>>14489
you thinking she 'looks' under 18 based on nothing isn't proof of anything. you don't know that she is underage in those pics and yet you state it like it's a fact, when in reality you have no clue how old she is in any of these pics and are just pulling shit out of your ass. probably the same retard who tries claiming every nude posted here is 'forbidden' even when we know for a fact they're 18+. stop projecting your pedrophilia and forbidden obsession onto everyone else. there is literally no reason to assume she's underage in those pics.