr-lora'>https://github.com/BastilleResearch/gr-lora</a><br /><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://www.open-mesh.org/'>https://www.open-mesh.org/</a><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freifunk'>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freifunk</a><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/'>http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/</a>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4698'>&gt;&gt;4698</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;capriciousness sense of quality</span><br />Postmodernist relativism on a imageboard? Give me a break.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post6319'>&gt;&gt;6319</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;threatens random Consooomer on Nano with DOTR</span><br /><br />You don&#39;t have any plan on how to ID them unless you&#39;re a contractor for the NSA. Scrub.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10372'>&gt;&gt;10372</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Who will own it</span><br />Anyone who wants to setup a node<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Who will moderate it</span><br />Node owners, or others picked by them.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Who will delete spam</span><br />Mods approve outgoing/incommimg messages/pictures. Could setup anti spam rules for text, all images need to be approved so CP isn&#39;t sent or received.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Who will decide what is the policy for removal</span><br />Each node has different rules, but each node can set reputation scores for every other node, so CP friendly nodes can be blacklisted.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Who will post CP</span><br />Degenerates that will be ostracized from reputable nodes.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7988'>&gt;&gt;7988</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8007'>&gt;&gt;8007</a><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;not being a genocidal psychopath = i must be a jew</span><br />Fucking hell<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The genocide of niggers and jews will come soon.</span><br />I wonder how do you know that. The way i see it the world is moving in the exact opposite direction


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10374'>&gt;&gt;10374</a><br />I personally wouldn&#39;t want to use long-range backhaul that isn&#39;t directed/focused point-to-point. Using standard short-range WiFi (or similar technologies) for local access would make it less likely to draw attention, because of widespread use by consumer devices.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8011'>&gt;&gt;8011</a><br />Not being the worlds dumping ground for failed states sounds like a good goal for which to strive. Developed nations don&#39;t need masses of low IQ, dependents. The immigration narrative is a farce. The only people that want to import people are far-left hook noses and politicians willing to buy votes with free gibs (major overlap of those two).


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: 839775c2516edd54d54ccb882f961c7b5eaef9a1e8aa9d38b3e04fba16e76bc8.gif
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8011'>&gt;&gt;8011</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;not donating billions of dollars to afrika = genocide</span><br />found the sjw


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  This is such a shitty theater, it&#39;s hard to imagine how anyone could take it seriously for a minute. Yet half the country do. I guess liberalism is a mental disease, and the inmates are now running the asylum. Trump is a fluke who isn&#39;t on their side, even though he has done fuck all for our side, but in any case even the president is just one man. Leftards now completely dominate the media, the corporate world, the schools, the unelected bureaucratic posts, even the military and police are lost.<br /><br />That said, this whole election cycle, starting with the primaries in spring &#39;16 when Trump was first seen as a serious candidate, has been a 4 year hissy fit of epic proportions. And as far as anyone can tell, the biggest so called crime Trump committed was having the temerity to not let <span class='kiketext'>(((them)))</span> get their way. Kavanaugh, Stormy, the taxes, countless other manufactured Trump &quot;scandals&quot; were all fake as fuck. Obama did not have to deal with a tenth of this shit despite being objectively worse, nor did Bush, or any president in history except the ones who got shot. Even for those, it was a one time event by a small group of people, not a sustained, unabated tantrum participated in by 100+ million people.<br /><br />Granted, the retards who still vote blue probably don&#39;t see it, but a good chunk of the other half of the country does. Boomers will probably try to cuck out as usual, but the new generations will have to either revolt or die. So I&#39;d say we have 50/50 chance of actually getting the accelerationist ending.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;Why would anybody pick any ideology over libertarianism?</span><br />It is literally an unfit, weak ideology.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What could possibly be better than a simple live and let live?</span><br />Without even getting into its own merits as an ideology, we can immediately see that any idea, religion, ideology, scientific theory, art movement, anything, that doesn&#39;t aggressively force itself on others is at a huge disadvantage against others who do. It is a classic prisoner&#39;s dilemma and the libertarian wants to trust an authoritarian who will defect at first chance. This is in simple, peaceful, civilized society with no violence.<br /><br />If you consider this on the national scale, you must also worry about non-libertarian governments trying to subjugate you. If you permit everything, and they permit only things that increase their power, guess who wins?<br /><br />Even assuming that libertarianism is a flawless ideology, just this alone will make it tend to die out over time, just like a species which has 1 child per family will lose to one that has 10, absent some extreme factor counteracting this (very few things can). But libertarianism also has flaws.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Flaw 1: Shit movement</span><br />Libertarians today have no real outlet. All the libertarian politics are trash. The politicians are either degenerates, crypto-liberals or corporate whores. Besides being utterly uninspiring, none of these even care about libertarian principles. They just want as much degeneracy as possible, pathologic altruism and unbridled kikery respectively.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Flaw 2: Known ideological holes</span><br />Every ideology can have gaps in its logic, but for the ones that succeed, at least the followers are not aware of them and can easily suspend disbelief and meme it as the perfect solution to everything. This can be done with retarded followers (mudslimes, pajeets, niggers) or the flaws being very subtle. Libertarianism/minarchism/ancap has glaring holes like who will pay for roads/police/schools/hospitals. I know there are libertarian solutions to these, but the average person just sees &quot;durr everything used to be free now we&#39;ll have to pay&quot;. It doesn&#39;t matter whether there actual logic holes, it matters that the average tard npc can feel like their basic needs would be easily addressed under the new system. The libertarian solutions are too complicated (doesn&#39;t help no familiar, working examples exist) and most people ignore them.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I think that for a person to be able to desire anything else there must be some assumption that he knows better than the general population.</span><br />I can safely say I know better than most of the population and I won&#39;t be bragging. The &quot;population&quot; includes millions of niggers, women, boomers, children, drug addicts, hobos and other assorted trash. Of course I know better than these so called &quot;people&quot;, who doesn&#39;t? Moreover, literally half of this population has double digit IQ. Think on that for a moment.<br /><br />Sure, just because I have above average intelligence and knowledge in my areas of expertise, doesn&#39;t mean I know everything about every area and can&#39;t ever make mistakes. But a brainless nigger who has no intelligence, no knowledge, no expertise in anything and no desire to even seek these things, does not know better than me what should be done with him, or me. Anything else is living in a fantasy world, fuck that.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;watching movies in 2019</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;still being surprised at nigger cunt shoe in a major commercial picture</span><br />What, did you think <span class='kiketext'>((((hollywood)))</span> would be taken aback by the sanctity of the Bond franchise, and leave it alone?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Most people who use imageboards are retards, and most admins who run them are petty, power-hungry narcissists. Any time you increase the barrier of entry, you exponentially reduce your pool of brainless, drooling sycophants aka &quot;users&quot;. Trying to make some decentralized autism shit would be suicide when most people these are phoneposting.<br /><br />The small minority of non-retards by and large hate other users, seemingly even more than they hate normies. So there is no reason for them to apply their talents to creating a channel of communication with people they hate.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10375'>&gt;&gt;10375</a><br />Too complicated.  And also they already have spam systems for stuff like email and usenet, but spam still gets through.  It becomes an arms race to patch holes from exploits, and the system keepts growing and become more complicated and bloated.  Also your definition of what&#39;s degenerate isn&#39;t going to be the same as someone else&#39;s.  Not everyone draws a line in the same place.  Also not everyone is subject to the same laws.<br />


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: ad91a9dca2f34bf3bf256118b07a04f236469f8ec4cc3a1b4754337e21215486.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8014'>&gt;&gt;8014</a><br />I`ve seen your other posts around /pol/, Nanon, and I am curious as to what other concessions you have. Seems like you`re the only other Nanon who doesn`t just make &quot;Okay Mossad&quot; posts, and actually brings substance to the discussion. We`ve talked a little before, for reference I was the Nanon who first replied to the &quot;How do we deal with Niggers thread.&quot; Would you consider yourself an accelerationist? 


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8014'>&gt;&gt;8014</a><br />Well said.<br />I disagree on the part about boomers though, boomers are split.<br />Boomers (and Gen-X) have Qanon (even if it&#39;s bs) and some are a variant of center-right.<br />Don&#39;t forget though that Trump is just an old-style 80&#39;s New York Democrat, but seems &quot;right-wing&quot; according to the new Dem standards.<br />And Europeans think the Dems are right-wing, lmao.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Leftards now completely dominate the media</span><br />Leftards only dominate the MSM, not the alt-media (ie those on YouTube, BitChute).<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Obama, Bush did not have to deal with this</span><br />This is why I sometimes think there is a conscious or at the very least systemic &quot;agenda&quot;.<br />Whether the end-game is a unitary slave race of 100% mixed ethnicity and the abolition of borders, culture, and personal freedom or just a bunch of power &amp; money hungry assholes who just get to do what they want, or somewhere in between, remains to be seen.<br />Others (Qanon &amp; friends) maintain that the agenda is communistic leftism that wants to take over, and/or a secret santanic pedo-elite cabal.<br />However, I find that most of the people that believe that don&#39;t actually know what those words mean/what those things are (IE they believe satanism is devil worship).


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: 4eccb627a39e411ef5eff7aa330a4a614aa1c34b5a82190d1f85d99f39a970ed.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8017'>&gt;&gt;8017</a><br />I wouldn&#39;t say so, as I don&#39;t do shit to accelerate myself. My favorite ending would be the one where h&#39;whites wake up and one day, for no reason at all, they elect hitler II, who actually finishes the job this time - which I recognize as an impossible fantasy. If we see a civil war in our lifetime, it would probably suck so bad we would pine for our current march of degeneracy and browning. But much as it would suck for us, it would suck for the npcs even worse.<br /><br />We are like an enormous boulder at the top of a huge mountain. The boulder has just tipped over the last stop. In my opinion, that final tipping was the combination of Trump getting elected and totally cucking out from literally day 1 when he filled his cabinet with <span class='kiketext'>(((deep state)))</span>. The huge boulder will roll slowly at first, as it gathers momentum against its inertia, but there is nothing we can do anymore to stop it. It will accelerate regardless of what we do and it will end up at the bottom no matter what.<br /><br />However, there is still uncertainty about which exact path it will take. One could see that depending on the exact topography and luck, it could roll down a steep, rocky gorge and conclude in a thundering crash, breaking to pieces. Or it could go a little bit to the other side, where the mountain face lazily stretches in a gentle slope. A boring path that takes forever and ends with it stuck half-submerged in a mud basin.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Seems like you`re the only other Nanon who doesn`t just make &quot;Okay Mossad&quot; posts</span><br />Well, it&#39;s a board anyone can post on. Our best bet is to use this as a rally point and organize a network of people communicating through peer to peer means like email and im, which won&#39;t collapse because of one hosting provider banhammering it. 


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Just a reminder that the <i>old guard</i> of the present are from the post World War II generation. This would be Vietnam War generation in the US and reconstruction/socialism generation in Europe. In the US, the Left and Right from that generation hate each other more so than the prior one, there was no total war scenario and many on the left had Communist sympathies.<br /><br />The WWII generation is almost gone. If you look at the veterans that remain, they&#39;re all in their 90s, 1945 was 74 years ago.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8015'>&gt;&gt;8015</a><br />This is a infantile view of what libertarianism means, and takes it completely to the logical literal extreme, rather than a realistic relative one.  I say this as not even a libertarian ir ancap.<br /><br />Libertarianism does not imply anti-stateism or total pacifism.<br />Minarchism exists.<br /><br />Libertarianism does not necessarily mean no taxes.<br /><br />It just means, in the most simple way, a minimization of regulatory burden and abuse where possible, and allowing, wherever possible, for people to do their own thing and thus be responsible for themselves and their own actions without intervention.<br /><br />It doesn&#39;t mean no borders either.<br /><br />It seems like you took at a cursory glance at what ancaps believe (without debating with any), then the current US Libertarian Party, and based what you said off of that.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;a brainless person who has no intelligence, no knowledge, no expertise in anything and no desire to even seek these things, does not know better than me what should be done with him, or me.</span><br />Who the hell are you to tell brainless guy what do, so long as he is not victimizing anyone?


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10701'>&gt;&gt;10701</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; Erotic anoreceptive activities very often involve a combination of considerable girth and vigorous thrusting, which is highly likely to result in significant anorectal injury especially with a prolonged duration (although anal stretching alone can easily and immediately result in permanent muscular damage as well). Pornography featuring such activities is rampant, and such abuse should be considered severely criminal when more than one person is involved. This situation is facilitated by widespread ignorance (often willful), apathy, and misinformation about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and especially the traumatic risks of erotic anoreceptive activities.</span><br /><a class='reference' href='#post11176'>&gt;&gt;11176</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; &quot;big porn&quot; and its considerable negative influence on societies worldwide — which seems to be one elephant in the room that few want to seriously discuss, much less work to actively combat</span><br /><a class='reference' href='#post11201'>&gt;&gt;11201</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; I think we have a combination of matters that people would rather avoid discussing: add in rampant erotic anorectal abuse, especially the traumatic risks and consequences of erotic anoreceptive activities, and anorectal anatomy and physiology... People are all too willing to become sidetracked by frivolous and irrelevant topics.</span><br /><a class='reference' href='#post11133'>&gt;&gt;11133</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; People will have to seriously address these matters at some point.</span><br />I could write so many different things here. Instead I will settle on this: There is no point to fighting for greater matters when humanity does not deserve to survive.<br />


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: e6238f47be448a1d13ab00b12e8900d82f9747635e44a58b5fc607dbd559ed96.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8018'>&gt;&gt;8018</a><br />IMO boomers have experienced too much good times. From 40s to 90s it was a fucking perpetual home run for them. That would explain why they are so self-destructive - maybe they really did get tired of winning. Even in 2000s when things started going to shit, the boomers had accumulated enough wealth and status that they could easily insulate themselves from the negative aspects of globohomo. They won&#39;t go against the system because they see the system as the source of all good, something that nourished and protected them their whole lives, the way a newborn views his mother&#39;s tit. If any are unlucky enough to see the hard times in full swing, they will discover that they lack all skills to cope with them and are too old to learn. They are useless due to their rotted brains. Even if they are nominally on your side they will only ever sabotage your efforts.<br /><br />If a Gen-X partakes in qfaggotry, they are to be considered honorary boomers as well. But some are waking up. It is hard for them, growing up without internet and brainwashed by boomer msm. They are used to thinking of corporations as evil, but they see government as a neutral force that causes harm out of incompetence, not malice. Of course their assumption is that if they just vote and campaign and sue hard enough, they can easily make the current system benefit them. This combination makes them susceptible to socialistic thinking. If shit really hits the fan though, they will be the best poised to survive due to their experience living in pre-internet days.<br /><br />Millenials grew up just as the boomers were dropping their fat steaming turd on the civilized west. Zoomers are growing up in full clown world. Both grew up with the internet and believe in thinking for themselves (not all succeed). But if SHTF and services are kill, they will be the most confused. Unfortunately, even zoomers are a product of good times. We see the hard times only in the future, and that&#39;s only the thinking minority. The present could be better, but so far we&#39;ve still had it pretty good as far as basic biological needs. We, still, are not the hard men that will emerge from the hard times. The hard times have only just begun.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;This is why I sometimes think there is a conscious or at the very least systemic &quot;agenda&quot;.</span><br />I think the agenda is very simple and nothing new: The powerful elite want to become even more rich and powerful by fucking us ordinary people. Because these days democracy is in vogue, they say whatever the masses want to hear to accomplish their goal of obtaining power and wealth. <br /><br />Trump, being one such elite, told us a story that was completely irrelevant to his actual goals of increasing power and wealth through mutual backrubs with other elites. What we saw in 2016 was not enmity between candidates, it was rivalry over who will jew the goyim better. That they took opposing ideological positions was not because they sincerely have different ideas about how things should be. They all have the exact same idea of how things should be: With them in charge. Rather, the disagreement is merely over which lie will best fool the normalcattle.<br /><br />And if you think about it, it was never not like this.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8021'>&gt;&gt;8021</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;infantile view of what libertarianism means</span><br />Which many people share, which exactly answers OP&#39;s question of why anyone would pick another ideology.<br /><br />Are we discussing here the purest, most theoretically advanced version libertarianism, or libertarianism as it is subscribed to by real people in the real world? Because a lot of those people would activate your recreational nukes even harder than the post you replied to.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;a minimization of regulatory burden and abuse where possible</span><br />This is a meaningless definition. All systems claim to reduce burden and abuse. Even communists would say that they want to minimize regulatory abuse (by staffing the state with Good Honest Working Class Communists).<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;allowing, wherever possible, for people to do their own thing and thus be responsible for themselves and their own actions without intervention</span><br />Now this is just dumb, you have no business calling anyone infantile with such kumbaya-tier basic bitch &quot;definitions&quot;. If libertarianism is &quot;plz guize just leeb me alone :&#39;(((&quot; like you say, then what distinguishes it from the 1,001 flavors of liberalism? Who gets to decide what is your responsibility because it&#39;s due to your action, and what is due to someone else&#39;s actions? If I buy a 10-yard strip of stream, divert it, and tell all the farmers downstream to get fucked lol, is that okay because, like, just build your own private stream dude? Or are we back to not allowing indirect harm, which means my neighbor can sue me over my dog farting too loudly? Or if no intervention basically means no police/court/law then are we gonna have private police agencies yet? Aaand we&#39;ve now arrived at the logical black hole that sits right in the middle of this &quot;ideology&quot; and sucks all energy out of any would be proponent.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Libertarianism does not necessarily mean no taxes.</span><br />But it is the single biggest common point among people who call themselves libertarians. That and dude weed lmao.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Who the hell are you to tell brainless guy what do, so long as he is not victimizing anyone?</span><br />lmao well played<br /><br />For the rest of you following along at home, here&#39;s a little brain puzzle to get your noggin joggin: Two men are debating. One man says brainlets should listen to smarter people. The other one says &quot;leave brainlets alone, he a gud boi, he dindu nuffin!&quot;. Can you guess which man is the brainlet? Tune in next time to find out!


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  A lot of old floppy disks from the 80&#39;s still work today, so you should use those instead of modern HDD or SSD.  I mean, create brand new floppy disks using the exact same method as the 80&#39;s.  The mid 90&#39;s and later floppy disks were made in China with much worse reliability (they soon went bad, even sometimes after just a few writes).


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17637'>&gt;&gt;17637</a> <br />What if it&#39;s her pee inside her bum while you fuck her?


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18149'>&gt;&gt;18149</a> <br />Pornography in general should be illegal. Not just the kinds you don&#39;t like.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;7614</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Also it is argued that there are two kinds of people, ones who tried cocaine and ones who didn&#39;t, with former having irreversible craving for more even if they have good self-control.</span><br /><br />This is not true. I have tried cocaine and did not get addicted to it. What&#39;s probably true is people that are naturally narcissistic become addicted to it. My experience was that of a euphoric feeling, but also of a notably false sense of feeling too good about yourself. Increased heart rate too, like you just finished running a mile. The <i>narcissistic high</i> turned me away, because it became quite clear what that would do in the long run. If you&#39;ve ever been around cokeheads, you&#39;ll know what I&#39;m describing. While some describe alcohol as <i>liquid courage</i>, coke is <i>powdered confidence</i>.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8021'>&gt;&gt;8021</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;and thus be responsible for themselves and their own actions without intervention</span><br /><br />Hate to tell you, but there are people in this world that refuse to be responsible for their own actions. For example, go tell an alcoholic, who also chain smokes, that they&#39;re killing themselves and nobody else should have to pay for their medical liabilities that will likely incur later on in life. Many of them wont like hearing that.<br /><br />Do you know who those people vote for?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10378'>&gt;&gt;10378</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Anything beyond a centralised web server  is too complicated </span>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;shitty normalfag (peasant) porn</span><br />Alright, what porn would you recommend as high-quality and non-normalfag?


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post11226'>&gt;&gt;11226</a><br />What if in actuality, nobody really watches cuckold porn (outside of a few weirdos), but is mainly used to troll people?


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post16619'>&gt;&gt;16619</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;запятая перед because</span><br />русский не палится


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 6e10dabc2e852d2b0939dd6ad9ce39cc84a3d69ac94fc4a11c34bd1b848800e2.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post16616'>&gt;&gt;16616</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Fuck thats a lot of makeup</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What a thot, i hope she gets in a fire and dies or at least ends up severely disfigured so that she gets a taste of the real world</span><br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post11765'>&gt;&gt;11765</a><br />Here is a shorter summary:<br /><br />The human anorectum is very unsuited for many all-too-common receptive activities. That is due to the fragility of the region. Anatomy is one factor: not very far inside there is very delicate and pain-insensate tissue (including simple columnar epithelium, a lining that some enemas and lubricants can damage or even remove). Neuromuscular physiology is another factor: the internal anal sphincter is involuntary and relaxes with rectal distension, while the external anal sphincter and puborectalis completely relax as a person bears down, causing hemorrhoidal cushions to engorge and increasing the cushions&#39; fragility.<br /><br />There are many traumatic consequences of such activities, variously serious, chronic, and permanent. Among them are anal and rectal tears; damage to muscle and connective tissue (stretched and/or torn); colorectal perforation; hemorrhoidal disease, including internal hemorrhoidal prolapse; rectal prolapse (originating from further inside); inflammation; and bacterial infection. All of those can lead to even more issues, such as abscess, fistula, life-threatening systemic sepsis, and fecal incontinence (secondary to injury or tertiary, for example as a complication of a fistula).<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18151'>&gt;&gt;18151</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; Pornography in general should be illegal.</span><br />That is your opinion, and also a red herring: this thread is about anal sex and pornography featuring anoreceptive activities. Granted, the original poster was probably trolling and definitely exaggerating. The thread prompted some discussion regardless, and I just had to wade in.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; Not just the kinds you don&#39;t like.</span><br />That is another red herring: what I like or dislike is irrelevant. The matters that I posted about in this thread (matters that people here and elsewhere simply refuse to think about seriously, much less earnestly attempt to address) are so much more important than anything about one lone and very fed-up individual.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10378'>&gt;&gt;10378</a><br />What I described isn&#39;t too far off from how the pre-Internet, inter-BBS worked.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10380'>&gt;&gt;10380</a><br />Sounds like reddit logic, <i>the front page of the Internet</i>, all nice and centralized.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  No idea, but not much if you do not have any opioid tolerance. Why do you ask? Are you going to put a bag of it in a presser-cooker bomb?


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 2aba16e1dc752a76d369040d8224a7afb028e08cca1a8857280f3c5985073fde.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18159'>&gt;&gt;18159</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Are there any onion based language translators, that don&#39;t use javascript?</span>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post16108'>&gt;&gt;16108</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;tfw no Anonymous hacker boicpucci gf</span>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10381'>&gt;&gt;10381</a><br />The thing about FidoNet (and BBS in general) is that activity was inherently slow.  Sysop could easily manually handle text spam by himself, and he could manually validate all files before they got listed in downloads.  Also if someone spammed, he could just lock their account.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10381'>&gt;&gt;10381</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post10383'>&gt;&gt;10383</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What I described isn&#39;t too far off from how the pre-Internet, inter-BBS worked.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The thing about FidoNet (and BBS in general) is that activity was inherently slow.</span><br />Cringe at zoomers talking about things they don&#39;t know about, like usual.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;Why do people waste their time on reinventing car engines, when they could invest it into developing a teleportation device?</span><br />You tell me bucko.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: &gt;tfw freedooms
File: 0932dc42437bf41f7000cc57b1269825220297b6bfabfea8d82518d39e2d3bd5.jpg
Comment:
  Henlo,<br />Just wanted to tell yuo that I&#39;ve just bought my first librebooted thiccpad and I couldn&#39;t be happier!<br />I love you all hope you have a wonderful day and life and everything!<br />also fuck kikes and glowies


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18162'>&gt;&gt;18162</a><br />based memebooter<br />remember, opsec is a process<br />just because you have libreboot doesn&#39;t mean you&#39;re done<br />also, you should put write protections in place to prevent evil maid attacks


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18163'>&gt;&gt;18163</a><br />Yeah I know, but this is a big step forward for me anyway, from botneted, proprietary BIOS with lots of ingsoc things to this, although I&#39;m a little skeptical about that libreboot since you know, you can&#39;t trust anyone really, maybe gonna update it or something soon


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 854e294e805b03c22fcf7bd9ddf2f851d715bd9459a8a59be484df0775b5ca91.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18164'>&gt;&gt;18164</a><br />Yeah, that came out a little ruff. Congrats. The current stable version is very old and might have some vulnerabilities but it&#39;s definitely better than the confirmed vulnerabilities of traditional BIOS. There is a new and reworked version (supposedly) coming soon.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8021'>&gt;&gt;8021</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;It just means a minimization of regulatory burden and abuse where possible, and allowing, wherever possible, for people to do their own thing and thus be responsible for themselves and their own actions without intervention.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;It doesn&#39;t mean no borders either</span><br />In that case, it means nothing at all. &quot;reduce regulatory burden, where possible&quot; is a statement that literally everyone agrees on. They just have wildly different views of what constitutes &quot;possible&quot;. Libertarians hold that radically few situations deserve regulation. They forget that every regulation is written in blood, in order to solve some problem or fight some excess of society. It doesn&#39;t follow that any more than a few need to be repealed. Of course, it has nothing to do with &quot;forgetting&quot;. They decide ahead of time that everything the government does is bad, and then fill in a bunch of post-hoc reasoning to justify it. On very rare occasions their reasoning ends up being right, through luck rather than process, but the vast majority of the time libertarian arguments are complete nonsense. This is why you find the majority of libertarians supporting idiotic ideas, because once poor reasoning is allowed, it will expand to fill the ideology. And as soon as the argument is allowed to comes after the conclusion, poor reasoning will seep in. One needs to start out from solving problems faced, and find the best possible solutions to them, which often as not involves adding new regulations instead of abolishing old ones. You cannot start from a wholly general solution like libertarianism, and force every problem you come across to fit it. Your reasoning will sound perfectly fine to yourself, but everyone you meet will think you sound like an idiot. And if you&#39;ve attached yourself to an ideology like libertarianism, you will be incapable of understanding why they don&#39;t get it, thinking them the idiot.<br /><br />Compare attaching yourself to an ideology like national socialism. The core of this is a definition of what sorts of thing will be considered &quot;problems&quot; worthy of government intervention, being any time the people of a nation are kept from their culture or their best interest. Such an ideology can also put forward poor reasoning, but it will correct it as soon as the mistake is pointed out, since it is not attached to solutions, only to problems. Libertarians cannot do this, since their mistake is buried at the heart of their beliefs, and the only way to fix it would be to throw off libertatianism itself.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18165'>&gt;&gt;18165</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18166'>&gt;&gt;18166</a><br />for real tho<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The latest stable release is 20160907, released on 2016-09-07</span><br />thanks what happens when you cut off the peepee, heh


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18167'>&gt;&gt;18167</a><br />thats*<br />sry Im so fuckn excited right nao


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18169'>&gt;&gt;18169</a><br />idk yet, so far I was thinking about something like Qubes or Hyperbola, what would you recommend?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10385'>&gt;&gt;10385</a><br />Shit meme, means you have shit for brains.  In case you didn&#39;t realize, BBS only accomodaate one user per line before they all ended up on Internet via telnet.<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18170'>&gt;&gt;18170</a><br />Know that Qubes can be too much for your hardware.<br />Hyperbola is fine but I prefer rolling release distros.<br />I value minimalism so I&#39;m trying to install openrc parabola on my laptop now but I&#39;m having some troubles.<br />Ultimately your choice doesn&#39;t really matter so just pick the one with the best looking neofetch logo.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18171'>&gt;&gt;18171</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Ultimately your choice doesn&#39;t really matter so just pick the one with the best looking neofetch logo.</span><br />heh xD<br />nah it does matter for some distros, i.e. Trisquel had packages from 2013 in 2017


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18172'>&gt;&gt;18172</a><br />Well then, my recommendation is either openrc parabola, gentoo or *BSD.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: SAGE!
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18173'>&gt;&gt;18173</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18174'>&gt;&gt;18174</a>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18123'>&gt;&gt;18123</a><br />What I need is to just leave the big city. They&#39;re absolutely soul-crushing.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18176'>&gt;&gt;18176</a><br />Stop listening to the exercise and schedule fucks. While they are correct, this is not the time to get into the never ending loop. Once your life starts to stagnate, BREAK IT. Sell all your useless shit and go somewhere else. Go live in another country or go do something you&#39;ve always wanted to do. Just get out of your situation and do something radically different. Don&#39;t make excuses because you have muh responsibilities, fuck other people. Just stop everything and start living. You will fall in the right place soon enough.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18151'>&gt;&gt;18151</a><br />Posting on imageboards should be illegal.<br /><a class='reference' href='#post18153'>&gt;&gt;18153</a><br />Normalfag porn is fat sunbured women with breast implants. All because some murica kids were like &quot;woahhh look how big her boobs are totally rad&quot; from the 70s to the 90s, and some women actually started thinking this is what men consider attractive. Another theme of normalfag porn is &quot;barely legal&quot;, which still has ugly women but they have buzzwords. Retards on 4cuck literally post saying they get off to braces and tan lines.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 286d14c89e56277cd34dd761e43b8dfd9b48b0c478f97262cc5130d57cfc5992.png
Comment:
  actually, can someone tell me how to run TempleOS on this thing (just for lulz)?<br />been trying but all the boot options are just based on &quot;search for isolinux&quot;<br />also can&#39;t run puppy linux because of that i guess


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18180'>&gt;&gt;18180</a><br />Never done it but I think you need to use SeaBIOS<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://github.com/bibanon/Coreboot-ThinkPads/wiki/Compiling-Libreboot-with-SeaBIOS'>https://github.com/bibanon/Coreboot-ThinkPads/wiki/Compiling-Libreboot-with-SeaBIOS</a>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10384'>&gt;&gt;10384</a><br />You do realize that those of which you speak like centralization, it allows easier control by a smaller force. Now why don&#39;t you go off and be a nice jewish boy somewhere else.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10330'>&gt;&gt;10330</a><br />It&#39;s so stupid. Archivecaslytosk.onion requires reCaptcha to view any archived webpages, archive.ph requires reCaptcha just to view homepage.<br /><br />Are there any archive sites that don&#39;t require javascript now?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10390'>&gt;&gt;10390</a><br />archive.org<br />prefix URL with <a rel='noreferrer' href='http://web.archive.org/web/'>http://web.archive.org/web/</a><br />saving worked at one point too


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18084'>&gt;&gt;18084</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;independent communication channel</span><br />...?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10254'>&gt;&gt;10254</a><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;he uses bash</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;he hasn&#39;t blocked all (outbound) non-tor traffic in his firewall</span>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10391'>&gt;&gt;10391</a><br />Thanks nanon, didn&#39;t know about that.<br /><br />Also, seems I was wrong about archive.ph. For some exit nodes/IPs everything loads fine with no Cloudflare &quot;security checks&quot;.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post9468'>&gt;&gt;9468</a><br />I assume putting &quot;-&quot; before an option blacklists it, but I couldn&#39;t find that in the ssh_config(5) man page. What minimum version of OpenSSH does this work for?<br /><br />This guide is slightly dated (last updated Nov 2017) but still great:<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://stribika.github.io/2015/01/04/secure-secure-shell.html'>https://stribika.github.io/2015/01/04/secure-secure-shell.html</a>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10395'>&gt;&gt;10395</a><br />It&#39;s at least in OpenSSH_8.1p1.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Multiple  algorithms  must  be</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;comma-separated.   If the specified list begins with a `+&#39; character, then the specified</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;methods will be appended to the default set instead of replacing them.  If the specified</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;list  begins with a `-&#39; character, then the specified methods (including wildcards) will</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;be removed from the default set instead of replacing them.</span><br />


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/78</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/4728</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/5000</span>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='/b/78.html'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/78</a><br /><a class='reference' href='/b/4728.html'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/4728</a><br /><a class='reference' href='/b/5000.html'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/5000</a>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='/b/Parent.html/#post78'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/78</a><br /><a class='reference' href='/b/Parent.html/#post4728'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/4728</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/5000</span>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='/b/78.html'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/78</a><br /><a class='reference' href='/b/78.html/#post4728'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/4728</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/b/5000</span>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10385'>&gt;&gt;10385</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post10386'>&gt;&gt;10386</a><br />Ok boomer


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18163'>&gt;&gt;18163</a> <br />For me free software is more about ethics tbh


