>>68757
>The beauty of objects depends on the beholder

this is false, your opinion of the object's beauty is what's false, not the beauty itself, objective beauty can be clearly defined under various parameters and most people would agree what's aesthetically pleasing to human sensibilities versus what's offensive to the sensibilities, barring extreme mental illness

this kind of "everything is subjective and relative" mentality is the cancer of modernity, it isn't subjective, there are objective standards for morality and beauty and conduct, don't be naive buying into this "man is the measure of all things" hedonistic sophistry, it's bullshit and it makes you look dumb