>>38691
It's actually perfect English, plus it was a justified reaction; you are disgusting.
>>38698
>b-b-b-big concepts are ha-
>spent all my night/day making a huge list of characters in upcoming universe of fiction. private of course.
>completing a few drawings and resuming some leftover project
>designed a logo that's actually good, even reminiscent of the early 90s.
You were saying? Lol. They are NOT hard to produce, or make. It's only "hard" if you deem it "hard".
>Good coun-
You've repeated the same 'allegations' countless of times, no one's buying them. Plus I heard from one of my actual mutuals, they had a past similar to this, but never wanted to do it again. Their name is Rob.
>that's the pr-
The problem is you thinking I would want to do that to a real person or "minor", I do not. Their FICTIONAL character isn't representation of their own self at all, you know. Fiction is already uncrossed.
The reality is that you need to get a grip and fuck off so you dont get fired from ur job. I wouldnt be surprised if anyone deemed you as crazy to handle a "job".
>than you are
Not into scat. Try again (you'll fail).
And bringing up people's kinks in arguments isn't really the best thing to do, and that's considered kinkshaming for most.
>p-parro-