>>16253
>moreso baffled a bit because I'm not even surprised
>I've spoke it in CLEAR English.
I don't even need to comment on those two sentences being next to each other, do I?

>Those WEG/WEP parodies
I have no idea what you're talking about. I was discussing the copyrighted IP you named in your original post.

>I already did proper research
So you researched the name, found out it was already regesterd by an existing network and thought "Fuck it, I'll use it anyway"? That doesn't make any sense Jordan.

>Not the intended shortened name "LTN"
Then why did you start the thread with that name and logo?