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10389'>&gt;&gt;10389</a><br />Yes, nanochan is nice and centralized. I sure like sakamoto-san deleting every 20th post I make to ensure I keep proper posture.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Because any goddamn moron can learn html and some simple framework (they are all alike) or cgi. It takes literally no thinking to create an imageboard. <br />But building a decentralized imageboard, now that&#39;s not easy. Federation may be quite a bit simpler than some sophisticated p2p trickery, but it&#39;s still not even remotely as easy as outputting some markup language.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;Drumpf</span><br /><a class='reference' href='#post7971'>&gt;&gt;7971</a><br />Seconded since he HASN&#39;T ACTUALLY BEEN IMPEACHED OP NIGGER.<br /><br />He has been impeached in the house. Which is far from objective in the matter. Now if the Senate impeaches him, Dems might actually stand a chance of winning 2020. As it stands now; no way in hell.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: ? T H E E N D ?
File: b7cd517122c6cf4dc692a48b9ad0e63bfbc7ded3c865ed6155c11b4beb2be653.png
Comment:
  ATTENTION / T H E E N D / USERS!<br /><br />The site has been taken down for unknown reasons, however we refuse to allow our beautiful community to die.<br /><br />We&#39;re hosting an IRC server where the survivors can gather and discuss the future of / T H E E N D /. You can find it here:<br />Host: 4rmkikehcevaowtnhuz5qwzkjw7hxrxa5h64jhouw44j653gfyjqbrqd.onion<br />Port: 6667<br />Channel: #theend<br /><br />hleb is gay


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Good day to you, Saint Nicholas. I would like:<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;some J-K flip flops (any kind is fine as long as they&#39;re the kind you can put in a breadboard)</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;an onahole (sufficient to accommodate my girth and length - I doubt you need specifications, though)</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;An abundance of water based sexual lubricant</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;a girl - not a girlfriend, mind - who shall be kept in my closet and always smells like fresh sweat. She should also have a light amount of body hair but be completely unshaven</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;a function/wave generator</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;a cure for my physical debilitations</span><br />I don&#39;t know whether I ask too much, or what your standards for naughty or nice are, so I send you this list without any reservation, for you to read or discard at your own judgement.<br />Sincerely,<br />Nanon


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10402'>&gt;&gt;10402</a> <br />Most modern frameworks make it next to impossible to accidentally allow xss


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Mr.Wagecuck<br /><br />Return everyday<br />Stale pasta won&#39;t pay<br />Years of work, misery that rots<br />The mind of Mr.Wagecuck<br /><br />Twist and squirm<br />Until you weep<br />Thousands of cascades<br />Full of tears<br />Yearn those nights<br />Where you would shine<br />As the brightest Sol among all stars<br /><br />Not &#39;cause your brains<br />Nor for your brawns<br />Rather for being<br />A delusional clown<br /><br />Who thought he could<br />Outsmart the hebrew<br />On his fixed game of<br />&quot;Wage-cuck-you&quot;<br /><br /><br />Amerimutt<br /><br />Your name unknown<br />Your identity foretold<br />As a mix of all the mystery blood<br /><br />Down the drain<br />Heritage and race<br />Follow blind the way of Hussein<br /><br />A stinky nose<br />The size of a glock<br />Schlomo wont let his mutt alone<br /><br />&quot;Bomb the Krauts!&quot;<br />&quot;Nuke the nips!&quot;<br />The mindless golem obliges the yid<br /><br />Time ripped much<br />of the monster&#39;s strength<br />Chained in the jungles far from West<br /><br />A feast of fiends<br />Awaited on return<br />Negros raided white man&#39;s home  <br /><br />And as decades pass<br />He cant recall<br />Those days where war no longer was<br /><br />For always he<br />Fought tooth and nail<br />Never for a righteous aim<br /><br />Dont worry mutt<br />Your time has come<br />To be the whore of Babylon<br /><br />But as you sink into eternal rest<br />A final cry forms in your lips<br />&quot;Whiter than you, Mohammed&quot;<br />The mutt now has ceased to be<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10348'>&gt;&gt;10348</a><br />I don&#39;t know the technical details of the i2p design, but I read in an old article by one of the i2pd devs that an abundance of peers might actually make the network slower if anything.<br />And as for torrents: for torrenting, even 20 peers is plenty. I&#39;ve downloaded torrents with 30+ peers in i2p, and the speed was still at the maximum I ever got there - 100kb/s. <br />And frankly I doubt it&#39;s even possible to make a fast torrent client that provides anonymity. Plausible deniability is what we should aim for. Maybe it&#39;s possible to make a torrent client which would also act sort of like freenet nodes do, over the torrent wire protocol. The problem however is that I cannot see it gaining even its first users, just like I couldn&#39;t see freenet gaining any users were it made today and not 20 years ago, because interacting with any illegal content on the clearnet today is much more dangerous than it was back then.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post10214'>&gt;&gt;10214</a><br />I doubt the popularity of i2p has much to do with the strictness of the copyright laws, normies actually like the act of paying for shit. People you find on i2p are  ideologically motivated to be there imho.<br /><br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='pinktext'>&lt;Do you have instagram?</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;What about facebook</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;Snapchat?</span><br />The moment they ask you all of this together, you should walk away. normalniggers don&#39;t have interesting topics to speak of, and will try to hook you up with the latest Kardashian gossip, void of any meaning.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10403'>&gt;&gt;10403</a><br />false. you dont know what you&#39;re talking about.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17557'>&gt;&gt;17557</a><br />THIS! Where the fuck did everyone go? /tech/ deserved to die because of Jim&#39;s retarded 2-captcha system, Tor posters not allowed to post images, JS required to see post replies, and the (v2) onion service being unreliable. But I hoped that the userbase would move someplace better, like nano or endchan.<br /><br />We&#39;ll see if anyone returns once /tech/ is migrated to 8kun, but I doubt it.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18191'>&gt;&gt;18191</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;THIS! Where the fuck did everyone go?</span><br />Everyone went back to 4chan. The amount of /tech/ users who did not use 4chan was very small compared to tho amount of posters. The amount of altchan technical users barely went up when 8chan went down.


Board: a
Name: Nanonymous
File: 87b00f5c9abc56a6f2eda2f2719b454fd854dda041037a6d17317d94b5f277bb.jpg
Comment:
  Too much lewd, this isn&#39;t what OP would have wanted. Say what you will about 4cuck, but no other imageboard has created anything close to the anime-coziness /c/ or /w/. Guess there&#39;s just not enough interest. 


Board: a
Name: Nanonymous
File: 6ced3ca91c2cdf7a2babbaa8a81297ef2ab9e7c789797f3e2b2b9341f1861a6c.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post2056'>&gt;&gt;2056</a><br />Yeah, I thought the title made it obvious but my intent was 4cuck/c/ style of posting which means SFW.<br />If you want to post lewds use <a class='reference' href='/a/2058.html'>&gt;&gt;&gt;/a/2058</a> ?


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Being noticed by senpai
File: c51a964c11250260ace74c2e6e8de477e5cc2e1c4bf6fda489858cd28a44282d.png
Comment:
  Nanochan got added to digdeeper&#39;s Forums Classification Project as an alternative to 8chan!<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/forums.html'>https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/forums.html</a><br />Digdeeper confirmed nanon? If you are reading this keep up the good work, love your blog fren.<br /><br />Thread about nanochan mentions outside of the nanoverse i guess.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: ae732487224b91e7168684fa3c951e7d08dfd61b44aaaef55a0f550152619d58.png
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;wat do</span><br />Make new prepaid card, put enough money for her to buy icecream, insert card number, expiry date and security code.<br />Enjoy the icecream Tsukasa-chan.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: e3233e201206dbfa5786589650b62fa1d538cd16a1651c7cb3e625c4865d2637.jpg
Comment:
  Thanks for all the advices.<br />I think my problem may be both physical and psychological.<br />I spend most of my time sitting down on a chair staring at a computer so I rarely get much light, fresh air, physical exercise, I am not obese but also not in my best shape ever. For now I don&#39;t want to go to a doctor and I am hesitant of falling for every /fit/ meme tbh, problem is that there is nothing to do outside where I live.<br />I decided I&#39;m spending next weekend innawoods away from where I live, we&#39;ll see how it goes.<br />I also think <a class='reference' href='#post18178'>&gt;&gt;18178</a> is right in a sense, my routine is unhealthy and too static, I could go live in another country for a month or something like that next year, although I am not in the position to leave everything behind.<br />Today I cleaned up my whole house since more than two months, I feel physically tired but less mentally tired than before.<br />Being alone doesn&#39;t help for sure.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18193'>&gt;&gt;18193</a><br />That pic, do you know which anime it&#39;s from?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10390'>&gt;&gt;10390</a><br />archive.is bullshit kept giving me cuckflare &quot;One More Step&quot; ban page. every time i view 4 pages it happened. got like 30 exit nodes banned last night.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10406'>&gt;&gt;10406</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;muh websht is secure mommy^Wgoogle said so</span><br />do you want a special crown? do you also think PDF viewers dont have vulns?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post9468'>&gt;&gt;9468</a><br />no no, you don&#39;t need<br />HostBasedAcceptedKeyTypes -*nistp*


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10371'>&gt;&gt;10371</a><br />izz u are serious?<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;who will own it?</span><br />noone, of course<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;who will moderate it?</span><br />the web of trust<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;who will delete spam?</span><br />the web of trust<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;who will decide what is the policy for removal?</span><br />no real imageboard or forum ever needed this. people who say &quot;muh quality&quot; are literal autists who need to have everything in their stupid order<br />but if this is a &quot;Tor chan&quot;, it will probably just be some trash like NNTP. the final solution is on the likes of Freenet or IPFS


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18178'>&gt;&gt;18178</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Just get out of your situation</span><br />That&#39;s the mid to long term solution, but for now I have to put up with it.<br /><a class='reference' href='#post18193'>&gt;&gt;18193</a><br />Kuzu no Honkai.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 84925930c082c0a0fc61c9a353d725ea67161e25352d7182503b31844f7a61f7.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18191'>&gt;&gt;18191</a><br />8gag is just turbowebshit now. &quot;hurr durr we support free speech&quot;, and then 10 disclaimers every time you post, a tiny checkbox, and every post has a disclaimer under it. it&#39;s literally the most amerifucked website in existence right now. and tor users cant post as usual. you fill the &quot;daily&quot; captcha and try to post and still cant post, it sends you to the captcha again


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18193'>&gt;&gt;18193</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I also think <a class='reference' href='#post18178'>&gt;&gt;18178</a> is right in a sense, my routine is unhealthy and too static, I could go live in another country for a month or something like that next year, although I am not in the position to leave everything behind.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;next year</span><br />lmaooo wtf are you doing nigger like just go outside<br />sitting down 24/7 and not getting vitamin d = bad


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10088'>&gt;&gt;10088</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;And noone wants to torrent anything at 100kb/s at best</span><br />100kb/s would be more than enough for something that actually worked (meanwhile, on cucknet, you have to go through 10 different heterogenous mediums, filling out captchas, copy/pasting passwords and all kinds of bullshit for each file, instead of selecting from a uniform list what you want and queing it), and is anonymous. i used i2p for a while but it&#39;s largely a waste of time because it&#39;s webshit and script kiddie monkey patched bittorrent clients. it is not the future


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10404'>&gt;&gt;10404</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;And frankly I doubt it&#39;s even possible to make a fast torrent client that provides anonymity. Plausible deniability is what we should aim for.</span><br />why in the fuck? public torrents have fuck tons of speed, by design. and being on onion routing doesnt change this property unless the network itself is slow. the only difference is in public people are reluctant to seed because muh v&amp;


Board: a
Name: Nanonymous
File: a479ed6deab8594fcc5ebe3688307c4e1fab2539bbe46011b014cb7cee95d6f1.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post2082'>&gt;&gt;2082</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;7.95 MiB</span><br />Daaamn that is a thick girl.


Board: l
Name: arse
Comment:
  <span class='redtext'>@fixerb</span><br /><span class='redtext'>@nemo</span><br />don&#39;t really have another way to contact you. bread has been refusing to forward my message to you, saying he doesn&#39;t want to &quot;disturb&quot; you for a few days now, with no signs of stopping.<br />please get on this irc <a class='reference' href='#post18186'>&gt;&gt;18186</a><br />would it kill you to say bye?


Board: a
Name: Nanonymous
File: 0f2ee3394b14cd436de32a4ffc303437ee9613360358964c468f406d8c835ff0.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post2083'>&gt;&gt;2083</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Daaamn that is a thick girl.</span><br />Well, she has ninja techniques to make herself gigantic ya know.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18198'>&gt;&gt;18198</a> I am unsure if nemo saw these messages. I will let him know. 


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: e76c2435671a82cfea5f4dd6d1cfee709ea632872013210e4ea0afd48255432a.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4744'>&gt;&gt;4744</a><br />I didn&#39;t think it was still scheduled to happen. The delay to 2020 is awkward but I guess it makes remembering its birthday easier.<br /><br />Hey Asukafag: <span class='spoiler'>is this umaru a hapa or not?</span><br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18198'>&gt;&gt;18198</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18199'>&gt;&gt;18199</a><br />fuck off, namefags


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4746'>&gt;&gt;4746</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The delay to 2020 is awkward</span><br />It makes perfect sense considering asukafag autism.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;is this umaru a hapa or not?</span><br />IMO she is a white quapa.<br /><br /><span class='redtext'>QUAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO HAPAS</span>


Board: l
Name: xxxISISfanboiucci420$xxx
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;He unironically posts on a defunct imageboard</span><br /><br />What do you call a nanon using the wrong site? Names!


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10277'>&gt;&gt;10277</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;1080p streaming in 2006</span><br />No.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10415'>&gt;&gt;10415</a><br />Screw this clownworld garbage though. VGA was good enuf.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10411'>&gt;&gt;10411</a><br />P2P stuff requires more resources than federated solutions like NNTP (which itself ran fine on 1980&#39;s hardware).  This matters a lot if you care about avoiding hardware botnet.<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: it never ends
File: fa792ee8a0844d7ae71721596e8fdb5ac9e0a0fc6caed1c7cc711159c8b9bb8b.jpg
Comment:
  we are back up, \ T H E  E N D \ ever again<br />old address temporarily up <a rel='noreferrer' href='http://theendgrqykcahkhgd2ny36tefdaqyk34r5bdskwmh3olt6iemxrshid.onion'>http://theendgrqykcahkhgd2ny36tefdaqyk34r5bdskwmh3olt6iemxrshid.onion</a><br />new address: <a rel='noreferrer' href='http://theendgtso35ir6ngdtyhgtjhhbbprmkzl74gt5nyeu3ocr34sfa67yd.onion'>http://theendgtso35ir6ngdtyhgtjhhbbprmkzl74gt5nyeu3ocr34sfa67yd.onion</a>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17560'>&gt;&gt;17560</a><br /><br />so start your own chan and do the same thing.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18060'>&gt;&gt;18060</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Hey, I&#39;ll answer you guys later, I have some normiefag shit to do.</span><br />No problem man.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Watch the videos I&#39;ve linked on <a class='reference' href='#post17849'>&gt;&gt;17849</a></span><br />One point: these videos go for national US average. The world situation with power distribution is a bit worse.<br />Another point: for the 3rd video, using natural gas as a source is cheating, so the 60% for fossil fuel efficiency is fairly optimistic - the ~40 percent of the WORLD (not 40% of fossil fuel energy spent in power plants) electric energy comes from COAL, which is much worse than natural gas emission-wise too.<br />Another point: I have no idea how the average emission estimate for burning fossil fuels at power plants got so low but as I see it, it&#39;s marginally better anyway, and that is the next point<br />The point: the transportation takes about a quarter of the world energy consumption, and for cars it&#39;s even lower than that, so replacing cars with EVs DOES NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM. Shifting the power source from fossil fuels to e.g. nuclear DOES SOLVE so much more problems with this clown world those shitty cars don&#39;t even compare.<br />Sidepoint: I&#39;m not familiar with those MPG efficiency estimates but those numbers really contradict the efficiency assumptions behind my calculations, and I&#39;d rather have amendments to my sources or the explicit statement of what I&#39;ve missed rather than trust some random numbers from I don&#39;t know where and by what methodology<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;b-but we were talking about cars</span><br />We were. Then we were talking about energy efficiency and emissions. EVs are only marginally better efficiency-wise on the world scale, and considering the fact that cars are a small fraction of the world power consumption, their advantage is even less significant. Disadvantages of EVs - it is a shitty car. It is bad. If you care about environment, don&#39;t purchase any car, period. The problem with them is evident because big cities suffocate from that shit. With EVs some other place is going to suffocate instead of a city. I don&#39;t like this solution but my point is very obviously a car hater&#39;s point. Consider it.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;so, are EVs better</span><br />The ultimate point I want to make is that unless they are about ten times more efficient, they are a waste of time, considering their disadvantages. So, to be more precise and clear, say 25% for ICE means 75% inefficiency. 75% / 10 = 7.5%. When EVs are 100% - 7.5% = 92.5% efficient from the plant to the mile travelled, call me, I&#39;ll buy it. It&#39;s not impossible.<br />Things that would benefit humanity more:<br />a) better battery<br />b) better energy sources


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10413'>&gt;&gt;10413</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;meanwhile, on cucknet, you have to go through 10 different heterogenous mediums, filling out captchas, copy/pasting passwords and all kinds of bullshit for each file, instead of selecting from a uniform list what you want and queing it</span><br />What do you mean? You don&#39;t need captchas or passwords for piratebay &amp; the like you only need an adblocker. And even then you can just use searx.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post10414'>&gt;&gt;10414</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;d being on onion routing doesnt change this property unless the network itself is slow.</span><br />Onion routing makes communications slow, yeah.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10361'>&gt;&gt;10361</a><br />I dunno if imagemagick supports it but some stupid dirty solution assuming your input is sane would be<br /><br />cat yourlinklist | (while read link; do curl -q $link | convert - linkpic.jpg)<br /><br />This is not the exact solution, obviously.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10419'>&gt;&gt;10419</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You don&#39;t need captchas or passwords for piratebay</span><br />which has no content, so you use 30 other websites, including non-torrent shit. if some p2p shit got popular (like torrent was before everyone got v&amp;), there wouldn&#39;t be sparsity of content, and you could queue whatever you want by simply searching it and pressing the download button<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Onion routing makes communications slow, yeah.</span><br />you literally have unlimited bandwidth (until the whole network dies - limited to the paths you&#39;re willing to take) when onion routing.


Board: l
Name: 1%er
File: b1db94000a5d3aa2b2faa6aa22794c75902909d75829fe2d683f483c2f5a8480.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18096'>&gt;&gt;18096</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;In broad terms, what are you planning to do with the money you have?</span><br />I think I already did my part in expanding our business and growing our capital, so I don&#39;t plan to do incredible things with it. The problem of wealth is that gaining it is just one part of the struggle, the real deal is maintaining it, most families that finds themselves with lot of money loses it in 2 to 3 generations, so my priority is to make sure that is not going to happen. For now I am focusing on raising my kids right and making sure they don&#39;t turn into liberal faggots.<br />Sometime I donate to some projects that I find interesting or good or that were useful to me, most are open source projects or local associations. Although I regret donating to the Linux Foundation and Mozilla Foundation seeing how those turned out, lately I am more careful with donations. If you have projects that you think deserve money link them, I&#39;ll check them out.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;This is nor really a question about you but if you don&#39;t already own a business, is it better to specialize in a field to earn seed capital or go to study business at uni and somehow make a company?</span><br />Since boomers times things changed a lot, nowadays if you want to make a company you either need to have some revolutionary idea or you need to fill a not yet saturated niche, to answer your question for sure I suggest becoming an expert into the field you intend to cover with your company, this does not necessarily means specializing is always a good thing though, sometime it is more useful to have a comprehensive understanding of a broader field of knowledge than being hyper specialized in a sub-field, unless you plan on selling your hyper specialized company to a bigger corporation of course. Whatever you choose you should still study the basics of business, from project planning to basic accounting to your local business laws, if you plan on getting seed/venture capital you should also work on your speech and presentation skills.<br />Finally since you are starting from scratch you might want to consider founding the company in a country that has favorable policies towards startups/businesses and low taxes.<br />Youtube channel/blog with some useful information <a rel='noreferrer' href='https://www.youtube.com/user/nomadcapitalist/videos'>https://www.youtube.com/user/nomadcapitalist/videos</a><br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18102'>&gt;&gt;18102</a><br />I am not a tranny obviously, tbqh I consider them all mentally ill, maybe they cope with their mental problems with anime, I don&#39;t know, I don&#39;t care.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18107'>&gt;&gt;18107</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;not creating genetically modified catgirls</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;not building a cluster of heavily armed satellited to control orbit looking down on mere humans</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;being dictator of a mere country instead of a planetary empire</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;relying on US dollars instead of making your own currency with your face on each coin and banknote</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;not even making a cult of personality out of your person</span><br />Weak.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18114'>&gt;&gt;18114</a><br />They are randomly picked from a smug anime girls folder I have.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18182'>&gt;&gt;18182</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;independent communication channel</span><br />Yeah, as the name implies it is an independent phone/internet line connected directly to my bunker in case attackers try isolating me from the outside.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18187'>&gt;&gt;18187</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Are you jewish?</span><br />No I am not, there is no jewish blood in my family. My family immigrated from Great Britain in the 18th century.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18189'>&gt;&gt;18189</a><br />Spotted the nigger.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18191'>&gt;&gt;18191</a><br />Agreed on all the criticisms.<br /><br />The sad fact is that 95% of 8ch didn&#39;t use Tor, and did not realize it&#39;s necessary. Even on boards you would expect to be more &quot;woke&quot;, like /pol/ and /tech/, Tor usage was so unpopular that anti-Tor shills would often go unchallenged because no torpedo was around to refute them. In fact, most of the Tor users were actually pedos and other weebs.<br /><br />Not to say Tor is perfect, but it sure is better than broadcasting your IP to everyone.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18202'>&gt;&gt;18202</a><br />Nothing is loading for me on these.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Electric cars are an interesting concept, but most electric cars on the market are spyware botnet shit that tracks your every move. For example Tesla from a mechanical/electrical perspective is a pretty neat car, but there&#39;s constant data collection and remote shutdown, no thanks.<br /><br />Also full electric seems a bit dumb. If power goes out you&#39;re completely stuck now. I guess the whole point of switching to electric cars is that the grid runs on solar, at which point everyone might as well have their own panels at home. But nevertheless fuel is much easier to stockpile as backup than power. Hybrids are much better, or at least electric cars should agree on some standard so that you can buy something like a gas generator that fits into a special compartment in the trunk.<br /><br />It&#39;s also fucking bullshit that government gives tax credits for them. Bribe people to early adopt a meme technology, in effect transferring money from taxpayers to car manufacturers. Bunch of fucking bullshit.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18209'>&gt;&gt;18209</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; It&#39;s also fucking bullshit that government gives tax credits for them. Bribe people to early adopt a meme technology, in effect transferring money from taxpayers to car manufacturers. Bunch of fucking bullshit.</span><br />It&#39;s probably better if everybody who travels &lt;100 miles per day (or so) and wants to do it by car just buys a special car for that exact purpose.<br />If they want an actual car that goes places they could buy another vehicle, preferrably diesel or something else and use it only when they want to travel far.<br />TBH I think it&#39;s how it should be: cars ONLY for going far away and the daily commute performed via public transportation, but the car faggotry is too strong.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Women are anti-democratic
File: a52a6f952754f3526266aba40dc6655737afcdf768d2ac7fbd039b054f06690e.png
Comment:
  When women were given the vote, did anyone actually feel that they had some extraordinary talent for statesmanship that was going to waste? Was it ever part of the argument that with women participating in democracy, the quality of decisions will improve? It seems to me that the main reasons were<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;it&#39;s fair</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;it&#39;s moral</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;let them have their turn</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;if we just give them what they want surely they&#39;ll stop complaining (lol)</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;if our party gives them the vote, we&#39;ll buy their loyalty for years to come</span><br /><br />Even today nobody seriously claims that women are somehow superior to men in government. Occasionally turbo-thot will try to bullshit about how women are less violent and more friendly or some shit, but I think even the modern liberals cognitive dissonance is enough to swallow bullshit of such epic proportions. It doesn&#39;t help that now we have many examples of women in leadership roles, and everybody knows how it turns out.<br /><br />Women by nature love to nag and whine. They cannot get what they want by force or by authority, so their only option is to nag and whine. A woman will habitually nag authority figures over every little thing she can think of. The merits of her need are irrelevant. Her real goal is to reinforce a pattern of of her nagging, and you giving in, so that she can feel secure that if she ever needs something in the future, she can always nag you for it. If she runs out of things to ask, she will start asking for things someone else needs, or even things that nobody needs, just so long as it creates something to nag over and thereby reinforce the pattern.<br /><br />Now this pattern has overtaken our government. Decisions are not made so as to find the most effective solution that would enable the taste to govern better. Instead the government does whatever people nag and whine about. It&#39;s so common that even some weak men are now beginning to adopt the feminine whining behavior.<br /><br />Some like to say that it&#39;s not the women&#39;s fault, they&#39;re only subverted by jews. It&#39;s true, jews understand the whining behavior well, and use it to maximum effect. But without women, the jews would find it a lot harder to manipulate the masses. Yet without jews, the women would still nag and whine. No doubt the concern is that white men will disdain women and not have children with them. This is ridiculous. Since when do you need to cuck out to a woman to have kids with her? What&#39;s next, 5 year olds making important family decisions because muh white chilrun must be cherished? You can cherish them without completely undermining your decision making.<br /><br />The whole point of a democratic government is that collective wisdom is harnessed to make the best decisions for the nation. This must be the basis of every decision made in government: Is this the most effective solution? Will this make our country better? Decisions shouldn&#39;t be made just to grease every squeaking wheel, to placate every nag, to cave in to every whine. To do so would be exactly counter to the duty of the government to the governed, it would literally be undemocratic. Many democratic western countries started out with this principle. And the more they abandoned it, the more things went to shit.<br /><br />Women should never be allowed in democratic government, because all they know is to whine and nag incessantly. Including them in government is literally one of the most antidemocratic things you could do.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  thats sure alotta sexism you just pulled out of your ass kid<br /><br />remember schmuck, a sapient human being doesnt behave like a monki and if you think male monkis are better than female monkis for whatever, you have to have proofs ready my friend. also if you think females go hi places by being monkis, you are severely deluded<br /><br />anyway that seems like a nice thread to drop a brownpill into<br />you seem to be under the impression that you live in a democratic society. you actually dont, and its beautiful. its beautiful because your an undereducated indoctrinated mentally handicapped asshole anyway, so you really shouldnt decide anything.<br />if we dont live in the democracy, then what is this system called. let&#39;s somewhat unconventionally call it the liberal totalitarism. its liberal because most of the stuff classic liberals fought for are there and/or are being developed. its totalitarian because NO OTHER WAY IS ACCEPTED, however scary it may sound or be, and you get fucked pretty hard by not being some sort of liberal, not only as a politician, but also as an individual.<br />its all there is to it. something really big or really stupid has to happen for the history to change its course.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  You are assuming there is a best and most effective solution to any problem a government might encounter. In reality, most of he times we have a controversial issue, its either a question of moral values or preference. No political ideology is entirely right or wrong (well, some are more than others, but thats not the point), its just what some people like more than some other ones.<br /><br />The issue of free speech is a one that illustrates this well: i personally think that its important that we have an absolute freedom in this matter, while some other people might think that my freedom to be nasty to people is not really worth it and should be done something about. Both opinions are exactly the same as valid.<br />Multiculturalism is another such example: many people dont feel the same nationalistic pride as you probably do and they dont see the merit in a homogeneous society; they would very much rather live in a diverse one instead (for one reason or the other). Again, none of these is necessary the correct way to run a country.<br />I could go on: Abortion, trans kids, racism, all of these are questions of morals, while things like weed prohibition or gun rights are a matter of preference. Both have upsides and downsides, its about deciding whether they are worth it.<br /><br />Giving women the right to vote means that they get to participate in the process of choosing the direction for the country. And yeah its fair.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10418'>&gt;&gt;10418</a><br />At least pretend to make an effort, fagget.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  I don&#39;t even bother with torrent anymore.  Most of the movies I downloaded in the past decade were from temporary FTP sites that were posted on chans or IRC.  I suppose you could route this through Tor but none of the ones I used bothered to.  This method was also one way warez were spreaded in the 90&#39;s, except the couriers &quot;borrowed&quot; someone else&#39;s server on a T1 or better, instead of using their own (too expensive or too slow).


