>>677
Good lad. Even if it's not going to torpedo seth once and for all, at least it will hopefully hurt him in some way.

>And I dont believe it's new info. At least not right now anyways. Its pretty much in the open for people to see.
Well, if we already know about it... sounds very cryptic though, especially the "at least not right now" part.
And you could say the "in the open for people to see" part about almost anything that can be found on the open web.