>>17167
as one of the autistic theorycels from the ken thread, this is such a painfully obvious misreading of that book. why is a tradcath also trying to larp like she would agree with anything whatsoever from what’s effectively a radical feminist leftcommunist takedown of both the patriarchy and bourgeois feminism and how both are internalized by everyone (it’s not just about women despite the name). it even rips religion a new one. did she even read it or just like the excerpts ken used to post on tumblr? and lol at “my bourgeois conquests” just immediately signals that book is not what she thinks it is about. what on earth.

of all people, why do so many girls either want to be or look up to this specific autistic communist radical feminist, even the girls who supposedly hate everything she stands for? will never understand this phenomenon. seems like these girls don’t think very hard.