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: c445fb3c91bd614b0dbb70fb120a1984e1ec49a2843711bc86aa5495a9d7f679.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18208'>&gt;&gt;18208</a><br />If that&#39;s true, I underestimated the number of &#39;tards who used that website. Even if Tor doesn&#39;t stop glowies from finding out who you are, it would at least obfuscate your identity from data-mining businesses, which are actually more of a real threat. The glowies will only go after you if you&#39;re involved with high-priority crime like cp, drugs, murder, weapons, etc.<br /><br />It&#39;s too dangerous to have an opinion on the clearnet at the moment, anything you say can and will be used against you, even if what you say is not illegal. There is also the risk that something you say will be taken out of context and this makes interaction on there a liability. Being on certain websites, like 8ch, is a liability onto itself due to the shenanigans that get tied to it. While those who argue that the same riffraff occurs on major corporate websites are correct, they ignore the fact that those corporate websites are the <i>socially acceptable</i> corporate owned places to be one the Internet.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10421'>&gt;&gt;10421</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;which has no content, </span><br />Uh, what content are you talking about? Give an example of what you couldn&#39;t find on piratebay or searx <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;you literally have unlimited bandwidth (until the whole network dies - limited to the paths you&#39;re willing to take) when onion routing.</span><br />Why is tor slow then?<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <span class='spoiler'>Your post text was too short. On this board, threads require at least 70 characters.</span>


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: e8639cc7221f20e5cdf9152ae5650ab4896b87a611bd617b29e5fa75f28b86b4.jpg
Comment:
  Women aren&#39;t pro or anti democratic. They are just pro-socialization for themselves and their potential families whether they acknowledge this or not. This just happens to manifest politically because the family structure is skewed today, this lets full franchise democracy (where every retard has a vote) take it&#39;s course by mainly browns, minority women, and pussyhats (overly socialized liberals). Some women, especially lower quality women, just choose the state currently because its more expedient and easier for them than raising a family, if the state can&#39;t provide a better deal then this will change over time.<br /><br />Also, minority women are just &quot;double plus&quot; stupid so they in a sense need the state. Black women reject black men for the &quot;white men&quot; that run (support/pay for) the government. <br /><br />The problem with this is that the most productive individuals are not engaged in the political process of democracy because they are too busy supporting their families, pursuing a career, and actually contributing something. The parasites are the ones soaking up the attention, they take up government jobs, take up socially motivated careers <span class='kiketext'>(((journalists, entertainment/media, social workers, etc)))</span>, writing and complaining (cancel culture), and spending all their abundant free-time on social media which create a monopoly, artificial feedback loop for which to amplify their voice; all the while destroying society by advocating non-reciprocal policies, bad rapping white people, the founders, and people who actually support the country. This doesn&#39;t make it any better that minorities are flooding the country and that they disagree with constitution principles. <br /><br />This is why heavily constrained republic are more successful than <span class='kiketext'>(((democracies)))</span>. I believe Propertarianism and subsequent separation is the best way to go. It will be a very popular constitution once it finishes and picks up steam. The concept is pretty solid and can be retooled if lacking a certain niche. A normie could understand the basic rule of reciprocity (i.e. White man&#39;s golden rule).<br /><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://johnmarksays.com/propertarianism/'>https://johnmarksays.com/propertarianism/</a>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18206'>&gt;&gt;18206</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I regret donating to the Linux Foundation and Mozilla Foundation</span><br />lol you&#39;re better off gambling or running your own organization<br /><br />I&#39;d recommend investing and taking some ownership in a new promising idea, so you would have a say of the direction. There are always some smart folks out there that just need a little liquidity to take off.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;cope with their mental problems with anime</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;smug anime girls folder I have</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I watch anime since ~25 years</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;watched every genre</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;focusing on raising my kids right</span><br />I knew you were a weeb larper. If not mentioning the Loonux donations before getting to your theory of venture capital, it would be the anime faggotry suggests you&#39;re still childless and middleclass. Not just the fact you&#39;re still surfing Tor.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18212'>&gt;&gt;18212</a><br />I agree with you, Tor is not a guarantee of anything if the spooks are after you. But it hugely reduces the threat surface from admins that suddenly cuck, rogue employees, hackers and the like getting access to web logs. As you say, vigilantes like antifa will easily assume guilt by association even if you haven&#39;t done any badgoy things on the site. And besides, the more people use Tor, the more pressure there is on sites to support Tor.<br /><br />I don&#39;t blame the 8ch userbase as much though. There were a lot of anons whose first ib was 8ch. You can&#39;t expect newfags to know everything from day one. What really hurt matters was the attitude of the regulars and the behavior of the administration. 8ch was a priority target for some people, at least as far back as the lizard squad ddoses. So we got a lot of shills saying Tor is bad and dumb. The oldfags never fought back hard enough. I think the newfags saw this, and also saw the site treating Tor users like second class citizens, and concluded &quot;if Tor was worthwhile people would care more&quot; and fell for the shilling.<br /><br />I see it often with many sites and projects that come out of &quot;our&quot; community. After all the talk about tinfoil-tier privacy precautions, people go right on with botnet decisions like JS, cuckflare, banning Tor, recaptcha. Tor should not be an afterthought for any site that cares about its users. The site should be designed for Tor/uMatrix first, and the clearnet/JS site should be a compromise purely to be accessible to people who haven&#39;t figured out yet how to use Tor. The site should then, through features and culture, encourage these noobs to learn about Tor and other private web technologies. Instead we see the opposite in many places.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: 6c83a91afd7d7a24a08585ac80efff22e1b1e382dfd3fc97bfc84a2f8b4be2d9.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4747'>&gt;&gt;4747</a><br />I was hoping asukafag would answer my question with the usual &quot;I don&#39;t know because make up&quot; then I&#39;d be smug like<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;he doesn&#39;t know</span><br />Can&#39;t even have simple pleasure anymore, hue.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;QUAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO HAPAS</span><br />Asukafag would genocide their genetically impure bums sooner than you can say &quot;ayo hol up&quot;.<br />


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  democracy is cucked by itself anyway women or not women<br /><a class='reference' href='#post8033'>&gt;&gt;8033</a><br />starwhore spotted


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Just testing the newly implemented ban system on myself.<br /><br /><span class='redtext'>(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)</span><br />


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8033'>&gt;&gt;8033</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;muh sexism</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;muh <span class='kiketext'>(((education)))</span></span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;using jew words</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;scatophilia</span><br />What is this, kike shill bingo?<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8034'>&gt;&gt;8034</a><br />The point is not that you find the most pefect solution, but that your goal should be to find as good solution as possible. Ignoring any merits or flaws the solution might have, and deciding purely on the basis of pandering to every whiner, not only leads to dysfunctional governance, but also ruins the governed by teaching them to be useless whiners. Done to children by parents, it results in spoiled brats. Done to women, it results misandry. Done to dogs, it results in bad dogs. Done to voters, it creates the clown world we now live in.<br /><br />Your examples further illustrate the point.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;free speech</span><br />Clearly it is preferable that immature people grow up and get over it. Historically, communities of all sizes that have real free speech have generated ideas of much better quality, while hugboxes stagnate into useless criclejerks. The only reason to not have free speech -in this context, we are obviously not speaking of things like yelling fire in a crowded theater or revealing state secrets to enemies- is because some faggot got their feelings hurt and simply closing the tab and going for a walk was somehow not enough. No, they must prevent those mean people from saying bad things or thinking bad thoughts anywhere at all! So the two sides are not equivalent at all. One is about doing the right thing, the other is *not* doing the right thing because some immature faggot is whining and you&#39;re too spineless to deal with it.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;multiculturalism</span><br />First, again in this context there is no multiculturalism. There is destroying a sophisticated culture by bringing in shit tier niggers who don&#39;t have culture. It&#39;s not like the foremost problem du jour is Swedes coming to France, and eating surströmming in the baguette garden. Moreover, even staunch liberals report low trust in diverse societies (and the rich ones still live in 98% white gated communities while telling you how great it is to have section 8 next door). Historically, multiculturalism has preceded the death of many great empires as well, as it is doing so now.<br /><br />Again the decision is obvious: If a nation has a culture conducive to shit working and things going well, this culture should be preserved and not undermined. This has nothing to do with nationalism or xenophobia, it follows from the simple fact that if X is working really well for you, suddenly deciding to do the opposite of X is probably a bad idea. Once again, the main reason to encourage multiculturalism is pandering - cucking out to shitlibs because you lack the spine to deny their whining.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8035'>&gt;&gt;8035</a><br />I obviously disagree with you on women not being anti-democratic, since I believe they are inherently harmful to the democratic process. But otherwise I agree that decision making should be constrained. The concept that everybody gets to vote for whether they want jew with red tie or jew with blue tie to jew them for the next 4 years is retarded. We can easily transcend even the propaganda we are subjected to by simply following the idea to its logical conclusion: Why not extend the franchise to convicts, foreigners, children, downies, pets, vegetables... How should you decide who gets to make an important decision? Should it be people that are qualified to do it and generally have some possibility of rationally taking into account the common good of the country? Or should you just try to cave in to as many people as possible who whine that they should get to decide too? And even include people who themselves are too dumb to care, but somebody else is whining on their account? Phrased this way, there is no dichotomy. It is clear that one is right and one is wrong.<br /><br />Property is a fair place to draw the line. But historically that system devolved into the current one, so it is flawed at least in that respect. Many retards today own property and would go on voting as before. Fundamentally, the problem is that people should not be involved in government on the basis of how much they want to. I&#39;m not speaking here of somehow reading their minds and discovering who is the selflessest saint or something, but a much simpler thing: When evaluating someone whether for voting or office, it should be asked: Do they actually have something to contribute? Is there actually a good reason to include this person in the process, other than &quot;they&#39;ve been whining about how they should be included since God knows how long and everyone&#39;s sick of hearing it&quot;? Because the worst thing you can do to a whiner is give them what they want.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;genetically impure</span><br />Implying hapas aren&#39;t more impure than aryan quapas.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: 7d670c7425b0236b9e891fce42f9501ab5721f0e578f74e284b9d4c16611384d.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4751'>&gt;&gt;4751</a><br />50%-50% is, mathematically speaking, the purest form <span class='spoiler'>hue</span>.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  The purest form is 100% a race, 50%-50% is the most impure. Quapas being ~75% a race are more pure than hapas and at the same time inherit many strong points of asians or viceversa.<br />How can hapas even compete?<br /><br /><span class='redtext'>QUAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO HAPAS</span>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Да, да есть тут такие. А сосач стал гавном с момента прихода макаки если не раньше<br />(да не норм фон)


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: QUAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO HAPAS
File: 2bedd834e34aa301e9d829fe1a1ca71426fbfde746e5487c9c66f1038833ed48.png
Comment:
  The purest racial quality is being 100% of a particular race, hapas being 50% white and 50% asian makes them the most impure racial combination you could have, this causes them to not belong to any place and to not belong to any culture which brings them towards mental illness.<br />Quapas instead being ~75% of a race are more pure than hapas, tending toward a particular race and culture, they belong to and are recognized by the society they live in and grow up as sane and beautiful individuals.<br />How could hapas even think to compete with quapas?<br />The only right thing an hapa man can do is impregnating an aryan woman or a japanese woman and raising superior quapas.<br />The only right thing an hapa woman can do is getting impregnated by an aryan man or a japanese man and giving birth to superior quapas.<br /><b>Marrying a white man was the most based thing Hapase ever did.</b><br /><b>Asuka Soryu Langley is a prime example of a superior german-american-japanese quapa.</b><br /><br /><span class='redtext'>QUAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO HAPAS</span>


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8037'>&gt;&gt;8037</a><br />look boy<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;sexism</span><br />there is nothing wrong with gender roles per se or whatever you think about when the bullshit comes out of your mouth. what i mean to say is the less monki you behave, the less biological differences between men and women matter.<br />one thing to say about current state of affairs is that we are at legit gender war. more and more men and women just legit hate and misunderstand each other, and it represents itself in somewhat uneven laws towards men, probably because the state wants to give women some guarantees so they dont abort their kids.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;education</span><br />look asshead, one word that comes to mind when seeing such a braindead op is braindead. another word is ignorant. its simple.<br />you put 2 simple claims together: &quot;wimmin whine&quot; and &quot;democracy listens to whiners&quot;. nothing particularly brilliant or &quot;self-educated&quot; here.<br />and thats funny because all people whine, bitch, moan, scream, yell and giving women the pedestal here is like what the fuck? thats also funny because you also whine here, but democracy doesnt listen to you. maybe you dont &quot;whine&quot; irl but that just shows how stupid the stoic position of clenching your teeth and not talking about issues is. though it also may be because nobody takes you seriously.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;using jew words</span><br />not sure what your about but i thought that liberal totalitarism speaks straight into your agenda of describing current state of affairs lol. im pretty sure the society we live in isnt just. though i also think whatever patriarchal society you have in mind isnt just either. i also think democracy wouldnt be just because i dont want retards like you to tell me what to do and because the idea of 51% of people telling other 49% what to do is retarded.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8037'>&gt;&gt;8037</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Or should you just try to cave in to as many people as possible who whine that they should get to decide too?</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Property is a fair place to draw the line.</span><br />what you are talking about here is the out-of-the-book premise for the revolt of the poor lol<br />tip: they do happen<br />i suppose i speak from egalitarian bias and elitarian societies who shit on everybody can exist for a pretty long time. but just as well elitarian society doesnt provide you with means to elevate yourself from peasants to somebody who matters. maybe its the fact that the current society shifts to elitarian and your not included is bothering you. its hard to tell why you talk about it otherwise.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;that people should not be involved in government on the basis of how much they want to</span><br />thats a very interesting question.<br />i think people do involve themselves into politics because they want something, simple as that. what your saying is like asking somebody to swim without giving him water.<br />in other words, your wants are your motivation to live. if you dont want, you dont live. if you dont exercise your power, you will be oppressed.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Do they actually have something to contribute? Is there actually a good reason to include this person in the process, other than &quot;they&#39;ve been whining about how they should be included since God knows how long and everyone&#39;s sick of hearing it</span><br />you have at least 2 ways to go:<br />1) martian colony (lol)<br />2) anprim/ancap/ancom community<br />i didnt say those options are available to you but you probably could work towards them.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: 3ab06f6c1fc953aaf29c80eceaa2ca6e97df385ad69949a74ef1dfaf65d1e0ef.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8038'>&gt;&gt;8038</a><br />You opinion doesn&#39;t matter woman, go back in the kitchen starfag.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  also, another important point deserving its own post or maybe even a thread<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If a nation has a culture conducive to shit working and things going well, this culture should be preserved and not undermined. This has nothing to do with nationalism or xenophobia, it follows from the simple fact that if X is working really well for you, suddenly deciding to do the opposite of X is probably a bad idea</span><br />what you describe is called a political belief.<br />its normal to have them but consider a few points:<br />a) its subjective; people can have opinions though<br />b) its irrational; it comes from somewhere inside your personality and your nature<br />c) consecutively, people might not even understand what you mean, let alone agreeing with you<br /><br />overall, nothing is exactly wrong with that, but what you are trying to do essentially here (in a post) is to enforce your worldview onto a large group of people. considering all of the above, it could only work if you guessed correctly. i dont mean to stop you from trying but i dont want to guess and i dont want to follow a guesser.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8040'>&gt;&gt;8040</a><br />i dont like to cook<br />i am a decent cook though<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;starfag</span><br />starfagfags are worse than the starfag, prove me wrong


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8042'>&gt;&gt;8042</a><br />If only you would dedicate more attention to your fanclub and post lewd pics this wouldn&#39;t happen.<br />That is something woman should focus on doing: giving pleasure to man.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8043'>&gt;&gt;8043</a><br />could you stop courting the starfag for a second pls, pol has a conversation here<br />thanks


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8044'>&gt;&gt;8044</a><br />This is what happens when a man&#39;s craving for a woman&#39;s body parts overwhelms his desire to have a pol debate... but it&#39;s OK because this is a thread about women anyway, might as well court her<br /><span class='spoiler'>tbh tho these posts deserve to be deleted as derails</span><br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10426'>&gt;&gt;10426</a><br />huh i didnt think anyone still uses FTPs outside the scene after 2010. people used to hack FTPs and store warez on dem ^_^<br /><a class='reference' href='#post10427'>&gt;&gt;10427</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Uh, what content are you talking about? Give an example of what you couldn&#39;t find on piratebay</span><br />wut.<br />literally any music ever<br />literally any non-&quot;current&quot; movie ever, failing that they will only have some shit quality rip<br />literally any game ever. and when you can find an old game, it&#39;s repacked 500 times by retards


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8034'>&gt;&gt;8034</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;muh moral relativism</span><br />I think people like you should have their heads on spikes. Is that a valid opinion?


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8032'>&gt;&gt;8032</a><br />Democracy itself is a cancer. Every community must be organized locally, with just a few among the superior men deciding what everyone else must obey. Never let the inferior have rights.<br />As for women, they are tools. They must never have rights. Never have freedom. And never be allowed to express any opinion at all. Women are biological reproductive machines, and nothing else. A man who allows a woman to speak among men must be eliminated along with said woman.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;how women are less violent and more friendly</span><br />And that is a flaw. Violence is a superior trait. It allows for dominance, organization and stability by means of imposing one&#39;s will above the mindless masses while at the same time killing one&#39;s enemies and dissidents. In any situation whatsoever, a friendly approach is a failed approach.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If she runs out of things to ask, she will start asking for things someone else needs, or even things that nobody needs</span><br />Women are born useless, aside from being reproductive tools. Women are born dumb. and women never mature their brains. Women never truly are satisfied with anything, because for that to happen, every single woman wants that all other women ceases to exist and only her is alive AND every single men in the world desires only her, even those whom she doesn&#39;t want, and all of them never stop desiring her.<br />That is why women must never be allowed to do anything other than sex for reproduction. And those who don&#39;t obey must be killed. The others still alive will obey once enough are made an example of.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;It&#39;s so common that even some weak men are now beginning to adopt the feminine whining behavior.</span><br />And that is why the weak must always suffer and be killed. Again, the violent approach works best: never negotiate for both sides. Kill those on the other side, in order to keep society functional and advancing on areas that need advancement, while also never wasting time on useless things just to appease the weak. The weak must never have the right to exist in the first place.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;without women, the jews would find it a lot harder to manipulate the masses. Yet without jews, the women would still nag and whine</span><br />True. That is why giving in your natural superiority as a white man just because some law says so is idiocy. White Men are above any law, from any country. A white man&#39;s will IS the only true law in the whole world. Everything and everyone else is bound to obey that will/law, or be eliminated for being a dissident.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What&#39;s next, 5 year olds making important family decisions</span><br />Some countries already do that. and they are going bankrupt. Yes, there are idiots who will cuck to anything or anyone. Again, the same violent approach solves that: kill the weak. Kill the cucks. Do not negotiate or dialogue with them or with those who support them. Kill them.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You can cherish them without completely undermining your decision making</span><br />You don&#39;t have to cherish them, or anyone. You must always discipline them and program them to obey you without question, since their early years. Those sons who fail to do that must be eliminated, as it was done before, and then you make new sons to replace them. Your sons are tools for you to use to your favor. They are not people before they reach adulthood and become completely self-sufficient. And even then, they must always remain fully loyal to you as their father. Those who don&#39;t, again, must be eliminated and replaced by newer sons. As for daughters, them being women mean that they are tools for life. Never people. They are to be used and discarded, and them given to other loyal and successful white men for them to use and discard at their will, generating more white people with loyality and bloodline bonds to you.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Many democratic western countries started out with this principle. And the more they abandoned it, the more things went to shit</span><br />On the contrary. The more they became democratic, the more they started to listen to the whines of the weak. Democracy itself IS the main problem. A society cannot survive by being guided by a large collective wisdom. It can only prosper through tyranny, when only a few the best men among the best men rules, and everyone else obeys, regardless if they chose it or not, or like it or not. At the very least, the ones ruling can have advisors, but never have equals. The best must be free to rule, and everyone else must be forced to obey, so order and stability are kept intact.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Women should never be allowed</span><br />Anything. Period. Women aren&#39;t people. Never were, and never will be. Women are incapable of anything other than making children. And they must be treated accordingly. All desirable women are to be used for reproduction and discarded or eliminated as soon as they can&#39;t fulfill that function anymore. All undesirable women must be eliminated without any second thought.<br />Sexism against women must return to be the law, as it is the natural way. And those opposing it, as any dissidents, must be eliminated.<br />A functional society is one where only the superior are allowed freedom and everybody else either have very limited freedom or no freedom at all.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8033'>&gt;&gt;8033</a><br />Women aren&#39;t people. All women are born dumb and keep being dumb for their whole lives.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8034'>&gt;&gt;8034</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;And yeah its fair</span><br />It doesn&#39;t matter if it is fair. Women are inferior to men and must never be allowed any rights.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8038'>&gt;&gt;8038</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;whatever patriarchal society you have in mind isnt just either</span><br />So? Being just is detrimental to a society&#39;s stability. Only the best men in any society must be treated well. Everyone else must be put in their place, or be eliminated if they fail to do so.<br />Women&#39;s opinions and feeling don&#39;t matter in anything. Women are tools. Used when young, discarded when old. Women are nothing more than objects, and those who won&#39;t function properly must be destroyed and replaced by newer/younger ones.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8041'>&gt;&gt;8041</a><br />Nothing is subjective. Everything in the whole universe is objective. The moment that you invoke the jewish &quot;muh subjective&quot; propaganda, is the moment that your opinions on any matter are discarded.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8043'>&gt;&gt;8043</a><br />This.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8047'>&gt;&gt;8047</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Women aren&#39;t people</span><br />nice opinion dude<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Being just is detrimental to a society&#39;s stability</span><br />the society u described wouldnt be exactly stable either<br />the no-negotiation all-fight policy will lead to a lot of internal struggle, read bloodshed. while it may have some merits like the survival of the fittest to fighting, ultimately those societies have no development past the invention/advancment of weapons.<br />also the social structure of that would resemble an army, but with far less subordination and stability check rules. that means nobody in ranks would actually feel safe, because a lot of people would be busy scheming of becoming a king or a lord.<br /><br />also its funny how dictators want the stability instead of freedom (free as in friend) lol.<br />the psychological portrait of a persona who left that post (lets believe for a second that ur playing me) is one of an insecure, weak bitch who sees his imaginary world crumble before his very eyes. basically like plato&#39;s backstory, and you share a lot of points lol.<br />all more to illustrate how your delusions shape your thoughts. oh shit, im too rational today, i hate myself.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Nothing is subjective. Everything in the whole universe is objective.</span><br />events happening in the universe are objective. whatever happens in your head is subjective. its simple man.<br />if ur going the objective realism route though, im not going to waste my time. keep in mind though that your judgement is clouded by illusions, the shades on the wall.<br /><br />overall nice autistic wall of text, i rate it 5/10 for the effort.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: ee2f9d1ddc8e41afa99a8edaaa802bdedafe99178ed6f66667a6697a0d126663.ogg
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;this silly meme song gave me more emotions than my entire life in 8 minutes and 17 seconds</span><br />it&#39;s not like I&#39;m going anywhere haha


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 8749c10d9fc7c59fb7ebd8a063f165b982e44bbbdafc07b3338b80451ce0208d.jpg
Comment:
  Hello frens,<br />Please check out<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://astrochan.xyz'>https://astrochan.xyz</a><br />Tor: <a rel='noreferrer' href='http://7l7kiafdwsqg6jmsddqrndhovkw4rugty7lajk2kpzhco6zyndwygyad.onion/'>http://7l7kiafdwsqg6jmsddqrndhovkw4rugty7lajk2kpzhco6zyndwygyad.onion/</a><br />Thanks!


Board: a
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post2005'>&gt;&gt;2005</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Why did gay boy that died turn into massive cum monster?</span><br />I&#39;ve never seen Evangelion but you may have just watched some cuckime. Male disposability is a common theme in cuckimes. Some of the other themes are(not and exhaustive list):<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;girl beats up guys and it&#39;s portrayed as ....hahah....comedy.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;guys willing to sacrifice their lives to protect girls</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;a guy&#39;s life in incomplete unless he has something/someone to protect...like why the fuck can&#39;t men just live for themselves without being a slave to someone or something?</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;girls/women killing boys/men</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;guys whiteknighting for girls who may have deserve whatever treatment they are dealt but the whiteknights just rush in to save them without knowing the facts because vagina...I mean reasons.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;other double standards and misandry that would make even the &quot;kill all men&quot; feminists blush</span><br />Anyways don&#39;t watch cuckimes because it will condition you to be a SIMP(sucker idolizing mediocre pussy), a whiteknight, and a cuck.<br /><br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10370'>&gt;&gt;10370</a><br />Thinking back fecebook was out of fashion in 2014, it was a turning point in social media but then wrong got worst, facebook bought the competitors and the general moved from PC to phone. I can say that normie&#39;s addiction since then is 100% artificially induced


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt; Knives are extremely suboptimal for a defender, they&#39;re only any good for attackers.</span><br />That&#39;s bullshit. The difference between an attack and selfdefense is a legal one, and nothing else. If some tool is suitable to attack someone with it, it&#39;s equally suitable for use in self defense. Selfdefense is the act neccessary to protect ones rights against an unlawful attacker. As a matter of fact, the acts sanctioned by selfdefense for practical reasons are higher on the continuum of force, than the acts committed by the respective attacker. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; killing an unarmed attacker is unreasonable, because unarmed attackers can&#39;t really hurt you, boohoohoo</span><br />Huh. I could choke you to death, throw you in such a way, that you fall on your head, could jump on or stompkick your head and other vital regions... Maybe there&#39;s also a rock in reach, with which I can crack your skull. I probably also would be able to snap your neck, but I always found necklocks to be unreliable and too hard to apply. But I tend to wear a belt, which is usable as a garotte, which in turn would be a good way to break someones neck... Do you really think, that unarmed attackers couldn&#39;t do any serious damage? And you also can&#39;t know, that I&#39;m not armed, should I ever attack you. I very well might be.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 67c2040b3ef50cdbd2f3abe91b7cec0f8e72e77895c60c9eafd23fdf4ef81858.webm
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17697'>&gt;&gt;17697</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;hurr durr you argued with something therfore you don&#39;t understand it</span><br />why does this faggot show up in every thread? every fucking thread. even on /tech/ and /g/. maybe im just an eternal newfag and this is a standard template trolling method<br /><a class='reference' href='#post17693'>&gt;&gt;17693</a><br />based<br /><a class='reference' href='#post17706'>&gt;&gt;17706</a><br />based


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17704'>&gt;&gt;17704</a><br />No, they aren&#39;t. And the rest of your assertions are uncited crap you probably know nothing about. Knives over 3 inches are useless for self defence? I don&#39;t think so, suka.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 972240b0b156ea9791baa140a4882bc7acfd1f867a56639609c6b542c1435c30.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18224'>&gt;&gt;18224</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The difference between an attack and selfdefense is a legal one, and nothing else.</span><br />&quot;Your Honor, I stabbed him 28 times in self-defense, I swear!&quot;<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Huh.</span><br />Imagine a situation where such an assassin actually wants to kill you instead of extorting money or some shit. That&#39;s right, it&#39;s slim.<br />Unarmed attackers certainly can hurt you but it&#39;s not enough to justify killing.<br />Though I suppose it&#39;s likely that something like<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;be at shady alley</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;some big nig appears neat your location</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;grabs you and throws a couple of punches to intimidate</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;demands money</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;you are hurt and shocked</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;panic</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;pull out knife and stab the nig in the stomach</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;suddenly a lot of blood</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;nig stands for a while and collapses but you run away as soon as he releases you</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;later the body of the guy is found and reported, the murder case is assigned</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;detective cannot solve it and it becomes a dead case, no witnesses, no trails, the dna at the scene cannot be matched because you have never been charged and dna givings aren&#39;t obligatory yet</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;you get away with legit murder</span><br />I don&#39;t know how exactly murder solving works but I suppose it&#39;s possible.<br />Overall this talks against your case, because it lets you stab nigs in shady valleys and police has to get all those unsolvable murders, and it falls completely out of scope of self-defense, as you probably are supposed to report that shit to ambulance and police immediately or it is a murder case. Also it&#39;s not likely that the situation develops exactly like that.<br />But it speaks in favor of your case giving an assumed honest citizen was protected.<br /><br />Overall I have rethought my position and I think the total ban on knives is stupid if not for a reason that some people could pull that off (maybe one could introduce something like combat knife license or something) then for a reason that it&#39;s not as easily enforceable. Literally any stupid sharp piece of garbage can be used to stab people, including kitchen knives, and frisk searching everybody on a street is just impossible.<br />Though you are still autistic as fuck and the fact that knives are impossible to control doesn&#39;t speak in your favor. That means that people who want to protect themselves with a knife can still do so despite the law.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8026'>&gt;&gt;8026</a><br />I would like you to think about what morals actually are and where do they come from. It is a set of rules that comes apparently from nowhere (though i would personally guess that it has to do with evolution - tribes with no morals couldnt make it too far), that has parts that everybody seems to agree on (dont murder, steal, rape, etc) and some parts people disagree on (abortion). All of these rules are completely arbitrary though, arent they. There is no objective reason you couldnt just go and murder a random person, just your morals. <br />On the topic of murder, its interesting to see some people ceasing to see niggers as human and therefore (in their eyes) loosing all the moral protections humans normally have, allowing them to consider things like simply genociding them all as an option. Most people see them as human though so a black genocide seems like about as heinous as you can get. If you are one of these, imagine a black supermacist proclaiming that all white people should die because they are evil and subhuman. I hope you can see the moral relativism in that. <br />There is no objective good and bad. There is no entity that judges your actions, theres only the society that agrees on condoning certain things. At the end of the day, on the grand scale of things, murdering a human is not much worse than &#39;murdering&#39; an ant. <br /><br />To answer the question, yes it is, though i believe most people would disagree with you and even want you to face consequences should you act on it. It just is this much incompatible with the moral values of the rest of society we live in. I can imagine though that if we lived in a society where it would be okay to murder somebody for understanding the basics of ethics, your opinion may even be the law. Interestingly, in some places it is completely legal to murder somebody, usually if he done enough &#39;wrong&#39; (wrong as in seriously incompatible with the moral values of whatever society he done it in). <br /><br />If you still dont believe me, feel free to give me an example of an absolute moral truth.<br /><br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8037'>&gt;&gt;8037</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;but that your goal should be to find as good solution as possible.</span><br />Youve completely failed to understand anything ive written. The issue is that some solutions are better for some groups of people while other solutions are better for some other groups of people. <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Historically, communities of all sizes that have real free speech have generated ideas of much better quality, while hugboxes stagnate into useless criclejerks. </span><br />So what? That doesnt necessarily mean that free speech is good. These people would obviously very much rather have the hugbox rather than generating new ideas. <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; There is destroying a sophisticated culture by bringing in shit tier niggers who don&#39;t have culture.</span><br />I mean, as i said, its not always like that. If you can prove that one option really is better than some other one, then most women really dont have any place in politics. Most of the time though this really is not the case.<br />


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8048'>&gt;&gt;8048</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;objective realism</span><br />*objective idealism<br />now that was a brainfart


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: 488dadceace24a24e1f7c6ee0584865352ef069b450efa1894660ce2092c00b5.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8944'>&gt;&gt;8944</a><br />Source code is there nevertheless, so one can use (or even start) a fork like a Palemoon. It still supports XUL extensions.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8766'>&gt;&gt;8766</a> <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Why take the strange decision to reject xul extensions?</span><br />it&#39;s not strange it&#39;s change<br />corporations do change<br />it gets worse every time<br />this is not abnormal for them<br />but it would not surprise me that - people who unironically think the world revolves around bloating their already bloated untrustworthy browser with more bloated untrustworthy plugins, all to view a few paragraphs of text - also believe it&#39;s a conspiracy that their shitty plugin API got changed


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10432'>&gt;&gt;10432</a><br />How popular is palemoon? It&#39;d guess it&#39;s less than 0.01%<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;gnome and kde</span><br />Gnome is also the first DE to have any decent support for Wayland.<br />It seems like the more funding a piece of software gets the more anti-user it is.


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post2956'>&gt;&gt;2956</a><br />the mods will get tired of enforcing &quot;quality&quot; as more users come in and give up the board to some corporation or small business, instead of admitting they&#39;re wrong and reducing their job to the much lighter task of filtering spam<br />now since the board enters the market, the CIA can simply by it for a few thousand dollars


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4572'>&gt;&gt;4572</a><br />redraw image with bagina and it would be gud


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
File: 572a37d25cdf311cf37d2aeb681a2875e51f9c9391b4743c54d35b4e23f1dd61.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post6871'>&gt;&gt;6871</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;t. hakase</span>


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Hapaspam is a buffer against CP
File: b6e65f898e936b75d7ded80aa0b0bfcc178cbcc7df116eac3a86dad98453bf6e.jpg
Comment:
  Think about it. All politics in the nanosphere revolves around whether hapa and Asuka should be considered free speech or spam. On any other chan politics would resort to drama about CP, and people would constantly post it to transgress the mods. But as nyanons, we can freely browser our boards on laptops and phones on the bus, at school, in the library, and at work, and not have to worry about getting v&amp; for accidentally displaying CP on screen. Thus, the hapa political buffer is a natural balance that protects us against these evils.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: adc7842f1ed597eb13dadd14de457ec100ff11ae346edb2d0eb4a62c72c7bb88.jpg
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;getting mad over what is said by a candidate who has close to zero chance of winning</span><br />white people


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: f99f36382d2c86d65470d39136934c998e0aca958fe54288b81c1ecbc759c4d3.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18222'>&gt;&gt;18222</a><br /><span class='redtext'>SWITCH TO NANOCHAN/PICOCHAN NIGGER THIS ENDCHAN SHIT IS TRASH</span>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18222'>&gt;&gt;18222</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18223'>&gt;&gt;18223</a><br />Samefag


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8050'>&gt;&gt;8050</a><br />That morals come from evolution does not mean they are arbitrary and random, quite the opposite. Suppose you were to travel to another universe, with completely different laws of physics, and everything else completely different. If you managed to find an intelligent species, they too would have strong moral injunctions against murder, precisely because morality comes from evolution, to which they are also subject. Assuming their mode of reproduction was at all similar to ours, they would have encountered the abortion debate as well, and would have come to some resolution on it as long as they were far enough advanced. Knowing nothing about their society, we can still make certain educated guesses as to what that resolution looks like; they probably wouldn&#39;t allow infanticide, they probably wouldn&#39;t require rape victims to carry to term, etc.<br /><br />Any such statement we make has certain interesting properties: it is transcendental, since it applies beyond our single universe; it is the product of pure rationality, since it it not mere post hoc justification for some otherwise preferred state of affairs. It is, in other words, a universal objective morality. It allows us to say that when you have some private failing to which no one else is privy, it is not merely your own super-ego that feels shame, but rather a multitude of races from beyond space and time that scorn your behaviour. It allows us to say that some action is moral or immoral, and not merely mean that it is to the benefit of some group of interest at some point in time, but rather that it falls in line with the universal objective morality, and that any disinterested party approaching the matter from a rational standpoint would come to the same conclusion.<br /><br />I do not genuinely believe that your kind would be better off dead, since your beliefs are more the product of a poor education in a failing state than of malice. But I do think a person has to be extremely weak willed to have no stronger words in defense of their life than their own personal selfish interest, no more valid than the selfish interest of their would-be killer. I think that a person has to be severely confused to simultaneously believe that any of their actions are worthwhile, to be anything but indifferent to their own death, while thinking that value is predicated on nothing. And I think that, were society to act on some method of eliminating all moral relativists, we would see an instant spike in the progress of society, dogged only by how small a portion of the population remained to contribute.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8055'>&gt;&gt;8055</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;That morals come from evolution does not mean they are arbitrary and random</span><br />While it doesnt mean they are random (i dont remember claiming that though), it sure as fuck means they are arbitrary. Its the set of innate rules that if present, it makes the individual more likely to have babies. Im completely failing to see how the fact the the set of rules being the same regardless of the particular breed of alien/universe/whatever makes them objective. Yes it allows your tribe to make it further, but what makes it objective? <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; we can still make certain educated guesses</span><br />No you cant. <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;they probably wouldn&#39;t allow infanticide</span><br />Im assuming you assume an nondeveloped fetus to be an infant, in which case i have some bad news for you: Most of the world allows &#39;infanticide&#39; just fine. <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;they probably wouldn&#39;t require rape victims to carry to term</span><br />Ive heard humans claiming that abortion is murder regardless of the circumstances, even if its a rape baby. You cant assume shit about that. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; it is transcendental, since it applies beyond our single universe</span><br />Im pretty fucking sure i could set up the rules such that a civilization where murder is not condoned could develop. Pretty much anything that makes your genes more likely to be passed on if you murder a one of your kind could work if it is enough of an influence. In fact, we can see this in some animals: i believe lions sometimes kill their male offsprings so that they wont take over as the alpha males.<br /><br />As you can see, im failing to see the implication youve claimed there. Maybe im just retarded. Assuming that there is such a thing as objective morality, then since people tend to disagree on the matter, how do you prove that yours is the one and only universal moral truth?<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; person has to be extremely weak willed to have no stronger words in defense of their life...</span><br />I do have to admit that i dont consider my life to have that much of a worth. Maybe thats where my &#39;wrong&#39; beliefs come from. Or, you know, in case you are the one whos wrong, maybe in your case it comes from you placing too much value on yours. 


