>>536
>>537
> the evidence is there in what I have posted
No, it's not actually. All you've posted proof of is that someone on that forum was using the word "storm." You provided no proof that the plans laid out by Q were discussed there. Yes, Q is almost certainly a LARP. But, your particular alternative explanation is entirely lacking in sufficient evidence to be taken seriously.
> The html files have a lot of trash replies also and those need to be removed as those garbage replies are very insulting and must not be shared with anyone.
Those are bullshit reasons. "Sorry, it's messy and I don't want to offend anyone."