>>16466
> and libs censor
... no but okay

> being pro censorship or sex work has nothing to do with communism
you're hearing what you want to hear. I said 'Literally a modern day embodiment of Western 'commies'. Can you comprehend that logic you autist?'
I was even kind enough to put 'commies' in inverted commas!

>you need to know your enemy
You read my sentence too literally. I don't mean she's a hardcore stalinist. I'm comparing her to those mutticans 'libtards' (with a lower case L) that call themselves 'commies'.

> liberal capitalists
literally what i said
>being more libertarian
>lies more right-wing because of her opinions on sex work being valid modes of capitalism

And I call her a 'commie' (referencing the libtard muttican version of 'communism') who love freedom but actually don't because they would adore the opportunity to control what you can and can't say (censorship).