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Thread Organization and it&#39;s Influence on Posting Habits
Comment:
  Let&#39;s look at two ways two different sites organize content and how those systems influence posting. Reddit uses a voting system which ranks content based on the upvote/downvote ratio. A karma system exists to encorage users to post by giving them internet points that don&#39;t actually have any value (at least not monetary value). It&#39;s more like a metric to see how well you fit into the communities you join. Chans use a last post/reply system. This means the last post to be replied to or created will be bumped to the top and all other posts be slid down. <br /><br />Both systems have their own drawbacks. Reddit&#39;s voting + karma system makes people think that being and thinking the same is cool. Consider this 12 year old boy, we&#39;ll call Brandon. Brandon recently found out about Reddit through his school friend who always posts funny memes to the Discord server and is super excited to gain the social recognition and attention that his friend has. He does some awful ms paint drawing and posts it on a &quot;dank meme&quot; subreddit given to him by his friend. He recieves downvotes, his karma goes negative, and the top comment on the post is by pepethagodslaya. Brandon sees that pepethagodslaya has 47952 karma. Brandon studies pepethagodslaya&#39;s post history and does a better job making a meme. When it&#39;s posted, it recieves more upvotes and is complemented. Brandon learns that being the same is good and to get more internet points, he has to conform to the community&#39;s culture .<br /><br />Chans last post/reply system is supposed to foster discussion, but more often than not it just leads to people posting bait threads for attention. This is because the fast-paced nature of imageboards and the lack of acountability (or the illusion thereof). Nothing is archived (at least not on-site) and so nothing you say or do really matters on chans. How chans get people visiting and posting has to do with being on a chan itself. As opposed to Reddit with its internet points to show who&#39;s cooler, the fact that you are even posting on a chan is already cool (Edgelord superiority sequence: facebook -&gt; reddit -&gt; 4chan -&gt; altchan webring -&gt; /qa/ webring -&gt; obscurererer boards). So, in order to appear superior to others, chan posters come up with more and more content that will get the most replies so that it will stay at the top of the catalogue. They will say things that they would totally not be able  to get away with in real life, if just for attention. To feel good about using a chan, your thread has to be constantly at the top of the catalogue<br /><br />So, my question is: What is the best way to organize threads<br />?<br /><br />I&#39;ve been thinking of a replies per hour system where the threads would be rated from highest RPH to lowest. I don&#39;t know what type of posting this might encourage. Another option is amount of total replies. But that might just lead to monolith threads with hundreds of replies and new threads dying because everyone is busy in the huge threads.<br /><br />What do you guys think?<br />(Sorry if its sort&#39;ve noncoherent rambling, I&#39;m really tired.)


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  The best way is to install the reddit software and convert nanochan into a reddit clone.<br />Unironically.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8515'>&gt;&gt;8515</a><br />Just use a protocol that doesn&#39;t require useragents. Problem solved.<br /><br />We should just have bulkdata downloads with no client/server interactions or metadata requirements. Leave the client to interpret everything.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post10436'>&gt;&gt;10436</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;icecat</span><br />Better but relies too heavily on mozilla. New challenges require new solutions.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post3064'>&gt;&gt;3064</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Alaska fund</span><br />Whites need more capital to get away from the savages, and to build their own human capital. i.e. society.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post3067'>&gt;&gt;3067</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Kamala, is nominated</span><br />This aged like moldy dick cheese.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post5096'>&gt;&gt;5096</a><br />Seethehehehehehehehehehheeheheheheh he  hehe ehe eing<br />No one mentioned Tramp you faggot


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 1de7ef0c049b8175fb2c54b2b65996e66bbbe87f1fe3d417f83a7eea70b8556e.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17693'>&gt;&gt;17693</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;daily anal exams</span>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18227'>&gt;&gt;18227</a><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Unarmed attackers certainly can hurt you but it&#39;s not enough to justify killing.</span><br /><br />I&#39;ve just described several ways, how an unarmed person can kill someone: <a class='reference' href='#post18224'>&gt;&gt;18224</a> <br />Those things don&#39;t require much training at all.<br /><br />If you&#39;re attacked by someone, you can&#39;t know, whether he&#39;s armed, and you can&#39;t know, what he&#39;s capable of. So you have to consider the possibility, that your attacker is going to pull something similar to what I&#39;ve described, which basically means, that an unarmed attack should be considered to be potentially lethal, because there&#39;s the possibility, that he is. So in a reasonable world, lethal self-defense against unarmed attackers must be on the table, or else there&#39;s a class of attackers you can&#39;t defend against, and the law legally forces you to become a victim, which would invalidate one of the basic principles of &quot;law&quot;, as this would protect the unlawful while penalizing the lawful.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;maybe one could introduce something like combat knife license or something</span><br />You have a loicense for that, mate?<br />Seriously though: Licenses are the first step towards prohibition. After being introduced - maybe even for good reasons, licensing always expands and ruins freedom. Look for example on drug licensing - about 100 years ago you were able to buy cocaine in a pharmacy without any restrictions. You may say, that that&#39;s bad, and it was good, that that was made illegal. But today you can&#39;t buy most medications without seeing a doctor first, even if you know perfectly well which medication you need. The legal restrictions also made medications much more expensive than they would be, if medications were traded like almost every other commodity. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;That means that people who want to protect themselves with a knife can still do so despite the law.</span><br />If knifes were illegal or licensed, innocent people would be victimized by the state just for carrying a knife. It would also reduce the rate of otherwise law-abiding citizens that are being armed with at least a pointy piece of metal, which of course would reduce the risk of criminals, especially, if they arm up only when they&#39;re doing crime, as their chance of running into an helpless victim would be greatly increased. If you assume, that criminals are rational, they&#39;d be in favor of such legislation.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18232'>&gt;&gt;18232</a><br />Or maybe it really looks like a nice place and that was an honest opinion


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 35c2b2d43ef002069acedb6f6e2d1272d3a59a6c3e50602e1703d78555e8cbf0.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18236'>&gt;&gt;18236</a><br />We can throw a lot of arguments around.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; I&#39;ve just described several ways, how an unarmed person can kill someone</span><br />Chances are, you will be dead even with a gun, knife, tazor and whatever else against even an unarmed individual.<br />The situations you described could go sour for a defender really easily. You could be unable to pull out a knife or a gun before the attacker does something, etcetera.<br />Also if attackers anticipate resistance, they could camp you with guns ready or with a knock on the head from behind.<br />I think self-defending at all is useful in a limited amount of situations and not everybody on this planet is a fighter.<br />Also I&#39;d rather give my cash away than become crippled for life or for some weeks. It&#39;s not worth it.<br />Before you accuse me of a wrongthink, you have yet to prove you were in a real fight lol.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;So in a reasonable world, lethal self-defense against unarmed attackers must be on the table</span><br />So, it must be legally on the table before the guns and other highly lethal weapons are allowed, not after. If it&#39;s not, you can expect to be jailed instead of your &quot;victim&quot;. It happens all the time. Apparently even a crippled grandpa with a shotty can be jailed.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; Seriously though: Licenses are the first step towards prohibition.</span><br />Get back to the real world: the prohibition in question already happened. Licences would be a step back.<br />And if you have a lousy weapon control, your murder rate will skyrocket. After all, people carrying weapons have to be mentally sound. So the question isn&#39;t about the fact of licensing, it&#39;s about how easy would be that license to get, in my opinion anyway.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;But today you can&#39;t buy most medications without seeing a doctor first, even if you know perfectly well which medication you need.</span><br />It is good in general that some 3rd party oversees the use of stong substances. I&#39;d prefer it being a friend but doctors are fine too.<br />Also I&#39;m opposed to being medicated at all, unless I have some crippling condition.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;It would also reduce the rate of otherwise law-abiding citizens that are being armed with at least a pointy piece of metal, which of course would reduce the risk of criminals, especially</span><br />You seem to live in the world where law-abiding people just wait to be armed and wreck some lowlifes, while most of them would lose probably even with a gun against an unarmed attacker, and those who wouldn&#39;t don&#39;t give that much shit about the law, like you.<br />So, in the end I think if you&#39;re going to play Chaotic Good, you better just protect those who cannot protect themselves and not try to force some sissy who never wielded a weapon in their lives ever to protect themselves.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If you assume, that criminals are rational</span><br />Just as a random example, if you&#39;re surrounded by 3+ people about 3 meter distance from you, you are likely to get fucked even you pull out the gun and start shooting immediately. It is difficult.<br />Also assuming criminals are rational and expect you to have a gun or a knife, they will treat you really carefully and the situation when you beg for mercy and then suddenly start successfully stabbing is even less probable.<br /><br />Anyway, to conclude it somehow, I think the state has to change first for weapon carrying laws to be effective. This means that self-defense in public (not only on your property) has to be way less restrictive on the defender. Also the kind of controversy &quot;i crippled/killed him in self-defense&quot; - &quot;no he just attacked me/the evidence says you attacked him&quot; has to be resolved somehow. The way it is resolved right now is using non-lethal means, including guns with rubber bullets, so the murder is not as likely to happen, and we get that you don&#39;t like it. It is effective to a degree though. Just like carrying knives will be effective to some other degree, with much more corpses (police doesn&#39;t want to deal with that lol).


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;i believe lions sometimes kill their male offsprings so that they wont take over as the alpha males.</span><br />AFAIK male lions kill off the whole offspring of other lions, but not their own. If one lion becomes the new alpha, he&#39;ll kill all cubs of the old one.<br /><br />BTW, the more R-selected a species is, the less difference it makes between their own offspring and other things to eat. Fishes routinely eat their own fry, if they don&#39;t die after they spawn. Which may be one reason, why many fishspecies die after shitting out their spawn.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Assuming that there is such a thing as objective morality, then since people tend to disagree on the matter, how do you prove that yours is the one and only universal moral truth?</span><br />I&#39;m not the person you&#39;ve asked, but I&#39;d assume, that if you can prove, that some premises are objectively true, you can also prove, that conclusions drawn upon those premises are objectively true, as long as you use sound logic. You also could draw objective conclusions based upon logic alone, like &quot;X is X, and everything, that is not X, is not X&quot;. You&#39;d be surprised, how many people - especially women - don&#39;t do this. See for example social justice, which justifies unjust things to be just for social reasons.<br /><br />But I&#39;d agree, that most things, which are considered ethical, can&#39;t be proven in such a manner, while many things, which are considered to be ethical, go against things we&#39;d consider to be objectively true. <br /><br />Ethics is a hard problem. Either you assume, that the moral code of society is moral - like women do - or you go the evolutionary route, aka. what wins is moral, or you go the objectivist route - aka. almost everything is neutral, a few things are moral, and the basis of society is an immoral evil which moral people have to fight with every means available, or you have no ethics at all, other than the will to power, like leftists do.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I do have to admit that i dont consider my life to have that much of a worth.</span><br />Question: Is it ethical, to consider ones own life to be worthless?<br />Consider: You&#39;re a blob of mass, that can make its own decisions. Almost all mass in the universe is dumb and does nothing but following the principles of newtonic physics. If your existence therefore stands higher, than almost all other matter, how can it be ethical, if you consider your existence to be largely a waste?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: e53848ac896417d3f728670fa83e4bf9f2659a2bda407e30b7ebd9b0559a67b6.jpg
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;the bigger the company gets the less it cares about its customers</span><br />hmm... really makes you sink<br /><br />All &quot;strange&quot; decisions aside, opera11 was the best. As soon as the &quot;old guard&quot; left and new codemonkeys have taken their place, shit started to go nuclear. Fuck spying govt. Fuck big corporations. Fuck technology.<br />While freemason monkeys were preparing plastic graves, plastic consuming kids were chopping off their dicks and now we have modern spineless cuck of a man.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;best browser for windows</span><br />what the fuck nigger its the same garbage available for nix/bsd


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  links -g<br />The retarded CSS snow freezes firecux. You can fix this by adding more bloat (plugins), or using a real browser that ignores garbage standards such as CSS.<br />You can probably use it in kikedows too.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;Chances are, you will be dead even with a gun, knife, tazor and whatever else against even an unarmed individual.</span><br />Those chances are much higher without those things. You&#39;re more or less concluding, that you shouldn&#39;t try at all, because you may fail, if you try.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I think self-defending at all is useful in a limited amount of situations and not everybody on this planet is a fighter.</span><br />Let me tell you a fact about military training: You can&#39;t know who will perform well in combat, and who&#39;ll break down. Even special forces training doesn&#39;t allow you to predict if someone&#39;s going to break as soon as people try to kill him. Special forces screen for psychopathic traits, because psychopaths tend to perform better in combat roles, but even those often preak down as soon as the killing starts. What I mean by that is, that even some special forces dudes are incapable of fighting. <br /><br />However, there are more people capable of fighting in the general population, than in the military, if you count total numbers, so you&#39;d disarm more people capable of fighting by banning weapons for civilians, than if you&#39;d ban weapons for soldiers. If your aim is to enable people to fight, if they&#39;re capable of doing so, disarming the police and military has less of an impact than disarming the general populace. We&#39;ll both agree, that people, who are incapable of fighting, won&#39;t fight in any case.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Before you accuse me of a wrongthink, you have yet to prove you were in a real fight lol.</span><br />Why? What has one thing to do with the other?<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Apparently even a crippled grandpa with a shotty can be jailed.</span><br />I may be overly optimistic here, but I still believe, that justice has to follow the principles of justness, and if it doesn&#39;t, it&#39;s nothing but legalized crime.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Get back to the real world: the prohibition in question already happened. Licences would be a step back.</span><br />Not where I live when it comes to knifes, which were the original topic. But I&#39;d apply the same principles on all kinds of weapons, so yes, the prohibition has already happened, and that&#39;s a bad thing.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;And if you have a lousy weapon control, your murder rate will skyrocket.</span><br />If you have good weapon control, all kinds of violent crime against unarmed victims will skyrocket. But maybe they&#39;ll survive more often (heavily traumatized). Why is that better?<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;After all, people carrying weapons have to be mentally sound. </span><br />Are you aware, that, historically seen, weapon control is a rather new thing? How did people survive in the past, where the law often not only allowed but demanded, that everyone must have the latest military technology at home?<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;So the question isn&#39;t about the fact of licensing, it&#39;s about how easy would be that license to get, in my opinion anyway.</span><br />Assume, that your state becomes tyrannical and chooses to disarm the population - How much easier would this be, if weapons have to be registered, as would be the logical conclusion of every licensing scheme? Or do you think, that people should not stand a chance against tyranny?<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;It is good in general that some 3rd party oversees the use of stong substances. I&#39;d prefer it being a friend but doctors are fine too.</span><br />A agree, that oversight is a good thing, and I&#39;m also against being medicated, but imagine, that someone has a crippling condition, but not enough money to see a doctor as well as buy his medication. Would you rather tell this person to go fuck himself, because no treatment is better than treatment without any oversight? <br /><br />I think, that it&#39;s very likely, that due to the increased prices insurance becomes mandatory, because it&#39;s bad press, the people die as the result of some well-meaning law. If some law causes problems, the law is not redacted, but more laws are passed, to deal with the resulting problems. <br /><br />Today there are more laws than in any other time in human history. But I wouldn&#39;t argue, that the total amount of problems has been reduced during the past centuries. So passing additional laws appears to be a bad way of solving problems.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You seem to live in the world where law-abiding people just wait to be armed and wreck some lowlifes</span><br />I certainly do. Maybe not everyone else, but the number of those people certainly isn&#39;t zero.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;So, in the end I think if you&#39;re going to play Chaotic Good</span><br />I like your description of my ethical system, even though I think, that &quot;chaotic lawful&quot; would be a more accurate description, even though it&#39;s against the rules. ;)<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;and not try to force some sissy</span><br />I wouldn&#39;t force anyone.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;if you&#39;re surrounded by 3+ people about 3 meter distance from you, you are likely to get fucked even you pull out the gun and start shooting immediately. It is difficult.</span><br />If those criminals don&#39;t care about their own lifes, you&#39;re correct. But I would take out at least one. So the rational criminal would have to decide, whether the pleasure of fucking me is worth a 30% chance of getting killed while trying. I&#39;d assume, that most rational criminals would decide against it, while irrational criminals would be taken out over time by holy darwin. But if there&#39;s a 0% chance of dying, because they know, that I&#39;ve been legally disarmed, the rational choice would be to attack.<br /><br />I think, that your last paragraph is very insightful. Laws are about solving problems, and I think that what you wrote is a reasonable conclusion. But it&#39;s not the only possible conclusion, that&#39;s reasonable. I think, that my way is based upon principles, while yours is based upon practicalities. I&#39;d therefore argue, that my philosophy is the more &quot;lawful&quot; one, as laws should be based upon universal principles, not mere opinions.<br /><br />See also: <br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_iustitia,_et_pereat_mundus'>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_iustitia,_et_pereat_mundus</a><br /><br />


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: 9406c680be96b2c18f5a8c640a2f1a7e17ad780d15219f41de326d9cd2785fe0.png
Comment:
  Serious question: Which programming language community would Hortler not throwa ina the pizza la oven?<br /><br />I need to write a computer program but I don&#39;t have time to deal with trannies or jews, so just fucking suggest me a language I can avoid this shit.<br /><br />thank you for! 


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 89833dee54dd4e0fc84172393c64a2d712737d73a99c5a1f21adad6fa21e8c1f.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18240'>&gt;&gt;18240</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Those chances are much higher without those things.</span><br />Those chances will also vary depending on the individual and the situation, just like you said in<br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;You can&#39;t know who will perform well in combat, and who&#39;ll break down.</span><br />I would also add that the situation will be highly volatile. Everybody&#39;s going to miss and do some blunder moves, even highly trained individuals.<br />This all, combined with your demand to show you some principles, results in the following principle:<br /><br />The more human lives is saved, the better (even for low quality lives)<br /><br />This is the principle highly advanced justice has to live by.<br />According to this principle, if people are dropping like flies, it&#39;s bad and we should prevent this. It has the direct ties with the murder taboo because it could be rather easy to use the excuse of self-defense to go on a murder spree.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; However, there are more people capable of fighting in the general population, than in the military, if you count total numbers</span><br />Another point that has been made is that it is not about fighting, it is about deescalating potentially violent situations. The way weapons could deescalate this is as you said, by making criminals assume the victim is armed. Though like I&#39;ve shown, it&#39;s still pretty dangerous to actually fight. So it would still mean more corpses.<br />Anyway, you can do a lot of nasty shit even with a 3-inch blade so your whole point becomes less relevant.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Why? What has one thing to do with the other?</span><br />The way of arguing like &quot;I&#39;ll be successful in dealing any and all of my strikes&quot; is not smart.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I may be overly optimistic here, but I still believe, that justice has to follow the principles of justness, and if it doesn&#39;t, it&#39;s nothing but legalized crime.</span><br />In some societies, it is just to stab each other over an insult. Think on that.<br />Ultimately, you either suck it up and agree that the law represents justness or you start to live in a place governed by some ethical and moral code with all the consequences. Nothing wrong with either of those, but they are mostly incompatible unless you manage to enforce the same law on all the different ethics out there.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;But maybe they&#39;ll survive more often (heavily traumatized). Why is that better?</span><br />Because they would be alive.<br />The thing about death is that it is irreversible and unmendable. Some things that are irreversible could be mended in one way or another, but not death.<br />The bad thing about death is that it erases an individual from the current plane of existence, lol. Whatever they could&#39;ve done, good or bad, is prevented from now on. The consequences of their actions though will be there forever. Overall, it makes a good argument for considering murder a high-degree crime and even for prohibition of death penalty, and for considering death a great tragedy.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Are you aware, that, historically seen, weapon control is a rather new thing? How did people survive in the past,</span><br />We could go a lot of different ways from here but let&#39;s stop on the two:<br />1) people have been dying much more in the past (considering the lower population overall, i.e we&#39;re talking about relative rate) and the way to offset it was high birthrate<br />2) the nuclear era brought a cruel fate upon humanity: basically for any conflict you have to find a way to resolve or to freeze, or else you risk a nuclear war, unironically; I suppose it has less to do with self-defense but it has everything to do with a totalitarian regimes who fear that citizens start to do shit, because again, if you lose control, there is no way to tell who will launch the nukes even.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Or do you think, that people should not stand a chance against tyranny?</span><br />If people want to stand against tyranny, they probably should stop abiding the law. The tyrannical law, anyway.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Would you rather tell this person to go fuck himself, because no treatment is better than treatment without any oversight?</span><br />If that person is my friend, I help them.<br />If not and the free public healthcare isn&#39;t a thing, then I wouldn&#39;t care, honestly. I&#39;m not Mother Theresa and I cannot and will not solve problems on such a large scale.<br />My ultimate point is if you have no friends and you&#39;re in trouble, you are as good as dead. You take some big risks living without any support, in any case. You shouldn&#39;t do that.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;So passing additional laws appears to be a bad way of solving problems.</span><br />I probably agree with this, if not for the reasons stated, then for a reason that a lot of demands puts a lot of pressure on people and basically it&#39;s probably impossible to live and not break any rule. Christianity teached to have mercy on peoples, lol.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If those criminals don&#39;t care about their own lifes, you&#39;re correct. But I would take out at least one. So the rational criminal</span><br />Assumptions.<br />When somebody pulls out a gun, you could gamble or make an educated guess that they would miss - and in the end just go for the rush into melee. Remember: they don&#39;t have to wait until you pull it out and point at somebody. The moment you reach for the pocket or whatever could be the signal to attack.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;But if there&#39;s a 0% chance of dying, because they know, that I&#39;ve been legally disarmed, the rational choice would be to attack.</span><br />Regardless of whether weapons are allowed or not, they could be tipped off whether you are armed or not. They could also scope you for a long time and observe you.<br />I suppose I give criminals a lot of credit here, but rational criminals who passed the holy darwin check would probably be at least as smart as you.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18230'>&gt;&gt;18230</a> братэл, мы все сдохнем.<br /><span class='redtext'>ЧЕБУРЕКИ/ЧУРКИ ВОН!</span>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18238'>&gt;&gt;18238</a><br />Too anime faggish and frenchy (surrenderer).<br />Confuses nigger behavior with the average citizen and then overlaps that with white victims. Get the hell out of Japan, frenchie boi.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;chances are, you will be dead even with a gun,...</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;most of them would lose probably even with a gun against an unarmed attacker</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;surrounded by 3+</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;you are likely to get fucked even you pull out the gun and start shooting immediately</span><br /><br />You have immediate assumptions about scenarios, the capabilities of the victims and potential concealed carriers but have very ridiculous assumptions of the criminal. Now I don&#39;t vouch for the average hoodlum but I wouldn&#39;t even want to risk getting shot over someone&#39;s wallet, even in a group of 3. That being said I always have a decoy wallet with a little bit of cash in it to chuck as far away from my person as possible and run the hell out of there. Point being the attacker will usually have surprise on their side so I&#39;d rather just reset the situation and figure if I can preferably escape or fight on better terms. If I have prior knowledge of the attack and can prepare better, I am certainly pulling out that fucking gun.<br /><br />Depending on the intent of the attacker, a gun may be the only way to go. He might not just be after your wallet. (knockout niggers, kidnappers..<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;rubber bullets</span><br />Just stop. You have no idea of what you&#39;re talking about. You want stopping power. <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Just like carrying knives will be effective</span><br />Comparable to rubber bullets? I&#39;d say that knives can be even deadlier than gunshots at times depending if you get a good slash in.<br /><br />To be quite honest, we need more victims having the potential to kill their attackers. It would save other people the hassle of putting up with them or housing them after incarceration.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 86ddf68cb7469f20f9a55f3cb362caa040db9e4db5c65b498804c8d3cf929682.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18243'>&gt;&gt;18243</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; Confuses nigger behavior with the average citizen and then overlaps that with white victims.</span><br />What?<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; You have immediate assumptions about scenarios, the capabilities of the victims and potential concealed carriers but have very ridiculous assumptions of the criminal.</span><br />It is somewhat justified because a regular citizen isn&#39;t a seasoned merciless thug, while it is a more realistic assumption about the criminals.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;That being said I always have a decoy wallet with a little bit of cash in it to chuck as far away from my person as possible and run the hell out of there.</span><br />See? Smart deescalation instead of a fight.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;fight on better terms</span><br />If done against a group, you better have your own group ready, boi. Also now it resembles a fucking war zone. If you want to beat organized crime by organizing militia squads yourself, then it&#39;s probably out of scope of self-defense. I approve though. I like it.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You have no idea of what you&#39;re talking about. You want stopping power.</span><br />I suppose some of them are going to have a decent stopping power. It&#39;s likely the powerful guns are banned though.<br />Also knives have zero stopping power. No more than a fist, anyway.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I&#39;d say that knives can be even deadlier than gunshots at times depending if you get a good slash in.</span><br />The point was about successful self-defense, not successful killings.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: 80251a910213d80831c0ebfb63efa8ea81b20b29a628b684b8706e494a77badd.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10428'>&gt;&gt;10428</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;literally any game, movie, music</span><br />Nigga. For music I found honkytonk, smooth jazz, ancient Assyrian hymns. With games I found systemshock, All the Civ games, Thrilleville. On the topic of media n movies I found The GodFather saga, STar TRek, Gone with the Wind, Triumph of the Will. I even 3d printed a car. You haven&#39;t even been on pirate bay if you didn&#39;t experience even half of what I did.     Get reckted faggot.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 80faeec6a410053f63994ea8cddeb73864e37697d55b635a692b5ab13f15de12.jpg
Comment:
  <span class='pinktext'>&lt;do you have IR-</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;No.</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;What about mailing lists or to-</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;No.</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;Really? You don&#39;t have any addresses?</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;No.</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;Can I have your GPG key? We need to talk with encryption so we-</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;No.</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;o-ok then *walks away*</span>


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8059'>&gt;&gt;8059</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;smug-chink.jpeg</span><br />Lol u think you accomplished something


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8032'>&gt;&gt;8032</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You can cherish them</span><br />why would you cherish a perpetually nagging, manipulative bitch?<br />you&#39;re the type of cuck a &quot;submissive&quot; could and would easily top from the bottom.<br />behind your keyboard warrior bravado is a very hurt little boy who just wants to be loved and feel important and powerful.<br /><br />well, you won&#39;t be loved, you&#39;re not important, nor powerful.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Happy Holiday!<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='http://axqzx4s6s54s32yentfqojs3x5i7faxza6xo3ehd4bzzsg2ii4fv2iid.onion/watch?v=ZLHLu2gAO60'>http://axqzx4s6s54s32yentfqojs3x5i7faxza6xo3ehd4bzzsg2ii4fv2iid.onion/watch?v=ZLHLu2gAO60</a>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18077'>&gt;&gt;18077</a><br />Hi matter-rich nanon. I need your advice for something.<br />I am scared of the 1% and what they might do with me when they find out. Will they kill me? Will they gangstalk me? Will they perpetually imprison me for studies? All I know is that I will attract someone/something &#39;s interest and that I am at the mercy of how stupid their actions will be towards me(that&#39;s right, wealthy ≠ intelligent, otherwise I wouldn&#39;t worry).<br />God I just want to be left alone.<br /><br />There appears to be no solution so tell me nanon: How does an impotent fag negotiate his freedom with such powerful individuals/entities once they set their eyes on him?(the fag not presenting a threat but being just really “interesting” to them)


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;The more human lives is saved, the better (even for low quality lives)</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;This is the principle highly advanced justice has to live by.</span><br /><br />I strongly disagree. If you go down this path, it will lead to degeneration, because it will disportionally save much more low-quality lifes, as high-quality people either are able to perform effective violence, or are able to shape their surroundings in such a manner, that they don&#39;t have to perform violent acts, e.g. live in expensive neighborhoods. Who profits by every-life-is-equal-ethics are people on the low quality side of things. <br /><br />If you want to go down the route of &quot;greatest good for the greatest number&quot;-ethics, you&#39;d still have to argue, why permanent degeneration for the whole future species is better than temporary loss of life for just part of the present species. If you abolish natural selection, the whole species will first degenerate and then die out, as at some point it won&#39;t be fit for survival any longer. Surely, this will cost more human lifes in the future, than exist in the present.<br /><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Another point that has been made is that it is not about fighting, it is about deescalating potentially violent situations.</span><br />I don&#39;t see, why deescalation is necessary. The way I see it, is that selfdefense is what&#39;s necessary to uphold your rights when they&#39;re under attack. Deescalation might be a nice thing to do in some cases, but certainly not mandatory, especially when confronted with an predator looking for prey. Some people are just evil, and I don&#39;t see, why their right to live overrides other peoples rights of not being victimized. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Why? What has one thing to do with the other?</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The way of arguing like &quot;I&#39;ll be successful in dealing any and all of my strikes&quot; is not smart.</span><br />I don&#39;t think, that I&#39;d win every fight. As a matter of fact, I believe, that my chance of losing is a function of to variables:<br /><br />1. How psychopathic am I when compared to the other guy/guys<br />2. How good is my chance of overpowering them with the available weaponry<br /><br />My logic is, that the second variable can be completely reduced to the individual, if any and all waepons are available, which I&#39;d prefer to the situation, when lawabiding types are artificially hamstringed by legislation, while criminals aren&#39;t, because they&#39;re criminals. Even when you assume, that criminals don&#39;t care about the law, they have it easier, because they only have to break the weapon-law when they plan to commit crimes, while the lawabiding type has to break the law by being armed all the time. So weapon-laws disproportionally harm non-criminals.<br /><br />And the first variable, e.g. how psychopathic someone is, is of no real importance. If some psychopath is a criminal, he&#39;ll be taken out, and if he&#39;s not, he should be able to live a happy life like everyone else. At least I don&#39;t see the importance of the fact, that some people are better at performing some task than others. Being against that sounds like what SJWs say to me.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Why? What has one thing to do with the other?</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The way of arguing like &quot;I&#39;ll be successful in dealing any and all of my strikes&quot; is not smart.</span><br />As I said earlier, given a choice, I wouldn&#39;t fight without weapons, because I&#39;ve trained to do so and know the limitations. Should I ever be forced to, I think that it&#39;s likely, that I&#39;d just try to kill with extreme prejudice, to minimize the risk to myself, while I&#39;d be much more restrained, when I feel comfortable, that I can control the situation with some weaponry. But those are just my personal feelz, and you may have confised my &quot;better not, but if, then as brutal as humanly possible&quot; with an &quot;yeah, I&#39;m invincible&quot;. Bit I didn&#39;t mean the latter. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;In some societies, it is just to stab each other over an insult. Think on that.</span><br />I&#39;m all for discrimination, and nobody should ever be forced to live near sandniggers. But if those sandniggers want to stab each other, I&#39;m fine with it. I wouldn&#39;t want them to tell me how to live, and I also don&#39;t want to tell them how to live. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;But maybe they&#39;ll survive more often (heavily traumatized). Why is that better?</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Because they would be alive.</span><br />I once knew a girl, that has been gangraped. A few months afterwards she jumped off a high building. Actually, that&#39;s one of my very formative experiences. In any case, I disagree, that a decrease in deaths is worth an increase in victims, because victimhood usually damages more than just the life of the victim, but also damages the life of relatives and such, and is quite bad for the whole community. Victimized women often have dysfunctional children due to their inability to fulfill their role as parents as the result of trauma.<br /><br />I&#39;d therefore argue, that, if you add it up altogether, the damage generated by creating one victim is often higher than the damage generated by one random person dropping dead. Therefore, I&#39;d argue that reducing victimhood is more important than saving lifes. Considering life to be the ultimate value appears to be the wrong approach, even with the-greatest-good-for-the-greatest-number-ethics.<br /><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;2) the nuclear era brought a cruel fate upon humanity: basically for any conflict you have to find a way to resolve or to freeze, or else you risk a nuclear war, unironically; I suppose it has less to do with self-defense but it has everything to do with a totalitarian regimes who fear that citizens start to do shit, because again, if you lose control, there is no way to tell who will launch the nukes even.</span><br /><br />I think, that this is a very wise assessment, and I applaud you for making it. Honestly.<br /><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If not and the free public healthcare isn&#39;t a thing, then I wouldn&#39;t care, honestly. I&#39;m not Mother Theresa and I cannot and will not solve problems on such a large scale.</span><br />I wouldn&#39;t care either, but I also don&#39;t want to be the one responsible for that person being in such a situation, aka. the person who made or demanded the law, which caused his misery.<br /><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I probably agree with this, if not for the reasons stated, then for a reason that a lot of demands puts a lot of pressure on people and basically it&#39;s probably impossible to live and not break any rule.</span><br />I&#39;d have made a similar point, should you have called me out on it, so we&#39;re in agreement here. Laws are a cost by themselves, and at some point, additional laws are a net negative due to diminishing returns.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;When somebody pulls out a gun...</span><br />Simply fighting is what you do in training. Reality is much more complex, so I don&#39;t like your if X then Y explainations. During violence a lot of different things happen at the same time on several different planes, and just concentrating on the techniques you&#39;d learn in some martial arts class is an overreduction of a very complex topic. In my opinion, psychology is one of the most important factors for how things play out in lifethreatening situations, and in this regard every situation is unique.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I suppose I give criminals a lot of credit here, but rational criminals who passed the holy darwin check would probably be at least as smart as you.</span><br />In my opinion, most criminals aren&#39;t very smart, and also don&#39;t have a good work ethic, which is the main reason, why they became criminals. I&#39;ve heard, that the IQ-range, with the highest rate of criminals, is between 85 and 90. If someone&#39;s lower, he&#39;s too stupid for criminality, and if he&#39;s higher, he has better options. This kinda fits for those people I personally know, which went to prison for things we&#39;d both consider to be crimes. <br /><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Also knives have zero stopping power. No more than a fist, anyway.</span><br />Absolutely not true. Look at how many punches boxers can take when they&#39;re fighting. Maybe you don&#39;t know, but gloves and the underlying bandages stabilize your wrist, and allow you to hit harder. And yet they stand.<br /><br />Knifes on the other hand are capable of dropping someone instantly, and also physically disable people by cutting through nerves, tendons, and tissue. If you get stabbed into the arm, at least part of your hand will be paralyzed instantly.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;Why? What has one thing to do with the other?</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The way of arguing like &quot;I&#39;ll be successful in dealing any and all of my strikes&quot; is not smart.</span><br /><br />I&#39;ve answered this twice. Please take one of those answers as your christmas present ;)


