>>15304
>many anti-porn women think that men...
>In reality, it's moreso women who have these kinds of fantasies

do you have any statistics? otherwise it might very well seem that you guys are talking out of your asses, and we don't want that, do we?
that's why I'm not so enthustiastic about >>15299. it's very well written and convincing, the arguments are credible according to what we know about kennedi; yet, this kind of psychonalyzing is very susceptible of getting hijacked in a place like this, so it instantly becomes an excuse to thrash any feminist stance or any criticism of porn. but what affects the mind of one person cannot be used to automatically discredit a whole set of ideas. no matter how sophisticated your arguments are, if in the end you resort to this kind of lazy generalization what you're saying turns out to be very dumb or dishonest.