>>34181
Staff might be a stretch, I haven't seen anything like that before (maybe those asian sword-breakers but those have very different proportions). Anchor might be something else but it would have been super clever if it were to act as a replacement for a bow. Then also boot colour might be explained differently. Now I looked at the logo of the organisation there are 4 colours in it - red, blue, yellow and green, just like in Windows logo and in this occult schematic. I know what's the deal with red+white+black but never figured out the red+blue+green+yellow. Those are admittedly questionable. As for the rest I don't think it's a stretch at all.

For example I could understand a dove or an angel but what does a dog have to do with Christianity? In the NT period "dog" was used to pejoratively refer to a male prostitute, if I remember correctly.

Now why would an institution that aims to be seen as good use symbolism with negative connotations? Depends on how deep you want to get into it. Why would Paul VI Audience Building bear an unmistakable resemblance to a serpent? I could tell you that's because they're wolves in sheep clothing but explaining why and how exactly would take time. Long story short is that Catholicism is Christianity mixed with Mithraism, and possibly some other Mystery Religions. But whatever the reasons are - it is happening. It's blatant if you know where to look. Although it would never occur to most people that this might even be the case so they're not recognizing it even when they see it.

One example of "why" is in "ben garrison.webm". In case of what happened in that video it was done for the lulz at most but it doesn't have to be. Simplest functionality I can imagine it provides is letting the other people on the gig know that you are also on the gig. There are more levels on which the question "why" can be answered but again - it takes time and some of those I heard I'm not fully certain about myself.