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 420ea8119ceaff0c14736f56e7d552de91563efa5866656262339238a2d64b52.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18248'>&gt;&gt;18248</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; I strongly disagree. If you go down this path, it will lead to degeneration</span><br />I suppose at some moment in time society comes to point when the exact quality of individuals does not matter that much. They just have to perform their functions. So, unless society actually fails to sustain itself, it doesn&#39;t matter. You can see it with developments like operating systems which came all the way from writing machine code manually to the zogdows which is code upon code upon code which runs a bit more code. Some other jobs also get simplifications of underlying complexity.<br />I don&#39;t want to claim that it is necessarily good but if it fails, I&#39;ll just move on. I suppose there is a risk of such a society consuming the whole world, but I think the chance of that actually happening is not that big. Humanity will be able to rebuild.<br />And ultimately, you have to make more convincing arguments about the inevitability of degeneration and the inevitability of a following collapse should the degeneration take place.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Some people are just evil, and I don&#39;t see, why their right to live overrides other peoples rights of not being victimized.</span><br />I suppose it is a matter of opinion. After all, people do wage wars which justify murder, pillage and burn. The somewhat rational thought about that is the implications of death in my previous post.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; My logic is, that the second variable can be completely reduced to the individual</span><br />Dude, later you make an excellent point which defeats the point you&#39;re trying to make here<br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;Reality is much more complex, so I don&#39;t like your if X then Y explainations. During violence a lot of different things happen at the same time on several different planes, and just concentrating on the techniques you&#39;d learn in some martial arts class is an overreduction of a very complex topic.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I wouldn&#39;t want them to tell me how to live, and I also don&#39;t want to tell them how to live.</span><br />But when it matters you already live together and if you do something not according to their standards, they might justly stab you.<br />That&#39;s why the law was invented and put before this shit.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I once knew a girl, that has been gangraped.</span><br />I didn&#39;t have such an experience but you fail to make a point.<br />Before all, she probably wouldn&#39;t be able to defend herself against a group of men anyway. You don&#39;t have to &quot;victimize&quot; her, she pretty much was a victim.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;but also damages the life of relatives and such, and is quite bad for the whole community</span><br />Deaths also damage lives of relatives.<br />Alternatively, financial deaths of families if people get convicted for murder instead of self-defense.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;the damage generated by creating one victim is often higher than the damage generated by one random person dropping dead.</span><br />I suppose it&#39;s situational but I see death as more powerful influence in most cases. Anyway<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Therefore, I&#39;d argue that reducing victimhood is more important than saving lifes.</span><br />You cannot argue that with such a weak premise, in my opinion.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;but I also don&#39;t want to be the one responsible for that person being in such a situation, aka. the person who made or demanded the law, which caused his misery.</span><br />You&#39;re not responsible. Anyway absolute majority of the laws don&#39;t get a public vote, not where I live anyway.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;In my opinion, psychology is one of the most important factors for how things play out in lifethreatening situations, and in this regard every situation is unique. (and previous)</span><br />Honestly, I just judge from a simple fact there: when fighting against a group, you&#39;re at disadvantage. There is a &lt;number&gt;-fold physical disadvantage and there is also psychological disadvantage because of the pack mentality. Provided that your chances even against a single attacker have to be boosted by a sudden overpower, the situation when the other GROUP of attackers AMBUSHES you is just so overwhelming that escaping seems the only valid choice, that&#39;s assuming you even CAN escape.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;In my opinion, most criminals aren&#39;t very smart, and also don&#39;t have a good work ethic, which is the main reason, why they became criminals.</span><br />What I have described isn&#39;t some 12-dimension chess and you don&#39;t have to be smart at all to pull that off. Also add to that the chaotic nature of a fight.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; Knifes on the other hand are capable of dropping someone instantly, and also physically disable people by cutting through nerves, tendons, and tissue.</span><br />Nevermind, I thought that stopping power is about physically stopping, not incapacitating the targets. Gunshots can break bones and inflict other severe injuries in much shorter time and at a greater distance. I thought it more like about distance control.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 6c400891115211ed1157c224cdd18295ea4626c89b26d48c40b5f9be0192248f.epub
Comment:
  I&#39;m pretty sure I have already mentioned this book a thousand times but this book called Amusing Ourselves to Death describes how the medium can shape the message. It also says Plato wrote about exactly this but I haven&#39;t looked at what Plato had to say.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10441'>&gt;&gt;10441</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The retarded CSS snow freezes firecux</span><br />I doubt this is firefox&#39;s fault since I am only using a simple transform animation. I have had no issues when testing it on Firefox.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18251'>&gt;&gt;18251</a><br />That is a nice new avatar starfag :)<br />I wonder how much stopping power would have stabbing starfag&#39;s loose vagina with a sharp knife.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Social Justice only destroys!<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8010'>&gt;&gt;8010</a><br />Even then, I&#39;m sure NSA can&#39;t track the source of a random post here.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post6059'>&gt;&gt;6059</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What&#39;s the best browser for Windows?</span><br />Why the fuck are you on Windows in the first place? Thats like asking whats the best pair of socks for a quadruple amputee.<br />Anyways I&#39;ve heard Icecat is good/better than Palemoon. Then theres Tor. 


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18250'>&gt;&gt;18250</a><br />Luddites are braindamaged boomers.<br />Compartmentalize, use simple and secure tools for compartments that require security and privacy, use popular(even botnet) for compartments that do not require any of it.<br />Everything else are memes, Merry Christmas buckos!


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Polyphasic Sleep Thread
File: 88e2bd8617dfe2a908bd2ad93519dd7733f7dee862214230e3e7cca895b4746a.png
Comment:
  I loathe myself enough to undergo perhaps an Uberman sleep schedule for around two weeks, however I would like to know if any nanon here has actually tried to accomodate themselves to this rigid, masochistic sleep schedules.<br /><br />For those who don&#39;t know:<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The term polyphasic sleep was first used in the early 20th century by psychologist J. S. Szymanski, who observed daily fluctuations in activity patterns (see Stampi 1992). It does not imply any particular sleep schedule. The circadian rhythm disorder known as irregular sleep-wake syndrome is an example of polyphasic sleep in humans. &gt;Polyphasic sleep is common in many animals, and is believed to be the ancestral sleep state for mammals, although simians are monophasic.[2]</span><br /><br />Uberman:<br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;The Uberman Sleep Schedule (coined by Puredoxyk, the first Uberman sleeper) is a sleep schedule consisting entirely of 20-minute naps, spaced equidistantly throughout the day. In its traditional form, Uberman is 6 equidistant naps throughout each day.</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;A 6 nap schedule (2h total sleep) will consist of a nap every 4h, it will have a 2h BRAC and a 4h rhythm.</span><br /><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;An 8 nap schedule (2h40min total sleep) will consist of a nap every 3h, it will have a 1.5h BRAC and a 3h rhythm.</span><br /><br />There is a myth that geniuses such as Da Vinci, Tesla, or even Dali followed polyphasic sleeping patterns.<br /><br />How would gains be affected under polyphasic sleep schedules?<br />Would there be a positive impact on the individual&#39;s creativity once he fully adapts?<br />What are the positive/negative health effects on the long term once fully adapted?<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Is it possible to form a multigenerational trust or corporation which: survives. hundreds or thousands of years, invests its assets for its own and for blood kin beneficiaries&#39; benefit, control payouts to beneficiaries to encourage/discourage certain behaviors, and have it controlled by trustees or officers which are not in conflict of interest re: the beneficiaries, so that it can exist (nearly) indefinitely to provide at least a middle class lifestyle to and prevent the poverty of its beneficiaries? If I somehow got to the hundred million mark, I want to do the opposite of Carnegie and Co. by ensuring my genetic lineage survives and grows through time. <br /><br />I throw in corporation because a trust is limited (in the United States) by The Rule Against Perpetuities. I am not sure I could trust my heirs and custodians five hundred years from now to not fuck up drafting a continuing trust. 


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  It might be real but I&#39;m not sure if it&#39;s healthy.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;circadian rhythm disorder</span><br />Exactly. Following natural circadian clock is just nice. Not following it results in heartaches and other stupid shit.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18257'>&gt;&gt;18257</a><br />Now the question is, if the person could successfully adapt: Would his circadian rhythm eventually update itself so he wont feel like dogshit every day?


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  There is a myth that geniuses such as von Neumann, Bach, or even Newton didn&#39;t follow polyphasic sleeping patterns.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18251'>&gt;&gt;18251</a><br />You strike me as distinctively east-asian in your worldview. It doesn&#39;t matter, it&#39;s just something I&#39;ve noticed. I&#39;d expect, that the world around you is different from the world around me, so we&#39;ll have different experiences, and will have drawn different conclusions. After all, people don&#39;t care about things that don&#39;t concern them in a direct manner. I&#39;m trying to counteract this difference in surroundings by mentioning some details I consider to be relevant influences, when I&#39;m trying to explain, why I&#39;m thinking in a certain way, so that it&#39;s easier for you to follow my train of thought. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I suppose at some moment in time society comes to point when the exact quality of individuals does not matter that much. They just have to perform their functions. So, unless society actually fails to sustain itself, it doesn&#39;t matter.</span><br />Where I live, there are clear signs, that society is failing to sustain itself in many ways. It&#39;s financially at a point, where it can&#39;t continue for long, and it&#39;s replacing it&#39;s old inhabitants with thirdworlders, which behave very differently from it&#39;s old inhabitants, and overwhelmingly count as non-performers in an economic and social sense, and rapidly outbreet natives. Societal breakdown appears rather near and inescapable to me... Of course mankind will survive this, but with regards to what I expect from the future, it appears reasonable to take control over ones own life, which of course means to take control away from society, and become less dependent upon it functioning.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;And ultimately, you have to make more convincing arguments about the inevitability of degeneration and the inevitability of a following collapse should the degeneration take place.</span><br /><br />Maybe you live in a paradise, where you don&#39;t see the symptoms all around you... Let me try:<br /><br />You know, that mutations are in almost all cases bad, as they&#39;re mostly nothing but random damages to the genome. You also know, that nowadays sick children don&#39;t die, and nonperformers don&#39;t have to hunger to death due to the welfare state. As a matter of fact, the more stupid you are, the more offspring you tend to have, and the likelyhood of even disabled offspring to die are almost slim to none, and, should someone disabled manage to have children - maybe because their disability doesn&#39;t impair their ability to fuck around - their disability has found an excellent evolutionary niche in the welfare state, within which it can outbreed, and maybe even merge with still healthy individuals. BTW, where I live, I know people with an IQ of abeut 60, who have a genetic disorder, that have had children with an equally low IQ, now for at least three generations.<br /><br />Doesn&#39;t this sound like a sure way to long-term fuck up the genome of the population I&#39;m part of? If not, what happens, if you add a large amount of niggers and shitskins to this population? You&#39;re surely aware of their inability to form a functioning society anyone would want to live under, while they&#39;re having a disproportionally high amount of children, that won&#39;t die due to welfare and free medicine. <br /><br />Of course, our original topic was self-defense, while I&#39;m talking about low quality genes spreading due to welfare, which of course is unrelated to selfdefense. With the exception, that the results of the welfare state make violence and dysfunction more prevalent, which then in turn makes selfdefense more important, as things become increasingly violent. You may also retort, that genetic engineering may in the future solve the problem of the genetic downgrading, but that&#39;s in no way certain, and as long as there is no safe and widespread bioengineering done on humans, it&#39;s like speeding towards an hillside, because someone may (or may not) build a bridge before you&#39;re over the edge.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If any and all weapons are unrestricted, it&#39;s down to your individual decision, if and how you&#39;re armed, and the only factor outside of your control is your psyche</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The ourcome of violent encounters is largely determined by psychological factors</span><br />I don&#39;t see the contradiction. My point was, that weapons should be accessible to potential victims, so that it&#39;s their own fault, if they don&#39;t have the means to defend themselves. Even if they&#39;re psychologically incapable, that&#39;s a better position than being physically unable. This doesn&#39;t mean, that they&#39;ll win the encounter, but those are the least bad chances people will get.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I didn&#39;t have such an experience but you fail to make a point. Before all, she probably wouldn&#39;t be able to defend herself against a group of men anyway. </span><br />I&#39;ve mentioned her do illustrate, how much damage someone being victimized causes, if you add everything together. I&#39;ve said, that it was a formative experience for me, which means, that for me this was among the worst thing&#39;s I&#39;ve ever experienced. I may add, that I have seen combat, was wounded, am missing parts of one of my hands, and also have been stabbed with a knife, which people often describe to be a nightmarish experience. But those are things I rather joke about. But the thing with the girl was really bad. And I&#39;m not the only one who was affected. There are crimes, which indirectly damage far more people, than just the victim, and which are damaging to the whole fabric of society. The thing with the girl I&#39;ve mentioned was one of those crimes, and this experience may have turned me into more of an hardliner, than I&#39;d otherwise be. If you never had such an experience, it seems likely, that you&#39;ll consider the rights and interests of criminals to be more important, that you otherwise would, and you&#39;d also have a different outlook when it comes to evaluating death vs. victimhood. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You don&#39;t have to &quot;victimize&quot; her, she pretty much was a victim.</span><br />could you expand on what you mean by this? I don&#39;t understand what you mean by that.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Deaths also damage lives of relatives.</span><br />Feelings of the relatives of criminals are more important than feelings of the relatives of victims?<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Alternatively, financial deaths of families if people get convicted for murder instead of self-defense.</span><br />That would indeed be a very bad outcome, but not the only one possible. As I said, where I live, the selfdefense law doesn&#39;t require proportionality. If it&#39;s plausible for the judge, that you&#39;ve been trying to stop an unlawful attack against any of your rights - which include property and your personal wellbeing without even a scratch - the offender basically has lost his right to live, if him breathing is in the way of you enforcing your rights. It&#39;s slightly more complicated, but in practice it&#39;s as I&#39;ve said.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You&#39;re not responsible. Anyway absolute majority of the laws don&#39;t get a public vote, not where I live anyway.</span><br />With &quot;not responsible&quot; I meant, that I see a duty to oppose those laws, or at least not tolerate people who support them, because I, as a member of the public, do at least have a responsibility for the small part of the public I can influence. If I don&#39;t try to sway them away from supporting such laws, I&#39;m partially responsible, because what becomes law is what the public is willing to tolerate.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Honestly, I just judge from a simple fact there: when fighting against a group, you&#39;re at disadvantage. There is a &lt;number&gt;-fold physical disadvantage [...]</span><br />I would expect, that criminals are going to be hunted down and strung up on the next tree, if it regularly comes to a numbers game of criminals vs. decent people. But now where you&#39;ve mentioned it, I notice, that I should do some thinking in that regard, because this already should have happened somewhere noticable. The fact that it didn&#39;t is kinda alarming.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I thought that stopping power is about physically stopping, not incapacitating the targets.</span><br />Aren&#39;t those the same thing? I&#39;m not picky here, but I&#39;ve often noticed, that people somehow discern between different forms of inflicting physical damage based upon appearances. It&#39;s like inflicting evil wounds vs. inflicting good wounds, or something like that, even though both are simply holes through which someone bleeds, or hematomes, under which he bleeds internally. Just wanted to point that out.<br /><br /><br />Before I forget it: <br /><br />If you want to evaluate the importance of something, imagine the following thought experience:<br /><br />We&#39;ll both sit on a table, and play with two ten-sided dice from 0-9. You pick a number between 0 and 99. If any other combination comes, I pay you X amount of money. If your chosen number comes, I do Y, e.g. shoot you in the face, or such. <br /><br />- How high would the payout have to be for you, to accept a 1% chance of being shot in the face?<br />- How high would the payout have to be for you, to accept a 1% chance of being raped?<br />- How high would the payout have to be for you, to accept a 1% chance of letting a loved one of you being raped?<br /><br />If you multiply those numbers by 100, you have the monetary value you assign to those happenings, e.g. being killed.<br /><br />If you add the value of being raped to some multitude of the value of having a loved one being raped, you have the monetary value of the thing that happened to the girl I&#39;ve mentioned.<br /><br />If the value you&#39;d be willing to play for being shot is lower than what I&#39;ve described in the last paragraph, your judgements aren&#39;t entirely consistent with your ethics. <br /><br />I&#39;m not writing this to trick you, and you&#39;ll very likely assign an infinite value to being shot, simply because you&#39;ll try to be consistent with your former statements. People have a very strong tendency to try being consistent, even if they think, that it&#39;s wrong. So maybe don&#39;t do this thought experiment now, but later, and keep the methodology in mind, because it&#39;s a really useful one, if you&#39;re trying to make extreme-case ethical judgements.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;icecat</span><br />In what way is IceCat better than ungoogled-chromium?


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8056'>&gt;&gt;8056</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;it doesnt mean they are random, it sure as fuck means they are arbitrary</span><br />those are synonyms retard<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;no you can&#39;t</span><br />We made an educated guess regarding murder. Abortion is merely a harder problem, it is not categorically different from murder<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Im assuming you assume an nondeveloped fetus to be an infant</span><br />why the fuck would you assume that?<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Ive heard humans claiming that abortion is murder even if its a rape baby.</span><br />I&#39;ve seen people defend infanticide. The point is that we now have a system by which we can call these people idiots, rather than having to pretend they&#39;ve made a valid point in attempting to avoid the argument completely.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10439'>&gt;&gt;10439</a><br />So go back to primitivism and banging rocks together?


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  I&#39;m the creator of this other (related) thread:<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://nanochanpwz3xnue76gteysv6wjm5sim3bbcm2lc65x625at774k77qd.onion/l/13977.html'>https://nanochanpwz3xnue76gteysv6wjm5sim3bbcm2lc65x625at774k77qd.onion/l/13977.html</a><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;How would gains be affected under polyphasic sleep schedules?</span><br />Do you mean muscle gain? If yes, then no. Ubermanch and most of the others polyphasic schedules decrease SWS (slow wave sleep), which is necessary for mitocondrial regeneration (essential for muscle gain).<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Would there be a positive impact on the individual&#39;s creativity once he fully adapts?</span><br />The problem is you can&#39;t adapt to ubermanch schedule. It&#39;s too radical. And you can&#39;t quantify &quot;creativity&quot;. So...<br />Still, many people reports that biphasic sleep (4 hours at night and a 3 hours &quot;nap&quot; in the afternoon) gives good results (I&#39;ve read anecdotes mostly on longecity forum and on leddit).<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What are the positive/negative health effects on the long term once fully adapted?</span><br />For ubermanch, only negatives. For biphasic, some studies correlate some hormonies regulation (search for &quot;nap research&quot;, hypnologists referer to that as &quot;naps&quot;). See also this article:<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://www.supermemo.com/en/archives1990-2015/articles/polyphasic'>https://www.supermemo.com/en/archives1990-2015/articles/polyphasic</a>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  also <a rel='noreferrer' href='http://axqzx4s6s54s32yentfqojs3x5i7faxza6xo3ehd4bzzsg2ii4fv2iid.onion/watch?v=1lHXfGAlp58'>http://axqzx4s6s54s32yentfqojs3x5i7faxza6xo3ehd4bzzsg2ii4fv2iid.onion/watch?v=1lHXfGAlp58</a>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  I&#39;m just a rittle retarded Swedish grill with Austism and the jews stole my childhood. How dare them! Plz tell the jews to return my childhood so I can have a happy Christmas.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 376cb51b1f6016a750753e6d25a03b15827f81d42a9e4dc80d2c47167c59fd92.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18261'>&gt;&gt;18261</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;it appears reasonable to take control over ones own life, which of course means to take control away from society, and become less dependent upon it functioning.</span><br />Cool.<br />Do you have any place to start your anarchist community? I don&#39;t think so, though probably something can be thought of.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;nowadays sick children don&#39;t die</span><br />They do die.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;nonperformers don&#39;t have to hunger to death due to the welfare state</span><br />That would be true. Though it&#39;s hard to make a point that them and their kids are going to be only a burden ad infinitum, considering the fact that the welfare state and multicultural gibs can be abolished any time. And even not considering that fact.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I know people with an IQ of abeut 60, who have a genetic disorder, that have had children with an equally low IQ, now for at least three generations.</span><br />That&#39;s an interesting case but you have to make the point in a statistically significant manner. Regardless of the result, if such people could be employed, they are not entirely useless. Not that I would advocate for such degradation actually taking place.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; Doesn&#39;t this sound like a sure way to long-term fuck up the genome of the population I&#39;m part of?</span><br />Kinda does, kinda doesn&#39;t. Firstly, it&#39;s probably hardly a population in a strict biological sense, because it is too open to mixing with all other populations around. In that regard, it is bigger than it looks and therefore harder to fuck up. Secondly, adding niggers to that would brighten the stuff up in biological sense. Niggers can make functioning societies, though their culture has only rural socities in it, I guess. I suppose there will be far less maidens with golden hair running around, and I understand your grief in that regard, but it is far from &quot;ruining humanity&quot;.<br />So, while you have a legitimate concern about some &quot;negative selection&quot; being in place, it&#39;s hard to claim that this damage will ruin the whole nation.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You may also retort, that genetic engineering may in the future solve the problem of the genetic downgrading, but that&#39;s in no way certain</span><br />It is indeed not certain but humanity probably still has time until it has to resort to that.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Even if they&#39;re psychologically incapable, that&#39;s a better position than being physically unable.</span><br />I see the opposite more correct. If you will not fight, then don&#39;t even try, leave your spear at home.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;This doesn&#39;t mean, that they&#39;ll win the encounter, but those are the least bad chances people will get.</span><br />The important point to add to this whole branch is that people who fight back are more likely to die. If we follow the principle of preserving the life rather than fighting for your rights, that&#39;s a loss.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I&#39;ve mentioned her do illustrate, how much damage someone being victimized causes, if you add everything together.</span><br />I dunno man. It&#39;s easy to turn your argument in my favor just by imagining that she died in that encounter instead of being raped. I suppose the fact that she killed herself afterwards doesn&#39;t speak for me, but what happened later is not that relevant. She could have recovered. Maybe you yourself even could help her. I&#39;m not going to go much further into this, it&#39;s your life, but the important point here is that as long as you are alive, you can turn all this around.<br />I suppose I am more even-tempered and enduring on some deeper levels of my existence, or maybe I am in some different circumstances, it&#39;s not important.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;could you expand on what you mean by this? I don&#39;t understand what you mean by that.</span><br />Well, you&#39;ve been going on and on about &quot;victimization&quot; and I just noted that she probably wasn&#39;t made a victim, she was pretty fragile to begin with. And in context of self-defense, the realistic thing that could happen is some guy being beat up or killed instead of her being raped while helping her escape. That shit would still be pretty fucked up.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Feelings of the relatives of criminals are more important than feelings of the relatives of victims?</span><br />The dead would be victims and criminals alike.<br />Also I think murder taboo has nothing to do with feelings, as you can fill yourself with murderous intent pretty easily. But it has everything to do with preventing the violent spiral (when deaths spawning more and more vendetta deaths).<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If I don&#39;t try to sway them away from supporting such laws, I&#39;m partially responsible, because what becomes law is what the public is willing to tolerate.</span><br />Imagine this energy being spent on something actually productive, like planning for the anarchist community or some shit, hehehe.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Aren&#39;t those the same thing?</span><br />I just stated that I didn&#39;t follow the actual definition of &quot;stopping power&quot; while talking about knives vs fists. My bad.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; If you want to evaluate the importance of something, imagine the following thought experience:</span><br />I think it&#39;s not fair against my case because you suggest to add the numbers for myself/my love but I only have an option of being killed as an alternative, without options for my love.<br />And I think it&#39;s hard to answer in general. I think I would legit put safety of my life and of those I want to protect over our wellbeing.<br />Also I really cannot quantify those values. For each of the question &quot;More than you can afford&quot; will be the answer.<br />What I can say with certainty though is that I will put those I care about before myself, simply for the fact I can deal with my own pain and depression, but others around me crumbling down would be a problem. I cannot fix others.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;So maybe don&#39;t do this thought experiment now, but later, and keep the methodology in mind, because it&#39;s a really useful one, if you&#39;re trying to make extreme-case ethical judgements.</span><br />I understand. I think some of the values could change depending on my mood lol.


Board: b
Name: Anonymous
Email: hannibal.lecter@yourthroat.xxx
Subject: This is what you find
Comment:
    Randomly searching random onion engines.  To the OP, go fuck yourself.           You want to be tough, come visit Chicago, we&#39;ll begin our tour on the south side.  After you piss yourself enough and I decide not to accidently push you out out on a specified drop for a teener.  Then you&#39;ll meet the real shit.  Make sure you said your goodbyes and are at peace with all.  <br />  You low life bully piece of shit, I don&#39;t use a gun.  Hands on is the only way, inhaling your last exhale.  I hate ignorant motherfuckers.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8058'>&gt;&gt;8058</a><br />Im made from the same &#39;dumb&#39; particles as the ones youve mentioned. The fact that they are arranged in a complex structure doesnt make them that much better. The structure is not too unique and will do nothing its entire existence but consume resources in a futile attempt to fight off the ever-forward-marching entropy. One day it will fail, without ever accomplishing anything of worth, its most significant and longest lasting mark on this world being the heaps of indestructible trash. <br />I would argue that the most ethical thing in this matter is to simply jump off the bridge. There is nothing more preventing me from that than my selfish interest.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8065'>&gt;&gt;8065</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;synonyms</span><br />English isnt my native language, so let me clarify: by &quot;random&quot; ive meant them appearing out of nowhere without any process, while by &quot;arbitrary&quot; ive meant there not being any objective logic to it other than it allowing the tribe to make it further. Random was supposed to refer more to their creation while arbitrary more to the end result. Idk maybe ive misunderstood the meanings of these words. <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;We made an educated guess regarding murder. </span><br />Im sorry, did you miss the bit about the lions?<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;why the fuck would you assume that?</span><br />Weve talked about abortion and a lot of anti-choice people actually do refer to it as infanticide. Language is hard.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; The point is that we now have a system by which we can call these people idiots</span><br />How can you tell they arent right? Assuming that morals are absolute, its either them that are right or you, so, how do you know its you? 


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Merry Christmas!!!<br />I&#39;m actually going to miss the poorly drawn snow falling in the background. It&#39;s actually cute.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 73b755704f464ff3df026c48caf09039f012df00377f832539ca8f85d5d40432.pdf
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18252'>&gt;&gt;18252</a><br />Have you ever read the book they put out called &quot;Political Warfare and Psychological Operations&quot;. Seems like it might be a good read in conjunction with what you&#39;ve posted, either to be read before or after reading &quot;Amusing ourselves to death&quot; 


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8067'>&gt;&gt;8067</a><br />Murder is wrong among humans not merely because of a random walk through evolution lead us there, but because of a reflexive logic: I don&#39;t want to die (evolutionary necessity), therefore I should prefer to live in a society that hates murder, therefore I won&#39;t kill anyone else. Lesser species, insofar as they don&#39;t agree with this conclusion, do so because they are not smart enough to follow the logic, not because the logic is wrong. Lions are such a (relatively) unintelligent species. <br /><br />We could come up with a similar set of statements, starting from evolutionary necessity, to defend the two claims I made regarding abortion. First regarding rape victims: definitive of intelligent species is choosiness regarding mates. A rapist isn&#39;t choosy, and therefore tends to destroy the intelligence of a species. To protect our intelligence, choice regarding mates needs to be restored. Therefore, rape victims need choice regarding whether to carry the resulting baby to term. Now regarding infanticide: Whereas even very young humans are typically a net benefit, due to their conversation and so on, infants are - on their merits - a net negative to those who make their company. Infants are of course a necessary precursor to all further human life, and so we need some reason to preserve infants in and of themselves. The strong belief in the absolute sanctity of infant life is that reason. Combining the reasoning of the preceding two theses, we can draw a rough line to mark when abortion becomes immoral. It is late enough in gestation to offer women a choice in whether to have a child, but early enough to precede the future child becoming a real burden on the parents.<br /><br />The central point I would stress regarding these arguments is how they manage to avoid any premises beyond the behaviour of evolution and the intelligence of our species. That I say morality is not arbitrary is because I recognize it to always follow from premises that are hardly more arbitrary than these. Whereas I expect to recieve pushback on my reasoning, I would at least stress the alarming likelihood that there exists some way that the resolution to the abortion debate is wholly predetermined by our evolutionary conditions, even if that predetermination is not exactly as I&#39;ve outlined. It furthermore seems plausible that any moral question was already settled prior to society agreeing on the settlement, with that agreement merely recognizing a foregone conclusion. <br /><br />Of course, when you accuse morality of being arbitrary, perhaps you instead believe that the premise of predicating morality on evolution is the arbitrary step. To this, I would point out first that any time you behave according to intuition or instinct, you are making an implicit appeal to evolution, since this is the process that awarded you with those intuitions and instincts. When the relativist concedes that he manages to get out of bed in the morning, or put effort into his job, or donate to the poor, but isn&#39;t sure why, he is already making an appeal to evolution. The system I&#39;ve described merely systematizes and formalizes this same style of thinking. <br /><br />The second argument for the non-arbitrariness of evolutionary morality goes like this: We can pursue either temporary things or permanent things. Temporary things are clearly pointless, since they elapse before we have completed pursuing them. Preferring them, we doom ourselves to the fate of Sisyphus. Therefore, we should prefer permanent things. By permanent things, I of course cannot mean things like diamonds, which might last for a long time, but will still one day be ground to dust. I instead mean things like the beauty of a sunset, which remains eternal even as the sunset itself quickly fades away. For maximum clarity, Sisyphus pursues something eternal in this same sense, although his pursuit is not to bring a rock up a mountain, but instead to provide a metaphor for futility. <br /><br />Evolution is, at its core, a realization of mathematics, of which sciences like game theory or economics provide a poor account. While human interactions are often hard to think of in mathematical terms, consider the shape of a bird, which is perfectly aerodynamic, despite having never been modeled by equations or tested in a wind tunnel. In this case, as in all others, evolution uses a stochastic process to create something that might require engineers complex equations and computer systems to copy. When we say that the shape of something is beautiful, we are recognizing its perfect correspondence with mathematical truths that transcend our universe. When we say a cathedral is beautiful, we are recognizing the talent required to create such a massive structure with such poor materials. While the structures involved are much harder to understand, human societies have the same capacity to be beautiful, when they fall in line with mathematical laws, and the same capacity to be ugly when some component is out of place. To try to create a more moral society is therefore to parcipate in creating a beauty that will last for eternity, even as the society that carries that beauty one day crumbles to dust.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10439'>&gt;&gt;10439</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;opera </span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;proprietary software</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;the best</span><br />произошёл кек


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Day 4 of NoFap
File: 756903955c710fabb75e77d1e72ec9f48dada932e2fd59771382e50ba0617bb4.jpg
Comment:
  So... yeah, as in the subject, Its been 4 days and since yesterday i started having random... idk like... brain slowdowns, there are times where I think about porn for a couple seconds (like im having flashbacks or idk some fucking seizure) i feel my muscles become kinda weak and I start to drool (and the saliva is always sweet!) i always try to quickly distract myself from it but it happens every couple hours and last 2-3 seconds<br />wtf?<br />am I that much of a cumbrain?


