>>46246
Read my post again. I used the term "real acceptance" to indicate what people want, to be accepted for who they really want. Furthermore, you're again using that putrid term of "flaws" to impose your emotions on others. Take for example 2 people who read books one reads 100 books a year, the other 1. Does reading 1 book/year makes you flawed? What about 50, or 10, or 5? At what point would you label your progeny a failure?

You missed my point on human capabilities, some are more capable than others but even the least capable is still human and needs to be accepted. Just because you accept someone doesn't mean you don't support them to become better. That's real acceptance. Also, people within the possibilities of their capabilities will interact with reality with different results. Two people doing the same thing will get treated differently, do you accept or blame others for that outcome?

It's you who has a shallow understanding of people and of acceptance, you just want to opportunistically be around some people while hypocritically asking others to see you in a certain. What's worse, you gave up on yourself and others, all you really want is to barter truth and delusion with other people.