>>34527
not exactly
also i dont see how a 40 year old gets compared to me makes your point any 'valid'
>>34528
uh yeah because his font work doesnt suck
>some guy who gro-
no.
>and draws porn/fetish art of-
fictional characters, not "Children". i mean, i'd negver draw fucking issy simpson, right? THAT'S a child, not a stupid fictional robot cat