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  You&#39;re probably trolling, anyway I can&#39;t relate at all, for me it&#39;s normal to go for a week or more without masturbating or having sex.<br />If true yeah you are cumbrain.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18267'>&gt;&gt;18267</a><br />no I&#39;m not trolling, which is why I&#39;m freaked out, imagine how badly fucked up my brain is


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 3ec751fd326eb2010a2f804672631d741ee80e0d0c7e8a38730a136b04f85be0.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18242'>&gt;&gt;18242</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;братэл, мы все сдохнем.</span><br />ЧЕБУРЕКИ/ЧУРКИ ВОН!<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;ЧЕБУРЕКИ/ЧУРКИ ВОН!</span>


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  on one hand it&#39;s pretty nice to see digdeeper get more based than it already is, on the other hand that site gets shilled on 4chan&#39;s /g/ all the time and this may be the first time nanochan&#39;s shilled on it


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: not him
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8068'>&gt;&gt;8068</a><br />You make a point of morality being inherent to some species and it least your reasoning seems sound.<br /><br />However if we consider some other species, your argument falls apart.<br />We also could consider that humanity isn&#39;t the pinnacle of evolution, which would mean whatever human morality there is, it&#39;s far from being absolute.<br />This also doesn&#39;t mean moral values are imprinted into our brains. The safe bet would be that we have some circuits corresponding to moral thinking.<br />Also your argument doesn&#39;t support that some morality set itself is absolute, meaning that there might be some universal rules regarding our species, and there might be some purely arbitrary rules.<br /><br />Though if we accept your line of reasoning, we pretty much agree with the claim that as far as humans go, there very well might be some universal set of moral values to follow, and that is what matters for us humans. We still have to determine the set though imo.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10403'>&gt;&gt;10403</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;less than 1 in 10000 use palemoon</span><br />yeah less than that, but so what?<br /><a class='reference' href='#post10439'>&gt;&gt;10439</a><br />stfu /pol/nigger the web was always shit. oh yeah i sure miss when i couldnt view 50% of websites because they needed flash<br /><a class='reference' href='#post10446'>&gt;&gt;10446</a><br />the whole web is primitive crap from the 80s. its like they took one of those shitty CRMs written by oblivious enterprise faggots and made it into an OS and content distribution platform


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10316'>&gt;&gt;10316</a><br />because that would require an actual tangible backdoor to exist. instead, you can find vulns because like all other software, its made by incompetent niggermonkeys. it doesnt matter if the vulns were deliberately placed there because there&#39;d still be vulns otherwise


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10443'>&gt;&gt;10443</a><br />yes that&#39;s the nature of bugs, and brken by design software (such as CSS)


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: 570512f941f5b224452d62cecb29ffefe2934d2ed8f263b70dc484c5cb40acfc.gif
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10442'>&gt;&gt;10442</a><br />because you stick within the mainstream, you fucking idiot (and even for mainstream content, it&#39;s not great, better use a private tracker). i&#39;ve visited TPB here and there since it was made and it&#39;s always been this sparse


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4766'>&gt;&gt;4766</a><br />Thank you sir. May I please use python instead? I am an athiest also.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;Do you have any place to start your anarchist community? I don&#39;t think so, though probably something can be thought of.</span><br />Actually I do have something like this. More or less. Much too &quot;less&quot;, but more than nothing.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Though it&#39;s hard to make a point that them and their kids are going to be only a burden ad infinitum</span><br />You&#39;re underestimating the influence of heritability. Third-world-shitholes don&#39;t have a welfare-state, and are shitholes nonetheless.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Regardless of the result, if such people could be employed, they are not entirely useless.</span><br />You don&#39;t know many IQ-60 people, don&#39;t you? Those people get something like work-therapy, where they&#39;re doing handicrafts, which then are sold on christmas markets and such. But those places cost much more than their produce is worth. And that&#39;s the best-case-scenario, which doesn&#39;t involve any alcoholism or little kids, that were sired on one of their wild parties with 90s music and naked female cretins dancing naked on the couch with the burned-in ashtray, which always loudly complain about how many children they&#39;ve already lost (three) after the rewarding &quot;smack&quot; of some other cretins hand hitting her face at 4:00 in the morning. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Firstly, it&#39;s probably hardly a population in a strict biological sense, because it is too open to mixing with all other populations around.</span><br />But those genes would surely enrich in the lowest echelons of society. Western societies tend to sort people by IQ, which is largely determined by genes, and people within the different strata tend to reproduce with each other. What you&#39;ll end up with is a growing underclass of genetically damaged people, that&#39;s totally dependent upon the still functioning people, which, mostly due to high taxation, and maybe women-rights, reproduce at a rate below replacement, while the stupid ones achieve reproduction levels over replacement. That&#39;s certainly true for all classes of shitskins, and may also be true for the beforementioned cretins, even though there are no official statistics, and I can only know what&#39;s visible.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Niggers can make functioning societies</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;but it is far from &quot;ruining humanity&quot;.</span><br />That&#39;s a stretch. Without western foreign aid and technology transfers, the majority of niggers in africa would die within a few years. <br /><br />In any case, those influences I&#39;ve mentioned clearly are lowering the average intelligence of the population, and there&#39;s a trend towards dysfunctionality, if you assume, that those things are genetic. If you want to consider genetics to be a statistics-game, due to which most random mutations are going to be canceled out due to the random recombination of genes, that occurs every time a egg is inseminated, you&#39;re basically saying, that natural selection doesn&#39;t play a role, because its effects will be canceled out after a few generations. You may actually be mostly correct in that regard, but not completely, because even if most effects of natural selection gets soon wiped out after its occurrence, the small fraction that doesn&#39;t was enough to produce all the biological diversity you can see around the globe. <br /><br />It takes only a few generations of selective breeding to turn wild foxes into something, that doesn&#39;t look or behave like a wild fox anymore. I would argue, that the same is happening to westerners due to the way western societies function, and I would also argue, that those changes are for the worse, because there&#39;s selective breeding which gives an advantage to the least successful individuals, as the more successful ones are exploited by society to pay for shit, while the least successful ones simply are left alone while they are provided with enough resources to breed as much as they like.<br /><br />I would ask you, at what point would you see a danger towards humanity? I mean, of course homo sapiens is going to survive degeneration for quite a while, and if humanity reaches a point, at which modern society can&#39;t function anymore, the selective pressures will change, and the maladapted genes are going to be wiped out. However, the new evolutionary route, which holy darwin selects for us, may not include high-tech and going to space, but simply returning to a low-tech life, as still would be the case, if europe hadn&#39;t spawned the technological revolution after its middle ages - which may very well be a very unlikely evolutionary quirk. To a certain level this ability is genetic, can&#39;t be taken as granted, and maybe is not even a very likely evolutionary pathway, as most populations appear to be totally incapable of even following this path without outside help. I would argue, that humanity is just a subset of what&#39;s called homo sapiens, and doesn&#39;t include the whole species, but only those parts of the species, that&#39;s able to form societies, which are able to spawn high technology. The rest of the species are nothing but animals. And as far as population dynamics go, my definition of humanity is shrinking and degenerating, and on a downward path, which at some point will be reversed, but then may end up in a condition which we all may find to be very unpleasant. The increasingly dysfunctional part of the population may end up finding an strategy to beat natural selection, which makes life impossible for everyone else. There even is good reason, that that&#39;s the most likely thing to expect happening, as even niggers in the darkest part of africa must have had individuals in their past, that were more intelligent than the rest. But those individuals never managed to have enough reproductive success to replace their more stupid brethren.<br /><br />As I said, you may live in a paradise, within which you&#39;re surrounded by nice and functional people, and think, that you&#39;re in control of the whole situation. And you&#39;re a very smart guy, so I assume, that you&#39;re right in your estimate. But not everyone lives in such a paradise. Elsewhere things are going wrong.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I see the opposite more correct. If you will not fight, then don&#39;t even try, leave your spear at home.</span><br />I think, that this is the wrong conclusion, if you consider game-theory. If you&#39;re not willing to fight, pretend that you are willing to fight, and try to convince everyone else to fight, while you just run away if faced with violence. <br /><br />If nobody fights, the cost of attacking one member of your group is zero. If everyone fights, the cost of attacking one member is the likelihood of losing times the average damage done to the loser. The higher the likelihood of losing and the damage done to the loser is, the worse the decision to attack becomes. If you have a mixed group of individuals, of which some are, and some aren&#39;t capable of fighting, it makes sense to hide who is who, because otherwise those who are incapable could be selected when choosing whether to attack. What this means is, that everyone has to be armed, no matter whether they&#39;re willing to fight. Then an attacker has to choose an target at random, and will sometimes win easily, and sometimes be confronted with severe violence. If this severe violence causes a large amount of damage to the attacker to severely downgrade his abilities, or even take him out of the game, every attack will be a bad decision, because there&#39;s another effect: If you lose 50% of your stack, you have to win 100% of what remains, to be at +-0. It&#39;s easier to lose 50% than to win 100%. What this means is, that random excessive violence by the defenders makes attacking unprofitable. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If we follow the principle of preserving the life rather than fighting for your rights, that&#39;s a loss.</span><br />If we follow game-theory, preserving life is a strategy, that&#39;s going to be exploited.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I dunno man. It&#39;s easy to turn your argument in my favor just by imagining that she died in that encounter instead of being raped.</span><br />Assuming, that she&#39;d been raped and killed, this wouldn&#39;t change the outcome. I could even argue, that killing her would have spared her the suffering which led her to suicide. Killing oneself isn&#39;t easy, so I expect there to have been a high amount of suffering on her side. Just killing her out of nowhere would even have spared her the suffering of being raped. So in both cases, killing her could have been the more merciful route. As I already said, I prefer principled ethics over greatest-good ethics, but I don&#39;t see, why the reduction of suffering isn&#39;t as valid as a goal as saving lifes is. After all, what worth has your life, if all you experience is suffering. For example, I&#39;d consider suicide to be preferable to suffering through a terminal illness.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;but what happened later is not that relevant.</span><br />That&#39;s denying cause and effect. If you topple the first domino, you&#39;ve caused the last domino to fall, and everything in between. Saying, that you&#39;re only responsible for the first domino sounds very irresponsible to me. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Well, you&#39;ve been going on and on about &quot;victimization&quot; and I just noted that she probably wasn&#39;t made a victim, she was pretty fragile to begin with. And in context of self-defense, the realistic thing that could happen is some guy being beat up or killed instead of her being raped while helping her escape. That shit would still be pretty fucked up.</span><br />That&#39;s actually very helpful. Thank you. But in any case, you&#39;d minimize the chance of her being attacked by maximizing the average cost of attacking her, I&#39;d argue.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;(when deaths spawning more and more vendetta deaths).</span><br />I think, that this is questionable, as vendettas are a strong deterrent. If you&#39;re asking shitskins who are practicing vendettas, stopping to do so would increase their likelihood of being attacked. In their homelands it&#39;s also a common belief, that shitskins become much more antisocial when they come to the west due to the lack of effective punishment. They&#39;d consider killing either you of part of your family to be an adequate response if you overstep boundaries, and some kind of accommodation fails. And the shitskins are right in that regard, that european shitskins are much more antisocial than shitskins in their native countries are. I&#39;d therefore say, that vendettas can work, if you have some kind of generally accepted way to decide, when a vendetta is a rightful act, and when it&#39;s unfounded. Shitskins in their homelands have elders and such that can make this decision, which leads to very high costs among people which are pursuing wrongful vendettas. Also, most disputes don&#39;t lead to a vendetta, but to some kind of reconciliation, which in most cases is enforced by the family of the perpetrator, precisely due to the high risk involved in vendettas. So settling disputes via vendettas may even lead to being compensated for suffering a crime by the relatives of the perpetrator, which therefore have a strong incentive to not spawn any perpetrators. Those aspects are totally nonexistent in the western model of letting the state do the punishment, and letting parents and relatives go free, even if the way they&#39;re raising children directly leads to those children becoming criminals. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Imagine this energy being spent on something actually productive, like planning for the anarchist community or some shit, hehehe.</span><br />Actually I&#39;m doing something along those lines. The &quot;civilized&quot; world really pisses me off, and I&#39;m trying to get away from it as much as possible.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;My thought experiment</span><br />You&#39;re unconsciously performing this experiment on a daily basis. For example, if you have a car, you can reduce your chance of dying in a crash by buying a better and safer car. You can further reduce your chance by letting your car be checked more often - Maybe something is overlooked on one inspection, or something new arises shortly afterwards, that endangers your life. So if your life is worth an infinite amount of money, you should let your car be inspected thoroughly after every drive, and also should buy one of the most expensive cars available, as those cars tend to be safer. But you probably don&#39;t, and are happy with some compromise, that&#39;s good enough, even though it increases your chance of death by a certain percentage to what would be obtainable.<br /><br />The price you save in relation to the safety you lose can be used as an indicator for how much your life is worth to you. I believe, some economists/psychologists have tried to calculate this sum, and concluded, that the life of the average person is worth something between 5 and 15 million USD to that person. I&#39;m not sure about the exact number, but I believe it was closer to 5 millions. The trick is to work with low probabilities, because people logically won&#39;t accept a high payout they can&#39;t reasonably expect to spend.<br /><br />Having me as the personified danger, that shoots you in the face, and the dices as the materialized chance, just abstracts the situation, so that the decision process becomes conscious. But exactly the same process happens on a unconscious level all the time. And of course must happen, because the safest way of not dying is not being born.<br /><br />Again, it&#39;s a very useful thought experiment, and everyone should have it in his toolbox when it comes to making important decisions.<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  That&#39;s not your brain. Jews stole your brain and replaced it with a cow&#39;s brain but don&#39;t worry if you do nofap for 10 years(if you relapse you start back from day one) God will appear and you can ask him for your brain back.


Board: l
Name: 1%er
File: 662466718966a272d711d3144a0c269435096d5d1a45426c0df31607191c40b0.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18216'>&gt;&gt;18216</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18270'>&gt;&gt;18270</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You&#39;re better off running your own organization</span><br />No matter how rich you become, you still have the same amount of time as everybody else. I already am too busy with my own responsibilities to go search for more.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I knew you were a weeb larper</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Nice LARPing</span><br />I&#39;m perfectly fine with you thinking I am a larper, it is probably even in my interests, there will be no effort from my part to prove anything I said since I have no interest in making doxing me possible.<br />Consider though that for somebody that has a lot to lose(like somebody within the 1%) to be able to speak freely and honestly there needs to be a situtation of anonymity or pseudoanonymity, this means that if you base your preconceptions about what a member of the 1% would say or think on public statements linked to their identity, then your preconceptions would be almost always wrong. If you look at how I present myself in public you would never get to the conclusion that I am into anime and underground imageboards cause I can hide my power level very well. For example I have a bunch of public social media accounts linked to my IRL identity that i use rarely and only for carefully engineered statements and opinions to build my public image, while in reality I only voice my real opinions either anonymously or through pseudoanonymous fake accounts, yes, with anime avatars, although these days I mostly only do trolling on social media and voice real opinions only on anonymous imageboards. There are persons that hire entire teams just to handle their social media and public image, I think that is a huge waste of money though so I don&#39;t, also social media managers are almost all the times liberal faggots so fuck them I&#39;m not giving them money.<br />In short there are more probabilities that somebody that is part of the elite is larping or is paying someone else to larp in his stead on IRL identity linked accounts than on anonymous imageboards.<br />Believe what you prefer.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18247'>&gt;&gt;18247</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I am scared of the 1% and what they might do with me</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;How does an impotent fag negotiate his freedom with such powerful individuals/entities once they set their eyes on him?(the fag not presenting a threat but being just really “interesting” to them)</span><br />I don&#39;t want to dismiss you as a schizo just yet, but sorry if I say, your post reeks of paranoia.<br />I can tell you that the members of the elite that I know don&#39;t spend their time killing, gangstalking or imprisoning people for the sake of it and neither they pay people to do these things in their stead. I could see people doing all they can to defend their wealth, hell if my family wealth was in danger I would do anything I can to defend it, although doing illegal acts like the ones you described is a risk by itself, you would really need to be a real menace to get to that point and you clearly said in your post that you are not a threat.<br />So this brings us to my confusion when you say that you are &quot;interesting&quot; to the elite, what do you mean exactly?<br />Assuming you have some sort of superpower(lol), superintelligence or incredibly valuable information, the only solution I can suggest is to sell it to them or work for them.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;wealthy ≠ intelligent</span><br />Luck plays a factor in success, so it can happen that somebody is incredibly lucky and gets lot of wealth, it can also happen that wealth is acquired by illegal means or by breaking the rules of the system and finally it can happen that second/third generations might just be born with bad genetics. In all these cases wealth do not lasts for long though, as I said before lot of times families or individuals that gain lot of wealth without merit often loses it all, also remember that there is constant competition for who is gonna get to the top inside the elite, unless they are protected by someone else, stupid people just don&#39;t last very long.<br />Your statement is correct in some cases, but it is also more complex that how you put it.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18256'>&gt;&gt;18256</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Is it possible to form a multigenerational trust or corporation which: survives. hundreds or thousands of years?</span><br />It is proven to be possible to maintain family wealth for centuries, I am not sure if it&#39;s possible for millennia.<br />An important starting point is defining what you want to survive in the first place, I define it as &quot;family wealth&quot; independently of the capital structuring and financial instruments you choose to use, corporations, funds, etc, are just some of the tools you can use to preserve wealth and not the ultimate objects you want to preserve, after a certain point you don&#39;t even need to own classical means of production anymore and you can just go on with investments and property alone, although this doesn&#39;t necessarily exclude owning classical businesses. Switching from the classical business owner mindset to an holdings owner mindset means that you can abstract the maintaining of your family wealth as it was a long-term investment, in these terms maintaining family wealth for centuries is like buying a bond that expires centuries in the future, a lot could happen during that time so the risk is very high, what you can do is applying classical risk mitigation strategies to your &quot;investment&quot; such as diversifying and hedging. In practice of course you cannot abstract this completely as mere investing, there are many more factors to keep in consideration, such as the changes in the system itself and individual differences of opinions in you descendants(as you noted yourself), we are talking about hundreds of years in the future after all and with the rate of technological progress and social &quot;progress&quot; in the 20th and 21th centuries who knows how much things will change in the future.<br />A good example to study and learn from is the Rothschild family, they were able to grow and conserve their wealth through more than 250 years surviving many wars, empires and countries collapsing, the industrial revolution, the democratization of society and technological progress, jews have a talent for this kind of things I guess.<br />As a general rule you should aim to be as much independent from external systems as possible to survive if said systems fall, and you should aim to build a sustainable internal system(your family) that can at least partially conserve itself and adapt to changes, both are important.<br />Some partial strategies/solutions:<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Never depend on a single country, keep your money in banks, investments and properties all around the world.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Never depend on a single currency, in particular fiat currency, keep a reserve of gold, silver, platinum and bitcoin.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Never depend on a single legal/political system, keep second citizenships and be ready to move if shit hits the fan.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Diversify, don&#39;t keep all your money in a single business, instead spread it around in different businesses, investments and properties.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Hedge whenever you can, for example buying gold, silver, etc, is a kind of hedging.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Raise your offspring in a balance between conservative and progressive(careful with these in particular though), as I said before they are gonna need to conserve what there is already and to adapt to changing times so they will be both necessary, the perfect mixture is hard to find though, personally I am doing 60% conservative and 40% progressive where progress has most to do with technology, teaching critical thinking and flexibility is fundamental.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Raise your kids with a strong sense of belonging to the family, they need to feel like they are an active part of it and not a passive one, teach them that family comes before everyone else.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Keep your wealth and methods secret as much as you can(sharing non critical information like I am doing is still fine as long as it doesn&#39;t damages you).</span><br />I don&#39;t have all the answers about this topic to be honest, I am still studying about this.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18265'>&gt;&gt;18265</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Are you a lolicon?</span><br />I would lie if I said that I never fapped to lolis ;) I am not that much into it to call myself a lolicon though, I was more into it years ago, but in my experience you grow out of it when you get real kids, some people say the opposite though so your mileage may vary.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  P.S.<br /><br />I&#39;ve been mentioning game theory. I think that it&#39;s likely, that your choice is similar to the nash-equilibrium. <br /><br />No matter what the other side does, it&#39;s always the best choice for the individual to not cooperate, even though everyone would be better off, if everyone would cooperate.<br /><br />Of course the game with violence is different, but I believe, that it also has something like an nash equilibrium, in which the optimal individual choice leads to a bad collective outcome.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: e24edc67c03bbca455d236a3f3ad22576690e394fa120968f8a547ac94f4d614.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10446'>&gt;&gt;10446</a><br />Has Uncle Teddy ever been wrong?<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post10451'>&gt;&gt;10451</a> а вот и отсоси! лучше на тот момент ничего не было.<br /><br />Opera9-10-11-12 was the golden age of web browsers and its eventual downfall. Fight me faggits!<br />Vivaldi &#39;tries&#39; to &quot;capture&quot; that old opera feeling, but fails horrendously with stutters all over the place thanks to newest update.<br />GAHNOO+Icecat is actually quite a comfy GANOO/LIBRE browser; to which extent a single mexican autist is able to remove the google spyware though? no updates since june.<br />Web is fucked anyway - tor is blocked everywhere, thanks to cloudflare, return to private servers and modern &quot;secure&quot; dc hubs.<br /><br />Don&#39;t we already have a very /g/-like browser wars thread up?


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  I don&#39;t care about any of this shit tbh.  I post here with Lynx, and that was my browser of choice in the 90&#39;s.  Netscape was bloated, buggy shit back then too.  If JS was enabled in Netscape 3, it crashed several times per hour.  And it needed lots of memory, back when RAM was really expensive (it was barely usable on my 486 with 8 MB).  Netscape 4 was more stable but slower and much more bloated.  Lynx always just fucking worked though, and rarely crashed.  Mosaic was basically alright too, but most of my time was spent with Lynx.  When the graphical Links browser came around, I started using that one, and it gradually became my main browser (but for Tor stuff I stick with Lynx).  And I avoid the modern web as much as possible, since it&#39;s designed to require the nasty bullshit like Chrome and Firefox.<br />Desktop environments are bullshit that was added to Linux after the mid 90&#39;s.  Never saw the point, and I never liked Windows to begin with.  In fact, when Win95 was released, I switched from DOS to Slackware instead (well I dual-booted those for some years).  My favorite WM is motherfucking twm from the 80&#39;s!  It doesn&#39;t keep changing all the fucking time, and that&#39;s great.  I don&#39;t want new bullshit eye candy and other modern clown world garbage.  Would be using Windows if I did.<br />And so on with other modern bullshit.  SystemD?  Fuck that, I&#39;m using busybox init.  Red Hat can go fuck itself.<br />


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4780'>&gt;&gt;4780</a><br />Looks like a rendition of cells reproducing.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: 1517ef578c00cf35db8743ac86bfc3f43077130d48a9ec5baa0e9cb1a366e572.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4760'>&gt;&gt;4760</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4780'>&gt;&gt;4780</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4781'>&gt;&gt;4781</a><br />It reminds me of a mix of pic related and ...


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: e750cf325d7e0380cb43c59bdc5bf87346e001e42f13fbb53ed1178492394667.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4760'>&gt;&gt;4760</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4780'>&gt;&gt;4780</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4781'>&gt;&gt;4781</a><br />... this pic related.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: d0fb7911fca345b114d32ede563b2193f4891289aa118660319781d4d7209ecb.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18274'>&gt;&gt;18274</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You&#39;re underestimating the influence of heritability. Third-world-shitholes don&#39;t have a welfare-state, and are shitholes nonetheless.</span><br />Maybe. Maybe you overestimate it also. I don&#39;t want to have a nature vs nurture debate on top of everything we have here.<br />I read somewhere that heritability plays about 50% role in developing of a talent. It&#39;s pretty high so we cannot allow humans to degrade without control, that much is certain.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You don&#39;t know many IQ-60 people, don&#39;t you?</span><br />Talking about worth that way might make the whole humanity obsolete. You are probably worse at making stuff than a specialized automated production line is, and you cannot make that stuff or invent/make such production lines most probably.<br />I&#39;m meaning to say that depending on some other estimate, it&#39;s you who is going to be useless.<br />It&#39;s still useful to determine who is worthless based on some more or less objective criteria.<br />Disturbing point: retards are USEFUL to the government so it can control everybody and call it a democratic choice, thus ensuring that some power groups may stay in power forever. Once they are no longer useful, they will be discarded. The bottom line: if you don&#39;t see or cannot touch the controls, it doesn&#39;t mean there are no controls.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Western societies tend to sort people by IQ, which is largely determined by genes</span><br />I tend to think that IQ in particular is determined mostly by culture, or rather, how prevalent is it in that culture to solve some particular abstract problems. The particular result of an IQ test will depend on a lot of factors, including willingness of an individual to give a serious try to that test. You would naturally expect nigs without any training at a typical Western school to perform worse, like &quot;oogabooga what are those stupid scribbles, my sole purpose in life is to hunt game and fuck chicks&quot; or something.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;reproduce at a rate below replacement</span><br />I see this as the root of the problem. If being smart makes you breed less, smartness itself is an antifeature for evolution and basically humanity is meant to stagnate, and whatever progress that was made in last 500 years was a fluke. The solution: trust in the probability and don&#39;t fret.<br />Also it could be the industrial society causing smarts to breed less. The solution would be to dismantle the industrial society.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Without western foreign aid and technology transfers, the majority of niggers in africa would die within a few years.</span><br />Probably. Some hunter-gatherer society is still a functioning society. And Africans built some more advanced civilizations in the past. That was the point, not that they can make a technological civ on par with the West.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; I would ask you, at what point would you see a danger towards humanity?</span><br />Humanity is in permanent danger of self-eradication at a current tech level if it cannot go for interstellar expansion. And it cannot. Degeneration is somewhere on the list.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;However, the new evolutionary route, which holy darwin selects for us, may not include high-tech and going to space</span><br />Indeed it may not. The thing about the stars though might not be possible for this universe, period. Like, tech does miracles, but some things are going to be objectively impossible. Reaching for the stars might be impossible.<br />Also refer to what I said above. Intelligence may be incompatible with breeding (at least to some degree) and hi-tech civilization might be a fluke considering the list of circumstances, which includes that some smarties have to drive it but then the civ applies the negative pressure on the smarties. It&#39;s just a proposition though.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;doesn&#39;t include the whole species, but only those parts of the species, that&#39;s able to form societies, which are able to spawn high technology</span><br />While it&#39;s legitimate to discern some humans from the other in that way, a lot of actors in this world can make something akin to &quot;societies&quot;. You just say that your society is superior to everybody else&#39;s and I suppose it&#39;s true for you so it&#39;s fair that you think that way. Let others think their own ways then.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;As I said, you may live in a paradise, within which you&#39;re surrounded by nice and functional people, and think, that you&#39;re in control of the whole situation.</span><br />I think I&#39;m just generally more accepting about reality and I want either less from this reality or I want some different things than you entirely.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What this means is, that random excessive violence by the defenders makes attacking unprofitable. </span><br />That was some sound derivations but it still does not account for all the possibilities reality can provide, I think. You assume that it&#39;s a profit-game with some values assigned, but the values might be rather disproportional depending on the individual. In other words, some people might be pretty wild by nature or be in it not for the money. They also could drug themselves to gain confidence, so the sound judgement play does not necessarily apply. Also this poorly accounts for the organized crime. Ultimately, things with self-defense really went to shit with organized crime, because there is literally nothing to be done without making it a war with heavy losses.<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Drug_War'>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Drug_War</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If we follow game-theory, preserving life is a strategy, that&#39;s going to be exploited.</span><br />The point? Everything&#39;s going to be exploited, including the desire for designing the society according to some preferences, take dictatorships as examples.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Assuming, that she&#39;d been raped and killed, this wouldn&#39;t change the outcome.</span><br />They say never say never.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I prefer principled ethics over greatest-good ethics</span><br />Saving lives IS a principle, though maybe a broader one, and maybe not the best one. I don&#39;t believe there are &quot;best&quot; principles, only some are better in some scenarios, depending on what we&#39;re trying to achieve even.<br />And frankly, I don&#39;t follow that principle either, I just humored you by following it, and I wanted to illustrate some opposing point of view.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;reduction of suffering isn&#39;t as valid as a goal as saving lifes is</span><br />Maybe. Though throughout my life I have found that people have somewhat varied things that make them suffer, and they also have different tolerance to pain and pain thresholds.<br />Also people have different levels of empathy, so I want to make a point of you being far more alone in your exact goals than perhaps the proponents of a blanket &quot;lets save everybody&quot; idea.<br />I can see you perhaps denying some humans their humanity based off this distinction but within the game, they are going to do the same to you.<br />Are you willing to start a war, boy?<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If you topple the first domino, you&#39;ve caused the last domino to fall, and everything in between. Saying, that you&#39;re only responsible for the first domino sounds very irresponsible to me.</span><br />Likewise, I am not responsible for all of domino pieces be set up that way, and I am not entirely responsible in case some dominos could jump away.<br />Also I don&#39;t hold grudges and I don&#39;t have regrets. :P<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;you&#39;d minimize the chance of her being attacked by maximizing the average cost of attacking her, I&#39;d argue</span><br />As I said before, the average cost is a lousy way to determine such risks.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I think, that this is questionable, as vendettas are a strong deterrent.</span><br />I was talking mostly in a sense of vengeance murders. I suppose I shouln&#39;t have used the word that has a meaning of a social rule. The thing about humans is that they are also irrational, and sometimes the immediate feelings dictate their motives entirely. Meaning that no matter the cost, somebody could still attack to kill somebody.<br />That&#39;s an argument against violence entirely, the argument that pacifists make, probably. I am not a pacifist.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;But you probably don&#39;t, and are happy with some compromise, that&#39;s good enough, even though it increases your chance of death by a certain percentage to what would be obtainable.</span><br />EHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE<br />My death is certain with 100% probability in following 80 years or so unless a miracle happens. My death is certain with 100% probability within an unlimited timespan regardless of anything. I really don&#39;t care how my life ends.<br />Don&#39;t play those games with me.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;that the life of the average person is worth something between 5 and 15 million USD to that person</span><br />Are those people braindamaged? You cannot spend that money if you&#39;re dead LOL. Holy shit maybe you&#39;re right about the degeneration. Gas everybody pronto.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I think that it&#39;s likely, that your choice is similar to the nash-equilibrium.</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;the optimal individual choice leads to a bad collective outcome</span><br />Dude, please.<br />Saving lives is hardly an optimal individual choice, and the question here is about whether saving lives or preserving rights for self-defense is a better collective outcome.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post2627'>&gt;&gt;2627</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Pic related</span><br />That is why a massive extermination is also needed after the collapse. No braindead lemming/cattle/low IQ masses must be ever allowed to live again. Only the high IQ thinking people must be allowed to exist. Life is privilege. Not a right.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
File: ed03da8502c01f5d400f72dbe8d0bc717fbf06155a1fc891d4475e5c877d56f0.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18278'>&gt;&gt;18278</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Are those people braindamaged? You cannot spend that money if you&#39;re dead LOL. Holy shit maybe you&#39;re right about the degeneration. Gas everybody pronto.</span><br />Oh nevermind, it&#39;s some indirect estimate based off the probability game proposed.<br />I just want to say that this line of gathering data is basically tricking humans. Humans cannot measure the effect of probabilities rationally unless they actually do the math, which they usually don&#39;t; and humans at some point don&#39;t distinguish between some very high numbers and some very low numbers. For example, most people will refer to 10^10 and 10^20 or even 10^6 as &quot;a lot&quot;, and to .00001 and to .001  or even to .01 as &quot;a little&quot;.<br />Likewise, people probably want to maximize their safety but they don&#39;t do it probabilistically and they have to gamble on it anyway, because this is a game with hidden parameters.<br />Also the money in this case can be seen as a quantified effort (which it pretty much is). The humans are forced to play the finite game though, as they spend their lives making those efforts, so they will have to settle on some finite value eventually.<br />Anyway, &quot;more than you can afford&quot; is clearly personified and doesn&#39;t mean limitless, it&#39;s just expressing uncooperativeness. I don&#39;t like to gamble in some clearly rigged game with some actual people. The nature, however, forces me to gamble with her, in a sense.<br /><br />More to the point of the experiment with a car, I don&#39;t think I perform this experiment as I don&#39;t calculate probabilities of various dangers in my daily car life, and the whole set of probabilities is unsolvable in a reasonable time anyway. Also the whole transition &quot;saved money -&gt; won money&quot; is illegal. You don&#39;t gain money from saving, you already got it. And the thing about money is that its value goes to zero unless it is spent. If you are sitting on some money and don&#39;t spend it, it&#39;s as good as lost. You can strategize with it by holding it to buy something expensive but even then you lose all the oppurtunities you could have if you spent it before the big buy. Overall the point is that game is much more complicated than it looks and the experiment is based on a trick anyway.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10459'>&gt;&gt;10459</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;the only way to use the web is through text mode</span><br />kek, this is actually the most succint way of explaining the web&#39;s problems today ive seen. the only thing that actually works is a text browser.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4776'>&gt;&gt;4776</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;butthurt</span><br />Reddit Trannies need to be an hero&#39;d before they harm more children.<br /><br />Merry SMishmas!


