>>36142
posting a loli artist's work isn't evidence lmao
stop thinking about actual children
>>36152
So... none? Even if you are desperatelye comparing me to some non-existential mind, that.. still proves my point. There are no children under 18 thinking about these things, or even under 13. And ALSO desperately comparing them to "PDD", a disorder in which CHILDREN have trouble talking to others (until symptoms and stuff outgrow over time) doesn't work on me either.
I already had spoke to some strangers throughout my life even before I turned 18...
Therefore making your claims false. Someone with PDD wouldn't argue, a normal person who ISN'T pdd can. Alas, only for a few moments instead of every day. Bye bye. Don't reply again.