>>41650
Yeah, it's clear that this post isn't being made in good faith and most of your statements are mischaracterizations and outright falsehoods, and that isn't a basis for a genuine discussion, which I don't believe you're interested in having in the first place, but I'll try to clear a few things up.
>He keeps creating discussions in every thread and then deletes posts from people who disagree with him
This isn't happening.
>like what just happened in Kaya's thread
Posters were told to stop explicit pedophilic discussion and to not make posts that could be interpreted as sexualizing persons underage, which the entire thread had devolved into by that point, requiring moderators to intervene, and posts engaging in such were deleted. Posters who continued to engage in such were and will be banned. This is the problem with these retards, they have no tact, they don't know when to stop, you give them an inch and they take a mile and they will keep pushing the limit, so it's necessary to crackdown before it gets out of hand. Posts of this nature add nothing of value to the board and will not be allowed here. We don't need posts about how 'breedable' some 14 year old is, we don't need posts about how the age of consent is only 13 in wherever-the-fuck, we don't need the "uh, being sexually attracted to 12 year olds isn't pedophilia," we don't need "if she bleeds shes ready to bleed" (actual quote from one of the deleted posts.) It fosters an element that we don't want here. This should not be a difficult concept to grasp. If you want to have in-depth discussions about how much you want to fuck kids go somewhere else.
>He is obviously the same person who whiteknights for and is obsessed with Ken and has a personal crusade against 'bert
Hilarious. And you are obviously the same person who whiteknights for Gilbert Raborg the Pedophile and spammed the link to his failed knock-off board here. If you have such an issue with the way this place is run maybe you and 'bert can go and suck each other off there.