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18276'>&gt;&gt;18276</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;For example I have a bunch of public social media accounts linked to my IRL identity that i use rarely and only for carefully engineered statements and opinions to build my public image, while in reality I only voice my real opinions either anonymously or through pseudoanonymous fake accounts, yes, with anime avatars, although these days I mostly only do trolling on social media and voice real opinions only on anonymous imageboards.</span><br />Imagine being a pussy bitch but rich.<br />Also nice autistic wall of excuses, not larper.<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  The only way to quit is seeing the reason why to quit.<br /><br />Do you enjoy all the time adding up being wasted? <br />Are you neglecting real life responsibilities?<br />Are you missing time with loved ones you&#39;ll regret not spending enough time with?<br /><br />Merry Christmas to all.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Also I would love to have a gym in my house. Perfect for strength training and for developing the perfect physique


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18284'>&gt;&gt;18284</a><br />yeah, but it&#39;s like 10 minutes, hour at most, not that much, I waste much more time drooling and having porn flashbacks entire day tbh<br />also I have a strong desire to start trapping again now wtf ( last time I did was in early 2018 )<br />anyway, Merry Chrisumasu-desu~!


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8788'>&gt;&gt;8788</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18288'>&gt;&gt;18288</a>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4780'>&gt;&gt;4780</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4781'>&gt;&gt;4781</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4782'>&gt;&gt;4782</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4783'>&gt;&gt;4783</a><br />Well actually, it&#39;s a budding yeast cell with the mitochondria have been fluoresced in order to visualise how these organelles are shared with progeny, it&#39;s fascinating and humbling.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4766'>&gt;&gt;4766</a><br />Does holyc even execute/compile outside of temple? I just want a modern language that has no trannies or Jews in its community, why is this such a hard thing to find? I&#39;m sorry for Terry but I won&#39;t use his mental shit.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Yeah when i did attempt it severely fucked with my brain too. About a week in i was unable to focus on anything and just watched hentai all day. I dont even like hentai. Anyways ive had so much schoolwork piling up that ive had to stop. I think im gonna try again on the summer break and this time make it till the end, this shit cannot be healthy.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8068'>&gt;&gt;8068</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;reflexive logic</span><br />I dont know about you, but whenever i feel about to do something nasty to somebody, its not &#39;evolutionary necessity&#39; that stops me, its my conscience - an instinct of sorts, making me not wanna do it on some very deep level. Pretty fucking sure that me not doing it is no better than the lion actually going ahead and going with it.<br />In other words, there is no logic in moral reasoning. You either are stopped by your inner good guy or are not. Psychopaths dont have that and are not stopped, thats why they get to lie and steal and murder with no guilt whatsoever.  <br />Also its worth noting that you assume the resulting morals to be the same regardless of the specific evolutionary pressure, which is a pretty bold statement since we can see different moral codes across as little as different cultures, i can only imagine what would it do with an entire different alien on a different planet in a different universe. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;we can draw a rough line to mark when abortion becomes immoral</span><br />I would love to hear the &#39;evolutionary reasoning&#39; for where exactly do you draw that line. I am assuming that we can agree that a fertilized egg is not a human, while a baby thats just about to get born is, so, where exactly in this process of the former becoming the latter do you draw the line?<br />There are more examples of where that might fall apart. How about cutting in front of somebody in a line? I think we can agree on that being a pretty shitty thing to do, but how do you explain that in terms of evolution? How about using fine print on a contract to scam somebody? Computer piracy? Institutionalized racism? Selling someones private information? <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; To try to create a more moral society is therefore to parcipate in creating a beauty that will last for eternity, even as the society that carries that beauty one day crumbles to dust.</span><br />I mean there probably exists the best moral code to achieve that, but how does that make it the true, objective one? Its just a means to an end. Perhaps i am a diehard nihilist and refuse to participate in that, does that mean i get to pick something else? Even if that might mean getting kicked out of the said society end up on my own, i would still get to keep my own moral code that would allow me to pursue my own idea of what beauty actually is and even let me do things like murder and theft.<br /><br />You keep assuming that people acting in compliance with their moral code are doing so based on some kind of logic reasoning while they absolutely are not. They do what they &#39;feel&#39; is right. Even if we assume that the logic is there but hidden from them, imprinted on them by eons of evolution, it then doesnt allow you to distance yourself from different  animals because they are subject to the same rules and evolution as we are. <br /><br />I did mention that i fail to see the implication <br />a certain moral code = best evolutionary advantage =&gt; a &#39;true&#39; moral code exists and its the one<br />Idk maybe im just retarded


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;Talking about worth that way might make the whole humanity obsolete.</span><br />I, For One, Welcome Our New Automated Overlords.<br /><br />...<br /><br />Of course I&#39;m just kidding here, but I always wanted to say this sentence in a meaningful context.<br /><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You would naturally expect nigs without any training at a typical Western school to perform worse, like &quot;oogabooga what are those stupid scribbles, my sole purpose in life is to hunt game and fuck chicks&quot; or something.</span><br />How do you explain, that blacks in the US perform constantly worse on IQ tests just as while performing tasks, which require what we call &quot;intelligence&quot;? If it&#39;s due to their race, it&#39;s genetic. But you say, that you don&#39;t believe in the heritability of intelligence, so blacks should perform equally well as anyone else in the us, since they had centuries to get used to schooling conditions, and such. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I see this as the root of the problem. If being smart makes you breed less, smartness itself is an antifeature for evolution and basically humanity is meant to stagnate, and whatever progress that was made in last 500 years was a fluke.</span><br />I&#39;ve seen a graph, where the average total tax rate and the birthrate were plotted on a chart. Both graphs were pretty much reversed. In my opinion, high taxes are what makes people infertile, as high taxes make it hard to earn enough of a living to concentrate on family life. One problem in western countries is, that you&#39;re too old for children, when you&#39;ve saved enough to start something like a traditional family. Women rights is such a candidate for causing infertility.<br /><br />You may disagree with me, that the problem is taxation, even though I think, that there&#39;s a strong case to make in favor of it, but at the very least there has to be some influence which occurred lately, because our ancestors didn&#39;t fade away due to lack of children. I therefore don&#39;t think, that intelligence is the factor nature selects against, but of course I&#39;m among those people who think, that intelligence is mostly genetic.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Also it could be the industrial society causing smarts to breed less. The solution would be to dismantle the industrial society.</span><br />Here you may have a point, but only as far as you consider industrial society to be equal with large-scale societal organization, which is not necessarily related. It&#39;s a more complex topic, but that&#39;s the point where I think the naive interpretation of the unabombers manifesto is wrong. He&#39;s not against technology, but against large-scale technology. He&#39;s in favor of the collapse of rome, even though the middle ages were more advanced then it comes to technology. But the middle ages had decentralized and small-scale technology, which did not turn society into an monolithic behemoth.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You just say that your society is superior to everybody else&#39;s and I suppose it&#39;s true for you so it&#39;s fair that you think that way. Let others think their own ways then.</span><br />I absolutely do. I&#39;m not interested in telling anyone how to live or how to think, just as I consider my life to be my own, and don&#39;t want to be told how to live or how to think.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You assume that it&#39;s a profit-game with some values assigned, but the values might be rather disproportional depending on the individual.</span><br />It&#39;s true, that my gametheoretic approach doesn&#39;t factor in individual traits of the actors, but in my opinion that doesn&#39;t invalidate my approach, as it&#39;s meant to be more or less accurate when applied to an infinite amount of actors. The lower the group size, the worse it&#39;s predictability gets. But that doesn&#39;t mean, that it leads to bad decisions. <br /><br />If you play poker, there usually is a correct way to play a hand, which factors in all the likely handranges your opponents can have. You may play one hand perfectly, and still lose. But you won&#39;t lose, if you play the same hand in that optimal way over a million times. What I mean by that is, that randomness can let you lose, even though you do everything right, but it damages your decision-making, if you stop thinking about what&#39;s optimal, and start factoring in random experiences. If I win once after playing a hand badly, I&#39;ll lose over time, if I learn from that experience, that that&#39;s how this hand is played. My decision-making gets damaged by such considerations.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Ultimately, things with self-defense really went to shit with organized crime, because there is literally nothing to be done without making it a war with heavy losses.</span><br />In my opinion such heavy losses occur only after some long-lasting progressions towards dysfunctionality, and are a hurtful but necessary correction. Making drugs illegal was what made drug-cartels possible, and now we have to live with the consequences of past bad decisions, and ideally correct them, because at some point those corrections will happen, and they&#39;ll get more painful the longer we wait. In absence of such deviations I&#39;d expect a heavily armed society to be a very friendly and peaceful one, because nobody wants to suffer high losses just for the joy of being an asshole.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Everything&#39;s going to be exploited</span><br />The thing least exploitable is going to be exploited the least.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;take dictatorships as examples.</span><br />Actually, there&#39;s a good case to make that a dictatorship with a well-meaning and competent dictator is going to outperform democracy.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;And frankly, I don&#39;t follow that principle either, I just humored you by following it, and I wanted to illustrate some opposing point of view.</span><br />It&#39;s a good discussion, in my opinion. I enjoy it.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Also people have different levels of empathy, so I want to make a point of you being far more alone in your exact goals than perhaps the proponents of a blanket &quot;lets save everybody&quot; idea.</span><br />I enjoy being alone. I&#39;m very selective about who I spend time with, and I think, that those people with blankets are where STDs are lurking.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I can see you perhaps denying some humans their humanity based off this distinction but within the game, they are going to do the same to you.</span><br />That&#39;s part of the game. That doesn&#39;t mean, that the outcome is not optimal, or closer to optimal than the alternatives.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Are you willing to start a war, boy?</span><br />Did it once, can do it again.<br /><br />I&#39;ve read the second post you wrote, which override parts of your first one, but there&#39;s one thing I have to cite nonetheless:<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;My death is certain with 100% probability in following 80 years or so unless a miracle happens. My death is certain with 100% probability within an unlimited timespan regardless of anything. I really don&#39;t care how my life ends.</span><br /><br />May I shoot you in the face then? I give you a cookie beforehand. ;)<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;long text of second post</span><br />Just be aware, that my little thought experiment exists. That&#39;s all I wanted to achieve. It&#39;s a good tool.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;<a rel='noreferrer' href='http://ll6lardicrvrljvq.onion/index.php'>http://ll6lardicrvrljvq.onion/index.php</a></span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;BrainMagic Psychedelics</span><br /><br />Seems like this site is a glownigger pit. When im bitcoin rich one day im going to order a fuckton of acid and an hero collectively with the pigs that will eventually swarm my door


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18289'>&gt;&gt;18289</a><br />They aren&#39;t working for me neither


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post16805'>&gt;&gt;16805</a><br />i get that too. how do these retards even have cuckflare on their .onion crap


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18276'>&gt;&gt;18276</a><br />Thank you for your effortful reply to my question <a class='reference' href='#post18256'>&gt;&gt;18256</a> .<br /><br />My wildest dream is to reach a point where I have good reason to think like this. Unfortunately I have not found, and/or have not been born with, the nack which will deliver me to this point. I fear I will in all likelihood always be relatively impoverished and wholly dependent on trading my days to meagerly continue existing, always running as fast as I can, but only to expend most of it keeping warm, housed, fed, and mobile. I am glad you have avoided or escaped the hell which the vast majority live in, please continue to make wise and prudent decisions for your and your progeny&#39;s sake! 


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18077'>&gt;&gt;18077</a><br />Are you familiar with any 1% lad that has been/ is being blackmailed for some sick shiet?


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='kiketext'>(((They)))</span> have great influence over Trump but  currently he is still the best option


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: Caution
Comment:
  Today I was surfing and found this page refreshing on some website:<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='http://torprcject.org/en/'>http://torprcject.org/en/</a><br /><br />Be careful. This is not the official tor project website and probably contains malware or backdoored TBB.<br />Just wanted to raise awareness of you folks, as this seems quite new (no results on ddg search).


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4787'>&gt;&gt;4787</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;sex drive</span><br />no sex. the word you&#39;re looking for is libido<br />before you start masturbating just think of all your ancestors looking down upon you.<br /><br />PEACE!


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Cold baths. Stop drinking too much coffee. Follow the circadian rhythm. Get some probiotics/fiber in the morning. Fix your diet and go low carb. Exercise. Find a compelling reason to live and engage in activities.<br />YadaYada. You know all that, but you still won&#39;t do it. We are all like that.<br /><br />Still, try the cold baths and lower your coffee intake. Only that should already help you stop fapping, even though I don&#39;t see any reason why you should. NoFap is a meme. Too much porn/masturbation is bad, it doesn&#39;t mean fapping ~5 times a week is bad. In fact is might even help prostate health and sperm motility.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post9185'>&gt;&gt;9185</a><br /><br />Thought the mother was going to come in and slap her. Very dissapointed


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post9369'>&gt;&gt;9369</a><br /><br />What&#39;s his name? could you give any info behind him? (and holy shit am I late)


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4787'>&gt;&gt;4787</a><br />Nofap is for beginners. The big boys do Nobreathe. It reduces your carbon dioxide footprint, optimizes your metabolism and ascends your spirit into the netherworld.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;<a rel='noreferrer' href='http://torprcject.org/download/torbrowser-install-9.5_en.exe'>http://torprcject.org/download/torbrowser-install-9.5_en.exe</a></span><br />lmao gay


Board: b
Name: DUmb cumbrain
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4790'>&gt;&gt;4790</a> <br /><br />I didnt do nofap because of the &quot;memes&quot;, I did it because I promised god I wouldnt do it in return for something. I feel like an awful perso and a sinner because of that, and whenever I do &quot;release&quot; myself, something bad happens (whether it be forgetting something very important to problems with money). 


Board: b
Name: DUmb cumbrain
File: 293635e88cb69dedbb6f996930db5b8a6398c8919297e09b193eea6847527690.png
Comment:
  I also have some chinese made electric shock stuff (calculator, pen, stapler). do you guys think it would be a good idea to use them when I have arousal thoughts


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt; made a deal with god, wanted to stop masturbating so tried changing desktop wallpaper.</span><br /><br />you are a fucking brainlet. god is in your imagination . realise the fact that you are basically mentally fucking retarded. go and kill yourself right now. <br /><br />this whole thread is cancer.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4794'>&gt;&gt;4794</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;t. triggered coomer</span><br />No use lashing out to cleaner souls who are seeking spiritual purity, my son. Indeed you could use some cleansing yourself. Grab a hold on something other than your cock, for a change.<br />


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4794'>&gt;&gt;4794</a><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Kill yourself right now</span><br /><br />I would if it wasnt for the fact the police would access all my private info (I tried being more secure online but they might look at things before I tried doing that) and I wouldnt want to risk going to hell


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4794'>&gt;&gt;4794</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4796'>&gt;&gt;4796</a><br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;reddit spacing</span><br />kill yourself BOOMER


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: 786dc9b6b88a6770ebe4847aa972553d68a82101d513b86cf39dda690331a1dc.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18292'>&gt;&gt;18292</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If it&#39;s due to their race, it&#39;s genetic.</span><br />Race is social as well.<br />I read that a lot of blacks have a lack of good parenting in the US.<br />Also blacks are subject to institutionalized racism even today, I know of such examples as late as in the 90s and there is no reason to suspect it has changed.<br />Funny enough, the affirmative action policies do not help them also, because it is also racism and doesn&#39;t allow them fair competition. It&#39;s almost like the whitey actually IS unfair to blacks lol.<br />Also I do believe in the (limited) heritability of intelligence but you have to make a point that the whole race cannot outperform some other race ever. I don&#39;t think you can.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;but at the very least there has to be some influence which occurred lately</span><br />Urbanization became overwhelming pretty much only in 20th/21st century, and thus urban life has overtaken rural life. In a country, children are help pretty much when they turn 5-6. In a city, children are a liability until like 22-25. This is a very big deal. Only people who are ideologically in favor of making children are going to make them.<br />Sorry for quoting the books lol.<br />My take on this is that cities are not for living, they are for making money. An awful lot of people live there though.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;It&#39;s a more complex topic, but that&#39;s the point where I think the naive interpretation of the unabombers manifesto is wrong.</span><br />Unabomber makes an explicit point that you cannot separate the good parts of tech from the bad parts. The primitive tech route you propose, alas, is going to lead to technological stagnation and you have to pick between space and anarchism, basically. Even the world of Firefly had some core tech worlds and some hobos on outdated broken ships playing cowboys in space lol.<br />Also I don&#39;t think your estimate of middle age technology is right. By the time middle age technology kicked in, there was urbanization, there were trading guilds, there were trading empires - in other words, there was an established demand for some vertical development. Before that, middle ages were the dark ages for several centuries.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I absolutely do. I&#39;m not interested in telling anyone how to live or how to think, just as I consider my life to be my own, and don&#39;t want to be told how to live or how to think.</span><br />As much as I am aware, the West HAS TO butt into everyone&#39;s business, because the world resources are limited, the mineral deposits at least in Europe are pretty much tapped out and the place itself is grossly overpopulated to be self-sustaining within its own borders. I think the West cannot afford to not enforce the liberal doctrine onto everybody and not involve others into the trade that is profitable to the West.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If I win once after playing a hand badly, I&#39;ll lose over time, if I learn from that experience, that that&#39;s how this hand is played.</span><br />You still have to make a point that your way of playing a hand is optimal lol. For people wanting to preserve the tech civilization, which may include you, it is questionable. Unchecked violence in premises is not good for business. It is not good that factory stops because some engineer got stabbed yesterday, etc. It is not good if workers want to realize their anarchist dreams and revolt with their firearms. *huffs in the expensive cigar* lol<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;In absence of such deviations I&#39;d expect a heavily armed society to be a very friendly and peaceful one, because nobody wants to suffer high losses just for the joy of being an asshole.</span><br />I&#39;m fine with your expectations growing ever less realistic, but you shouldn&#39;t be fine with that.<br />To elaborate, you pretty much concluded that you have to start a GLOBAL anarchist revolution, so other actors cannot influence whatever walled garden your society actually needs. Honestly it looks pathetic.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I enjoy being alone. I&#39;m very selective about who I spend time with, and I think, that those people with blankets are where STDs are lurking.</span><br />The point wasn&#39;t about your likes.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;That doesn&#39;t mean, that the outcome is not optimal, or closer to optimal than the alternatives.</span><br />Wars are win and lost. The losers get their points and ideas all twisted, they get blamed for everything, and their future possible followers, if happen at all, have a much harder time. Don&#39;t fight a war you cannot win if you care about heritage.<br />Also reminder that the point of it being more optimal has yet to be made. Though maybe even don&#39;t sweat it, because maybe the optimal route isn&#39;t the one you want to take anyway. Drop that &quot;optimal&quot; talk then. Decentralization is pretty much suboptimal.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Did it once, can do it again.</span><br />If your war isn&#39;t on the wikipedia page of recent/ongoing wars, please stop with the bullshit.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;May I shoot you in the face then?</span><br />As a part of the game, no.<br />There is nothing physically preventing you doing that regardless of anything, apart from the physical distance given that we&#39;re talking over Internet.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;It&#39;s a good tool.</span><br />I don&#39;t know what it&#39;s good for. That means that poor people value their lives less. This is retarded. It&#39;s probably better for evaluating the worth of someone&#39;s life in economical sense, regardless of their opinion. Like, if you want to start human trafficking, you could evaluate lives that way to make some general assumptions on who is going to be searched for as more valuable.


Board: meta
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a rel='noreferrer' href='https://nanochanpwz3xnue76gteysv6wjm5sim3bbcm2lc65x625at774k77qd.onion/pol/8074.html'>https://nanochanpwz3xnue76gteysv6wjm5sim3bbcm2lc65x625at774k77qd.onion/pol/8074.html</a><br /><br />Low quality shitpost.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Make a cunt feel uncomfortable, go to jail but cunts can do whatever and not go to jail because vagina. Gas the cucks, manginas and pink knights.<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7557947/Shy-awkward-student-19-faces-JAIL-sex-assault-conviction.html'>https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7557947/Shy-awkward-student-19-faces-JAIL-sex-assault-conviction.html</a><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/oxford-student-judge-suggested-bright-prison-spared-jail-stabbing/'>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/oxford-student-judge-suggested-bright-prison-spared-jail-stabbing/</a><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4510778/Student-stabbed-lover-spared-jail.html#ixzz4hFOQ8VdE'>https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4510778/Student-stabbed-lover-spared-jail.html#ixzz4hFOQ8VdE</a><br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://metro.co.uk/2018/03/16/woman-spared-jail-glassed-man-turning-bar-7392052/'>https://metro.co.uk/2018/03/16/woman-spared-jail-glassed-man-turning-bar-7392052/</a>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  nofap + noshit=you&#39;ll see God soon but for best results do:<br />nofap + noshit + no piss<br />Who knows, we might even give you an award.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post9392'>&gt;&gt;9392</a><br />Apparently one which is smart enough to do away with obsolete court reporters and utilize modern technology. 


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17272'>&gt;&gt;17272</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Feds are willing to burn children alive or fuck them in front of their parents.</span><br />Sheeit where do I sign up? 😹


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10469'>&gt;&gt;10469</a><br />I clicked on your link and it gave me a virus. Fuck you OP


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: 1a4114931098fe328a43a5790cb9ea9829f12d2baf8d4c193daae44a6006eae3.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4787'>&gt;&gt;4787</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;How to stop masturbating</span><br />Honest advice OP: stopping masturbating may not be the best thing for you, my advice is to REDUCE masturbating instead of stopping it, how many times do you masturbate per week?<br />If it is more than 7 then start by not fapping and not watching porn on alternate days, then do it just once each third day, etc.<br />When you can masturbate less than 1 time per week you are good already. Idk if you can stop, Idek if stopping would be healthy, probably not.<br /><a class='reference' href='#post4788'>&gt;&gt;4788</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Why is most of the posts here anime?</span><br />You are starting to remind me of a certain somebody...<br /><a class='reference' href='#post4792'>&gt;&gt;4792</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I did it because I promised god I wouldnt do it in return for something</span><br />Doubt god is gonna give you anything just cause you stopped fapping dude. If the judgement of god worries you, then pray and ask for mercy, remember that god already knows your limitations and weaknesses, we are all humans after all, we are all sinners...<br />I&#39;m not even religious so I can&#39;t help you more than this, go to church and talk with a priest about this, it&#39;s their job to provide spiritual relief and guidance.<br /><a class='reference' href='#post4793'>&gt;&gt;4793</a><br />Don&#39;t do it, instead do something else not sexual that makes you feel good.<br />Positive feedback is better than negative feedback to train your body IMHO.<br /><a class='reference' href='#post4794'>&gt;&gt;4794</a><br />No reason in being that mean with OP, he is just asking for advices after all.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Dare I violate the first rule...<br /><br />USENET! <br /><br />It&#39;s obvious that there&#39;s a niche market for a usenet provider which strictly accepts Monero and strictly allows connections only from danknetz. <br /><br />Almost equivalent: getting Freenet&#39;s OpenNet working with I2P as the transport network. Freenet&#39;s weakness is in its protocol moving the nodes &quot;closer&quot; together in the graph (the ones with the content in store, and the one requesting it). Putting some distance between those nodes with a pinch of garlic should thwart the usability of that weakness in busting pedos. You may hate them, but pedos are your yellow canaries in your danknetz coal mine; when they disappear you should become wary of your COMSEC. 


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10474'>&gt;&gt;10474</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You may hate them, but pedos are your yellow canaries in your danknetz coal mine; when they disappear you should become wary of your COMSEC.</span><br />Actually not. If there&#39;s a pedo, there&#39;s a good chance it&#39;s a fed in a wig.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10469'>&gt;&gt;10469</a><br />I clicked on your link and it gave me a cure. Bless you OP


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4789'>&gt;&gt;4789</a><br /><br />My ancestors were disappointments themselves (dumb village idiots) and my brain&#39;s fucked up as I can&#39;t think of anything but fictional scenarios.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10464'>&gt;&gt;10464</a><br />Kek. Runs like shit locking up with every fourth action for a minute at a time on my Phenom 2 x6 (Windows Server 2016). Android version integrating Orbot so deep it doesn&#39;t even give you options for configuring the Tor router anymore (can be ameliorated by installing a separate Orbot with it and changing the proxy port in about:config to your separate Orbot&#39;s socks port). 


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10375'>&gt;&gt;10375</a><br /><br />CP should be ignored. Decentralized imageboard technology is hamstrung by fear of CP. A good compromise could be only showing very blurred thumbnails or not showing any thumbnails at all. 


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10468'>&gt;&gt;10468</a><br />I clicked on your link and it gave me a spook. Go commit spoopy doopy OP.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  ALL OF THE LINKS<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='http://msydqstlz2kzerdg.onion/'>http://msydqstlz2kzerdg.onion/</a>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  An archived screen shot of<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='http://torprcject.org/en/'>http://torprcject.org/en/</a><br />made yesterday:<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://archive.is/jjmTQ'>https://archive.is/jjmTQ</a><br /><br />I didn&#39;t click on your link and my browser went there anyway. WTF OP


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;viewing a website how some retard wants</span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;instead of using your own viewer</span><br />lol<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;paragraph about chans is statist blah blah blah muh determinism crap</span>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
File: 2a1b168cbaefb54fc306d5a2f1e6e9fca26a2a3428d60c2a88bf9c0f6e2330ab.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post17245'>&gt;&gt;17245</a> <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;some irrelevant literallywho inept boomer burger cuck is an &quot;elite pedo&quot;</span><br />the absolute state of chans


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4800'>&gt;&gt;4800</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Don&#39;t be mean to op</span><br />But he made a deal with God and changed his desktop wallpaper. This monty python level hilarity and and stupidity. To add to that you are posting in b faggot, and likei said the first time, this whole thread is cancer and I&#39;m correct. You are the most massive faggot here btw. <br /><br /><br /><br />And I&#39;m too lazy to reference it, but the faggot talking about Reddit spacing needs to fuck right off back to clearnet and eat his sister&#39;s arse for breakfast.<br /><br />Get off my internet, you don&#39;t belong here


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: 1b13599954f179f812815995653a38ad99d05551ac143c33320c1df6bc3acaa8.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4803'>&gt;&gt;4803</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;This monty python level hilarity and and stupidity</span><br />Yes and assuming he is not trolling he seems aware of it, he calls himself dumb cumbrain after all.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;To add to that you are posting in b faggot</span><br />Yes and? /b/ is not shitposting only, /b/ is anything goes, that means I can&#39;t post whatever I want faggot.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You are the most massive faggot here btw.</span><br />I like to suck cock and there&#39;s nothing you can do to stop me.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Subject: /r/equests
File: 2e60ba6ffb2dcf2aa41b4a0523386054a82411fa8bcfe4469ca0bcf7d63e210c.png
Comment:
  Thread for requesting anything from sauce to recommendations to whatever the fuck you wants faggots.<br />SFW and NSFW I don&#39;t care.<br /><br />I&#39;ll start, requesting sauce for this pic.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4804'>&gt;&gt;4804</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; I can&#39;t post whatever I want faggot.</span><br />I can post whatever I want faggot.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4804'>&gt;&gt;4804</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I like to suck cock and there&#39;s nothing you can do to stop me.</span><br />Hot.<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10479'>&gt;&gt;10479</a><br />orbot is utter shit, the only reasonably way to browse on android is connecting icecat with termux&#39;s tor, &quot;smart&quot; phones have to be burnt in hell anyway


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: 2f7374a16498739fdd52e20078bd5d2addd0764f0f60b47b0fc97ee1d3b51eb2.pdf
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8069'>&gt;&gt;8069</a><br />I had intended my conclusion to be true for every species, and in fact to make positive claims for how humanity should evolve.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post8071'>&gt;&gt;8071</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;instincts, feelings</span><br />your instincts are produced by evolution. You don&#39;t see the logic, but the logic is going on behind the scenes.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I would love to hear the &#39;evolutionary reasoning&#39; for where exactly do you draw that line.</span><br />I&#39;m sure such a thing exists, but I don&#39;t know where it is. The other issues you mention we typically argue for based on reflexive logic, as with murder. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;we can see different moral codes across as little as different cultures</span><br />There&#39;s an appendix in pdf related demonstrating the consistency between world cultures on moral issues. Lewis&#39; essay is very much an inspiration regarding these issues. See in particular his conclusion regarding &quot;seeing through&quot; things. 


