>>4241
As you said: he cleaned all accounts related to him. If something wasn't found the first time around, it sure as hell is gone now. And it wouldn't just have to be some small detail about him, but actual criminal acts that would lead to an investigation.

>>4242
>There is nothing implicitly criminal in their chatlogs
I'm not completely sure if that is true. Wouldn't e.g. sexting or sending porn links to a minor qualify? Not that any of that by itself is enough for a serious conviction.
>they dont care about the social repercussion
Well, the ones who would have to care are the parents, but apparently they don't.