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8078'>&gt;&gt;8078</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I had intended my conclusion to be true for every species, and in fact to make positive claims for how humanity should evolve. </span><br />Your words make less and less sense.<br />Make an explicit point then.<br /><br />Meanwhile I&#39;ll add some side notes about evolution.<br />Making the &quot;evolution&quot; some divine force behind the creation, behind the laws and behind how things &quot;should be&quot; doesn&#39;t do you any favors, because evolution remains some rather abstract idea expressing itself in some system of changing generations with some feedback loops. That means changing the environment results in different outputs, changing the generation mechanism results in different outputs or, at most, changing nature laws results in different outputs. In that regard the phrase &quot;should evolve&quot; is absurd.<br />I dare to say that your thinking is too anthropocentric for a matter like this.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;There&#39;s an appendix in pdf related demonstrating the consistency between world cultures on moral issues.</span><br />Those cultures all belong to the class of so-called agrarian civilizations. The way they operate is tightly defined and they depend on a fairly large amounts of population living on some fertile land.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;<span class='kiketext'>(((femnism)))</span></span><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;<span class='kiketext'>(((democracy)))</span></span>


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: 95f448990ca9495ba5e3fd64ce20776dcb8239c7732e775e6c325226613dbc4e.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post3095'>&gt;&gt;3095</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You should fully close Tor Browser and reopen it instead.</span><br />It is visible every time you close and then reopen Tor Browser like this. A smart adversary may be able to identify that you are intentionally trying to change circuits by opening/closing the browser.<br />It makes more sense to rely on the new identity button, or sending a SIGHUP signal to the tor process.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10484'>&gt;&gt;10484</a><br />Sometimes I worry about the guard node for such reasons. It makes me feel paranoid.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post3095'>&gt;&gt;3095</a><br />I noticed in Firefox that when you set it to never remember history, it hides all the cookies from you. The cookies still exist in memory but you can&#39;t see them and neither can extensions.<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18302'>&gt;&gt;18302</a> <br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Race is social as well.</span><br />Dude, I respect you and enjoy our conversation, and this wouldn&#39;t happen, if you were able to believe shit like that.<br />I won&#39;t refute you, because neither you not I nor anyone who reads here believes that.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;My take on this is that cities are not for living, they are for making money. An awful lot of people live there though.</span><br />There have been cities and citystates in the past, which did not vanish over a few generations. Of course, people moved there, but as far as I&#39;m aware people 100 years ago were above replacement-level even in cities. But taxes were lower and women had fewer rights, so it was easier to start a family, and harder for women to fuck up their life.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Unabomber makes an explicit point that you cannot separate the good parts of tech from the bad parts.</span><br />The unabomber explicitly wants to destroy large-scale technology, because it dominates society, but is rather restrained when it comes to small-scale technology. He makes a distinction in that regard. What he meant by &quot;you can&#39;t separate good tech from bad tech&quot; is, that if you have a global telephone net, you&#39;ll have a unified police force, that hunts you worldwide. You can&#39;t easily talk to your distant family in shitholistan without also enabling the police to talk to the police in shitholistan.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;and you have to pick between space and anarchism</span><br />I&#39;m not sure, whether space exploration has to be done by nations. I think, that it may be possible to achieve that by private means, if taxes would go down to something near 0%, as people would do or finance shit they find to be important, if it&#39;s clear, that the state won&#39;t do it. It may actually be the case, that AnCapistan would have a better chance of reaching space than nationstates. But I&#39;m inconclusive here. In any case, I&#39;m working in a technological field Ted bombed, and even I think, that the technological routes we go down are too centralized. Where I&#39;m living everyone basically is forced to have a bank account, which is THE technological means of controlling the finances of the population. I&#39;d prefer using cash locally, and something like monero for money transfers over distances, even though moneros are more high-tech than banking is. I do believe, that the unabomber would come to the same conclusion, and in similar cases would prefer a decentralized and uncontrollable high-tech route over the centralized and controllable low-tech-route.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Also I don&#39;t think your estimate of middle age technology is right.</span><br />After the roman empire there were several technological breakthroughs, which made slavery obsolete, while during roman times the amount of slaves you owned basically determined your social status. Rome stagnated as a result of it, as technology, that made slavery obsolete, was held back. I&#39;m talking about simple stuff like windmills, watermills, or harnesses that don&#39;t choke farming animals. With those things the early middle ages ourperformed roman food production. You may think, that rome was better due to the aqueducts or the circus maximus, but those were just low-tech things done on a large scale, that would have been impossible without slavery and a severe lack of freedom on the side of the population.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;As much as I am aware, the West HAS TO butt into everyone&#39;s business</span><br />I wouldn&#39;t consider trade as someone forcing his will upon someone else, but as an voluntary exchange. I&#39;m aware, that that&#39;s not what the west does, and I think, that this imperialism is one of the problems of the west, which make corrections necessary.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;You still have to make a point that your way of playing a hand is optimal lol.</span><br />I think, that I made the point, that my way of playing my hand is MORE optimal than the alternatives, which is why it&#39;s the best way available. &quot;Optimal&quot; is impossible until our robotic overlords outperform our brains, and probably not even then. I believe, that the way I&#39;ve described also leads to a more or less stable equilibrium, which can be uphold permanently, while interventionism appears to be more of a slippery slope, which enables you to buy security in the present for the price of inevitable large and violent corrections in the future. So I&#39;d argue, that over the long term, my approach will lead to the least amount of engineers getting stabbed for no reason, and the fewest workers revolting. Suppressing those things only leads to a built-up of pressure, which is going to destabilize the whole system in the long run.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I&#39;m fine with your expectations growing ever less realistic, but you shouldn&#39;t be fine with that.</span><br />I&#39;ve been in a few countries with a high rate of gun control, and also in countries, where many people had full-auto-rifles in their attic. The latter ones are considerably more friendly in their daily intercourse, while the former ones had lots of places which I wouldn&#39;t visit after dark. &quot;Friendliness&quot; is a subjective term, but it&#39;s very noticeable for everyone I&#39;ve ever talked to, who made that experience. If you want to analyze the situation based upon data, you could compare the crime-rate between US-states sorted by the rate of gun-ownership, or between switzerland, liechtenstein, and germany. The people are culturally and genetically very similar, but violent crimes tend to happen more often, if firearms are hard to obtain and prohibited to carry. What more evidence do you need, to conclude, that more weapons, which in turn enable deadly self-defense, result in a more peaceful society?<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;The point wasn&#39;t about your likes.</span><br />If it wasn&#39;t about my likes, I don&#39;t see any point at all. Do you want to argue, that I shall bow to the wishes of some STD-vectors, cuz they&#39;re cozy?<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Wars are win and lost. The losers get their points and ideas all twisted, they get blamed for everything, and their future possible followers, if happen at all, have a much harder time. Don&#39;t fight a war you cannot win if you care about heritage.</span><br />That&#39;s a new development based on <span class='kiketext'>(((media control)))</span>. In the past lots of wars were fought without all this modern bullshit. However, if you&#39;d have been in europe, you may have noticed, that today you don&#39;t even have to lose a war, to experience all the manifestations of a lost war. Germany has it bad, psychologically speaking, but great britain isn&#39;t off any better, even though the latter won WW2.<br /><br />So I&#39;d argue, that it may not even matter, whether you win or lose, and not fighting at all may lead to the same result as losing does. Not being able to fight a war likely leads to a similar result as losing does.<br /><br />Doesn&#39;t &quot;fighting&quot; look like the best option under those conditions?<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Decentralization is pretty much suboptimal.</span><br />Compared to what? <br />Free markets are decentralized, and perform better than socialism. But even the most passionate AnCap is going to agree, that even the freest market still runs suboptimal. There&#39;s only nothing better available. You can&#39;t plan an economy better than the free market does.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10469'>&gt;&gt;10469</a><br />This link is botnet.<br />I didn&#39;t open this thread and my browser went there anyway. WTF OP


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: f8a823a5b038a7a8db919a5e64a77f2f29a56b04e4b0cfd89c85e613895d4c5f.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4787'>&gt;&gt;4787</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;How to stop masturbating</span><br />like this


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4447'>&gt;&gt;4447</a><br />death threat. illegal under US law. reported


Board: v
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Portal 2 is probably my most favorite game ever. Its a shame it has about 0 replay value. <br />Still it was about the most fun ive ever had playing a game. The puzzles are genius and just-hard-enough, but not trough obfuscation (which is a trap a lot of puzzle game fall into), but because of being genuinely creative. The broken down facility atmosphere is great, especially in the top levels that are grown through by weeds and whatnot.<br />Also theres portals in it. Such a great concept, i wonder why nobody copied it yet. <br /><br />Im also a big fan of oxygen not included, but the game is shittily coded - From the moment you start a new game, your framerate is steadily dropping as your base increases in complexity, until you realize at one point that its not playable anymore. So i always get excited about all the updates that piled up while ive let i lay since the last time, play it for a while and then get salty about having to end it prematurely. <br />Idk why did they decide to do it in fucking unity of all things, with its shitty multicore support etc.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4808'>&gt;&gt;4808</a><br />thats one roasty pussy let me tell you that


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a rel='noreferrer' href='http://whitehonor.com/book-downloads/'>http://whitehonor.com/book-downloads/</a>


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
File: a3c9b7bc5306779fa867b0e8c7feb576f383067e61e4b496f99edb17f0b720d0.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18314'>&gt;&gt;18314</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; I won&#39;t refute you, because neither you not I nor anyone who reads here believes that. </span><br />KYAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA<br />AHAHAHAHAHA<br />Sorry.<br />Well.<br />Race is social pretty much by definition as a body of people. Genetic traits might very well influence some of the social traits. The current circumstances, as well as the culture, determine how a race will behave. Social interactions with other races also influence that.<br />You won&#39;t refute me? Because you can&#39;t.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;There have been cities and citystates in the past, which did not vanish over a few generations. Of course, people moved there, but as far as I&#39;m aware people 100 years ago</span><br />Other factors would be industrialization, child labor laws, also you didn&#39;t account for the scale of urbanization back then. Basically nowadays cities are horrendous monsters, and everybody wants to have some business there.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;But taxes were lower</span><br />The point about money is not to have a lot but to have enough. Compared to modern people, countryfolk of the 19th century was poor as shit struggling to make ends meet unless they had a lot of land and workers for themselves.<br />In a country you also need less literal money to raise kids, you basically live off the land. In a city you have to pay.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;women had fewer rights</span><br />If some women are crazy not all of them are. Having multiple partners before &quot;settling down&quot; with a &quot;beta provider&quot; is basically the sweetest deal for them.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;He makes a distinction in that regard.</span><br />He does but you don&#39;t refute the point. Reread that part of the manifesto about good parts and bad parts until you see it. I have nothing else to add.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I think, that the technological routes we go down are too centralized</span><br />Think what you want lol. Your opinion.<br />Anyway Tolkien, the man himself, has written that the One Ring wants only one Lord and is basically evil, but it&#39;s so much easier to manage one entity instead of many. Obviously there are dangers in centralization, like, if we take out the center, we largely undermine the whole system, but what we want depends on our immediate tasks, I suppose. There are merits in decentralized systems too.<br />I just want to say there is time to cast away stones and time to gather stones together.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;several technological breakthroughs, which made slavery obsolete</span><br />No they d&#39;int! :P<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;With those things the early middle ages ourperformed roman food production.</span><br />Rome wasn&#39;t ruined because of starvation, you know.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;those were just low-tech things done on a large scale</span><br />&quot;Large scale&quot; by itself implies &quot;hi&quot; technological thinking, as it solves the problems that never arise on the low scale.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;slavery and a severe lack of freedom on the side of the population</span><br />That Rome was.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;medieval tech superior</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;The Early Middle Ages saw a continuation of trends evident since late classical antiquity, including population decline, especially in urban centres, a decline of trade, a small rise in global warming (wtf lol) and increased migration. In the 19th century the Early Middle Ages were often labelled the &quot;Dark Ages&quot;, a characterization based on the relative scarcity of literary and cultural output from this time.</span><br /><span class='pinktext'>&lt;European technical advancements from the 12th to 14th centuries were either built on long-established techniques in medieval Europe, originating from Roman and Byzantine antecedents, or adapted from cross-cultural exchanges through trading networks with the Islamic world, China, and India.</span><br />ok dude<br />The watermills are probably the most impressive out of those. And all of this can hardly be considered any more &quot;hi tech&quot; than Roman tech. The Islamic world and China did much more than yuropeen barbarians during that time it&#39;s not even funny.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I believe, that the way I&#39;ve described also leads to a more or less stable equilibrium</span><br />I don&#39;t care about your beliefs dude. Make a convincing point.<br />I, for one, believe that such an equilibrium, if achievable, will reduce the current population numbers and will likely make &quot;engineers&quot; obsolete as people go away to form ancap shitholes or some shit. Or maybe I don&#39;t believe that. I am not a believer.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What more evidence do you need, to conclude, that more weapons, which in turn enable deadly self-defense, result in a more peaceful society?</span><br />What we can do is to throw random data proving our points at each other. Look at this<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/right-to-carry-gun-violence/531297/'>https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/right-to-carry-gun-violence/531297/</a><br />Read his points carefully.<br />The point of &quot;what if he has a gun? better fuck off&quot; isn&#39;t convincing at all if you try to make &quot;it&#39;s best for everybody&quot; point.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;If it wasn&#39;t about my likes, I don&#39;t see any point at all.</span><br />You either do want the &quot;best outcome for everybody&quot; or you don&#39;t lol. &quot;Hey guys let&#39;s arm ourselves it&#39;s for your sake!!&quot; and &quot;no? well, fuck you then&quot; don&#39;t mount. xD<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;That&#39;s a new development based on</span><br />You fail to make a point pal. Also it wasn&#39;t about external enemies, but about internal as well. Revolts and civil war losers have been stomped in various tales as well. You know more or less neutral point of view because there has been a lot of historians revealing the shit.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;great britain isn&#39;t off any better</span><br />Great Britain lost a bigger game and fell from a higher place tbh. There was never a power more strong than Great Britain in the whole world. *proceeds speaking English as a second language*<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt; So I&#39;d argue, that it may not even matter, whether you win or lose, and not fighting at all may lead to the same result as losing does. Not being able to fight a war likely leads to a similar result as losing does.</span><br />I wasn&#39;t making a point of not fighting ever.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Compared to what? </span><br />Compared to some degree of centralization. Even federated nations today have, you know, FEDERAL government and conventions between subjects so they can communicate and function more efficiently. I&#39;d argue even that &quot;completely decentralized&quot; DHT for torrents is somewhat centralized by the virtue of torrent clients having hardcoded bootstrapping nodes so DHT swarm doesn&#39;t fall apart.<br />Heck, people flock to the cities because of all the possibilities they provide, and cities are pretty much &quot;people hubs&quot;. Centralization simplifies shit greatly, and simple means easier, and easier means less energy wasted, and that means some definition of optimal, lol. Like, with torrents you have to spend much less time looking shit up on DHT if you have a tracker with a torrent alive with peers over there.<br />Of course, as said before, there are downsides to that.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Free markets</span><br />Free markets don&#39;t exist. Fair competition doesn&#39;t exist. Next question.<br />Oh wait, it&#39;s the end of your post lol.<br /><br />Overall I think the conversation comes to a halt. I&#39;d say I can respect your point of view more like a life position and a sincere action maybe, but not due to your knowledge or because you come to some valid conclusions. Because you don&#39;t.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Nicotine does this to nonsmokers<br />Dont start smoking, fren, its a bad habit. Stop while you still can. This here what you are describing sounds like your nicotine tolerance is very low so i recommend you take the intelligent choice and not increase it.


Board: v
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Rimworld is the most comfy game I&#39;ve ever played. I love it. How your pawns interract with eachother just puts a smile on my face. 10/10


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  If you want to inhale smoke, why don&#39;t you move to India or China?<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;What causing this?</span><br />Smoking.


Board: v
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post1396'>&gt;&gt;1396</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Portal 2 has zero replay value</span><br />There are both single and multiplayer custom maps<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;do it in unity of all things</span><br />Portal 2 was made in the source engine. Maybe you are thinking of The Lab?


Board: l
Name: get rekt niggers
Comment:
  i post on darkwebchan, it&#39;s only accessible via recommendation from other users and has a secret password. 


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4813'>&gt;&gt;4813</a><br />What this anon said.<br />This is an effect of nicotine and high concentration of carbon monoxide and dioxide in your lungs. <br />For specific effects of nicotine refer to pharmacodynamics on wikipedia article (basically dopamine agonist and acetylcholine receptor agonist).<br /><br />I smoke for some years now and I too don&#39;t recommend you start with it. At first you will get some good effects (and there&#39;s many). But smoking cigarretes has many side effects. The most noticiable one is anxiety (not of the good kind). You can expect other side effects too, not just dizzyness, such as your eye movement will be disturbed a little, heavier breathing and obsessive thoughts/memories.<br />If you want to start smoking for the cognitive/memory benefits of nicotine (this was my goal when I started, now I&#39;m addicted, hence why I don&#39;t recommend to others), you should buy something like VapourGenie and good tobacco with no heavy use of pesticides/herbicides in it&#39;s cultivation (the specie N.rustica has much more nicotine, btw).


Board: v
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post1398'>&gt;&gt;1398</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;custom maps</span><br />You need the steam botnet for that<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;unity</span><br />Your reading comprehensions sucks mate


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18316'>&gt;&gt;18316</a><br />Ooooh you must be so special that you have access there


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post7779'>&gt;&gt;7779</a> <a class='reference' href='#post7780'>&gt;&gt;7780</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;So everytime you change or add a page you have to regenerate every single page from scratch?</span><br /><br />New update! (v0.2):<br /><a rel='noreferrer' href='https://myanee7lkwzxkhupjxvu2sxtkuf57lkvr3wutf3vfvnhkxuei7h3xbad.onion/boot/index.html'>https://myanee7lkwzxkhupjxvu2sxtkuf57lkvr3wutf3vfvnhkxuei7h3xbad.onion/boot/index.html</a><br /><br />It can now alphabetize and append to an existing directory.html, or rewrite it, plus it can do links and stuff.  Check the &quot;--help&quot; for how to do what in terms of command line args.<br />Check the sources on the site for the rest.<br /><br />Plenty of things to add though, such as what <a class='reference' href='#post7781'>&gt;&gt;7781</a> suggested.<br />Also tables, image links, and changing the index.html file&#39;s name maybe.<br />But it makes writing HTML5 a little faster if nothing else.<br /><br />Let me know what you think about v2 nanons!  And tell me if you find any bugs.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18310'>&gt;&gt;18310</a><br />What is &quot;c00l&quot; about that site?<br />People should describe what site they are linking to, clicking on random onion links seems sketchy.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post13978'>&gt;&gt;13978</a> <a class='reference' href='#post18318'>&gt;&gt;18318</a><br />What, is the review inspector coming and they are gonna rate us on how good the top threads are?  wtf


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18146'>&gt;&gt;18146</a><br />What about PolitiScales or iSideWith though?


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8079'>&gt;&gt;8079</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Make an explicit point then</span><br />How about this:<br />Morality is universal, and independent of environment or evolutionary history. All sufficiently intelligent species, in this universe or others, will converge on the same moral principles. This is obvious in the case of murder, and similarly obvious for many of the principles in that appendix. Duty to posterity trivially falls out of evolution. Intelligent species rely heavily on inter-generational knowledge transfer, so duty to the elderly is also obvious. I could do an account for any of the principles there with similar ease as well. By creating such accounts, we are able to answer hard questions of morality, as we did with abortion. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Making the &quot;evolution&quot; some divine force behind the creation</span><br />Evolution is a hill climbing algorithm, which abuses heavy parallelism and meta-parameterization to find the highest possible peaks in a landscape. While I give much ado to the process, clearly what matters is finding those highest peaks. But evolution is a monte-carlo process, so any peak it is incapable of finding is not a peak at all. I try to use rational thinking to find these peaks without using a stochastic process, but when challenged I need to reference a process guranteed to find the highest peak (eventually) in my defence. <br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;changing nature laws results in different outputs</span><br />For body shape and so on it might, but for morality it doesn&#39;t, and I submit that this shouldn&#39;t be surprising. Humans are extreme generalist, being able to adapt to any scenario, being intelligent enough to think up new strategies in new environments. So, genetically indistinguishable humans make their way in the coldest climates on earth and the hottest ones. Given enough intelligence, the environment becomes a mere stratum, rather than a defining feature. Look at modern environment control: I have a dial with which I can choose the temperature and humidity of my house! On the order of 99.9% of people nowadays do jobs besides farming, and therefore would keep a nearly identical job if the mode of food production drastically changed. The vast majority of people could pick up and move to a new planet, and if such things made sense, to a new universe, with no genetic change. This is all possible due to our extreme intelligence. Why then is it so surprising that the societies of some intelligent alien race would be similarly indifferent to environment?<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I dare to say that your thinking is too anthropocentric for a matter like this.</span><br />You seem more interested in testable claims, which can only be made for humans. I could make more rational claims, with some conclusion that only applies to humans, but premises that apply to other earth species, if you think this would be less anthro-centric.<br />But morality relies heavily on delayed reward and cooperation, something stupider animals, and even many humans, are incapable of doing. Asking whether animals follow moral laws is therefore a moot point.<br /><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Those cultures all belong to the class of so-called agrarian civilizations.</span><br />That agrarian civilizations are over-represented is because they are the only ones successful enough to have developed written language. Nevertheless, there are choice references to hunter gatherer societies, derived from recent recordings of oral traditions (look for &#39;redskin&#39; or &#39;australian aborigines&#39;). 


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <span class='greentext'>&gt;morality</span><br />Yo im jumpin in wit out any knowing of what&#39;s really going on in this discussion other than to say:<br />Moralism is dumb!<br />You should choose practicality and arrive at the same conclusions.<br />If you don&#39;t, your thought process was based on &quot;muh feelz&quot; and shiet.<br />Allowing murder, for example, is not practical.<br />Wow, a conclusion made without using morality!<br />But someone&#39;s &quot;moralism&quot; dictates we cannot vaccinate for preventable disease!<br />Just two examples.  


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  TinEye can and, hate to say it, but and Google Images can be very useful for doing a reverse image search.


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8049'>&gt;&gt;8049</a><br />A: Because they are <span class='kiketext'>(((subverters)))</span>.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Boards should use a common protocol, analogous to email, allowing everyone to use a 3rd party client to read and post on any board. There can then be many clients developed independently of the popularity of this or that board. The program can support some basic ranking schemes, and also allow the user to develop his own ranking algorithm easily (without having to code all the UI and web parsing). Even something like a basic spam filter, but detect good messages instead of bad, will probably produce very impressive results. The problem right now is that all sites want to hold their audience captive, and want to control how they use their site through closed-source, proprietary web-software like js.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18324'>&gt;&gt;18324</a><br />Oh its the js-bad-all-webpages-should-be-apps nigger<br />Missed you


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18320'>&gt;&gt;18320</a><br />The comment was made just after the 8ch fatallity, this place were full of retards. Putting better threads on top help minimize the monkey behaviour.<br />Would you like to enter an imageboard with desktop/smartphone threads or into something with rational and meaningful discussions? If you pick the first option, 4chan is your home.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4809'>&gt;&gt;4809</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;death threat</span><br />This is a love thread on a board of peace.<br />


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18326'>&gt;&gt;18326</a><br />Beware those who preach quality while antagonizing newcomers, for they are subversive Jews tasked with killing the community.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post368'>&gt;&gt;368</a> <br /><br />Most if not all  gun shops online are police hotspots, even if you do manage to find one thats legit you would still need to get a fuckton of bitcoins and make sure you dont get caught shipping an illegal gun to your house.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18328'>&gt;&gt;18328</a><br />You don&#39;t deserve to view the web if you can&#39;t code your own browser, you don&#39;t deserve to eat food if you can&#39;t manage your own farm, you don&#39;t deserve to spend money if you can&#39;t own your own bank, you don&#39;t deserve to drive if you can&#39;t build your own car........


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10489'>&gt;&gt;10489</a><br />Cyanofag is that you. I cum here especially to read your posts.<br /> <br />What detail are you bumping,. what specifically do you want to discuss?<br /><br />your original post was light on detail and tbh you are asking a lot from 5 nanons and a bunch of fucktard refugees.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4798'>&gt;&gt;4798</a><br />nofap is for plebs.  noair is the final solution<br />


Board: pol
Name: Nanonymous
File: ea5a8777dfbaa8f7f1c53c3d334be18e720474bec7bf1a2d82f99247aa53819e.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post8082'>&gt;&gt;8082</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;All sufficiently intelligent species</span><br />One point is intelligence is hard to describe in terms of evolution and in some ways counter-evolutionary.<br />The other point is &quot;evolutionary history&quot; may never bring the &quot;intelligent species&quot; on board.<br />Overall this makes a point of morality being universal rather doubtful, because it might not exist objectively.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;in this universe or others</span><br />Consider a universe where death doesn&#39;t exist.<br />Consider species at which death means something different from what it means for us, like they immediately get revived from their most recent signal. I suppose eradication of the revival mechanism would count as murder but it might be impossible for an individual and regardless it will bring about different morality rules.<br />I dunno, consider species so stupidly fertile they shit out 10 kids per second and you don&#39;t have to care about them at all as they are immediately self-sufficient though tiny and underdeveloped.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Evolution is a hill climbing algorithm, which abuses heavy parallelism and meta-parameterization to find the highest possible peaks in a landscape.</span><br />I think evolution is about finding the lowest &quot;peaks&quot; possible, since everybody below some threshold gets a pass. It&#39;s impossible to claim it is &quot;aimed for the top&quot; unless these &quot;tops&quot; are sinking into the &quot;sea&quot;, which would make the whole process have no point and it looks like out of scope of evolution anyway.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;clearly what matters is finding those highest peaks</span><br />It matters to you, not to the evolution.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;Humans are extreme generalist, being able to adapt to any scenario</span><br />Humans are much more fragile than you make them out to be. That whole paragraph is a huge demonstration of anthropocentric thinking. I don&#39;t know, but one could assume that carbon-based life could be impossible in some other universe. Likewise, there are limits to technology and to inventiveness of humans.<br />Also, with that kind of thinking you actually want to freeze the evolution in place, so the whole morality argument becomes less evolutionary at all.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;I could make more rational claims, with some conclusion that only applies to humans, but premises that apply to other earth species</span><br />Just stick with your plan: &quot;morality is universal&quot;. If you cannot support that, make some lesser claim, it&#39;s still interesting to see how far we can stretch this.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;But morality relies heavily on delayed reward and cooperation, something stupider animals, and even many humans, are incapable of doing. Asking whether animals follow moral laws is therefore a moot point.</span><br />That&#39;s pretty much accepting morality is a product of rational thinking of an individual exposed to group relations, therefore it can be as &quot;arbitrary and random&quot; as we can imagine.<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;(look for &#39;redskin&#39; or &#39;australian aborigines&#39;).</span><br />These look like some chosen records.<br />My knowledge of American Indians and abos is that their societies were pretty brutal. They might feel bad about doing some of the shit, but those were the rules nonetheless: abandoning sick, abandoning elderly, abandoning children at tough times.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10490'>&gt;&gt;10490</a><br />Idk. Just wanted more people to know about this stuff. Maybe disagree on something I&#39;ve said. Or try to improve the ideas.<br />I find this subject (self-sufficiency and plant/fungi/cyanob.) highly important in many ways. Not just in the practical sense, but also because they are like engineering &quot;games&quot;, where you try to solve each problem and improve the whole system with new ideas and methods to increase overall efficiency.<br />I keep comming back to these threads from time to time and I think they have the potential to &quot;introduce&quot; people to new areas of knowledge. I for sure were influenced by many anons on other imageboards exactly because of this same reason, some random guy publishing his research on some thread. Hopefully the 5 anons here find some of it useful.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4818'>&gt;&gt;4818</a><br />nonano is the ultimate challenge 12 out of 12 nanons cannot complete it


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10491'>&gt;&gt;10491</a> (me)<br />To be more specific, I wanted to cover the basics of (modern) human needs. That is: shelter, hygiene, water, nutrition and electricity.<br />For the nutrition part, I&#39;ve proposed fermented spirulina and maitake, because they are easy to cultivate and are (mostly) nutritionally complete. I&#39;m not proposing we should be eating just that for the rest of our lifes, btw. I just wanted to create ways to not need to worry so much about the basics of human living.<br />For water I&#39;ve proposed rain harvesting. For electricity, solar panels. For hygiene, contained based sanitation and homemade soap. For shelter, underground shipping containers or surface geodesic domes.<br />How can we improve that, in terms of time consumption, resources, money costs, low maintainance, etc? Those are my questions. I see many problems with the solutions I&#39;ve come up with, but overall these are the best I could find. And, as I&#39;ve said, think of this as an engineering game, it&#39;s fun (at least for me, as it keeps me reading and learning new stuff).


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  Great! Now I can increase my soy consumption tenfold, and only barely control it with a webshit User Interference.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4714'>&gt;&gt;4714</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;python</span><br />lol. imagine using EAFP to make food that will kill you if you get it wrong


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Email: sage
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10493'>&gt;&gt;10493</a><br />The purpose is exactly the opposite. Wouldn&#39;t you like to see where your food comes from? If you cultivate yourself, you have that control.<br />You talk about &quot;soy&quot;, but it&#39;s not like meat is immune to modern hazards. Cows eat bad grains their whole lifes and they inject antibiotics on them, just so you can buy it on the market and consume those by-products yourself.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: ad315d12c349f1dcb83a32e534ef5f14c8274da2f143de2d97f5c56243441ba2.jpg
Comment:
  Normalfags at 36c3.<br />The convention used to be about something but now it&#39;s about tech illiterate /g/tard/plebbit normalfags spouting memes.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: 4f5dafb5acbf8b24b99e8d29dab213636c4743e15eeddd2b4904650211232391.png
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10496'>&gt;&gt;10496</a><br />Use <a rel='noreferrer' href='http://anidb.net/'>http://anidb.net/</a> faggot.


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post10498'>&gt;&gt;10498</a><br />i dont use either, i just came across the site from a search


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4828'>&gt;&gt;4828</a><br />Hapa girlfriends are more submissive than white girlfriends, and they always swallow.<br />Get a hapa gf, OP.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: 40b2ef196b483973baa76604df797f366b4e860ad83d6539f83af1cf95051172.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4828'>&gt;&gt;4828</a><br />Don&#39;t ask for medical advice on the internet fren, if your gf has difficulty swallowing she should go to a doctor immediately.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4829'>&gt;&gt;4829</a><br />Can I get a free hapa gf as a sample to test this statement on?<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4830'>&gt;&gt;4830</a><br />Sorry umarufren if I gave the impression my gf had life endangering problems, what my gf has problem with is swallowing human semen and the problem seems to be mostly psychological. Since human semen is not necessary for her survival medical intervention or advice is not necessary for now.


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: b5c52d3d6aab6bca710789737afc8ba07e582c9b242a3720d24ec50ef3e30069.jpg
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4832'>&gt;&gt;4832</a><br /><a class='reference' href='#post4833'>&gt;&gt;4833</a><br /><i>Perverts.</i><br />


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4815'>&gt;&gt;4815</a><br />Also what the fags in SF do is just buy nicotine gum as use it when they plan to mull over something.


Board: l
Name: Nanonymous
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post18233'>&gt;&gt;18233</a><br />Reddit doesn&#39;t actually work like that anymore. The whole system is a facade and they shadowban threads and remove upvotes with impunity. Same with Youtube, Twitter, etc.<br /><br /><a class='reference' href='#post18325'>&gt;&gt;18325</a><br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;protocols are &quot;&quot;&quot;apps&quot;&quot;&quot;</span><br />naisu b8


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: f6fdaf659405a8dcc66d9399373bc188f54c12c2b8d382bff77b85144a63b019.jpg
Comment:
  This is a dicksuckingly tasteless thread but I still feel it&#39;s my duty to help OP. Cummyfren, women in general are impervious to manlogic and manbegging, we all know that. So have you tried brute force, holding her head down and like such as?<br />


Board: g
Name: Nanonymous
File: d0e285d743be52f108a6f42114ea666b4171f5d1ef1f118b2a9551735de51cdc.jpg
Comment:
  Steam is one of the most cancerous things to happen to computing. For starters the GUI was a slow, unresponsive piece of horse shit since the early 2000s and continues to be so. I have no idea why anyone would have wanted to integrate such an unusable piece of shit into their own product back when Steam wasn&#39;t even popular enough to matter. It also brings webshit into your game which would have potentially been a real product otherwise. And why the fuck do you want people to be able to steal your single player games?<br />Also <a rel='noreferrer' href='https://8kun.top/techbunker/res/304.html#q668'>https://8kun.top/techbunker/res/304.html#q668</a>


Board: b
Name: Nanonymous
File: d73dd2e6133ee2969c60b9a45f6b7d108ad8cb06d98fce2a22c2a5eb137d0160.gif
Comment:
  <a class='reference' href='#post4837'>&gt;&gt;4837</a><br />I swallowed yo mama last night faggot.<br /><a class='reference' href='#post4840'>&gt;&gt;4840</a><br />I tried, she spitted it out and complained. I could force her to swallow with brute force but I don&#39;t want to get to that point.<br />Is there a way to convince her to do it? Do your gfs swallow nanons? Do you swallow nanonettes?<br /><span class='greentext'>&gt;women in general are impervious to manlogic and manbegging</span><br />There are very susceptible to external inputs and validation though, maybe if I make her watch cum swallow porn I can rewire her brain idk.


