A hypothesis concerning Trump ##qMzbrH 01/11/2017 (Wed) 08:38:13 No. 35 del
The subject of this thread is bait. I have got a multilayered metaconspiracy hypothesis about Trump. It's so meta, it's not even about Trump per se, but how inaccurate and pathetic the consensus of speculative geopolitics is at guessing certain future events, the general "attention span" of remembering past events, the quality of the sources of information to retrieve data from, and how blaming a Jew is a counterargument to shut down the minds of critical analysis from transpiring. I will give a few scenarios and past examples, but I'm not going to "prove" my hypothesis.

Even before the beginnings of the Anonymous Imageboard, there were already Scholars, Hippies, NatSocs, Conspiracy Theorists, Christians, and of course, Jews and Spooks (government agencies) among them both, prior to and after Web 1.0 became available for middle class people with some money to purchase a Personal Computer and pay for a Dial-up connection. These old people oldfags have a firmer grasp on history, had more "attention span", but had less access to information. As time went by, more and more rabbit holes of disinformation and even misinformation came about, even unlearning their previously learned conspiracy theories to be replaced or improved with more information after it occured. Know that these old people oldfags were at least 21 through 50 years old before 9/11, held their beliefs prior to the internet and essentially didn't change much. These people are valuable sources of intel even if they're wrong about some things, they are justifiably wrong which is better than merely being wrong. Experience doesn't mean much of anything, but these people know somewhat on how to think. These people "gain value" in time the longer they maintain their presense. It's funny how Alex Jones is most likely Bill Hicks with plastic surgery, is COINTELPRO, appeared in a movie, said that he was a Jew, and he even married a Jew, yet even the most discerning people still value the contributions that the Infowars team provide in spreading a level of awareness to others even about very important info from better sources although if they named those sources, he would lose viewers and might get blacklisted. The guest speakers are very noteworthy people that are merely using Jones to share their own ideas, ranging from Trump to Richard Stallman to David Duke, Lyndon LaRouche, even Texe Marrs and Leo Zagami although ALL of said people dislike Alex Jones. Anyways, there's plenty of better people than Alex Jones out there that has a fairly competent understanding of geopolitics not too blinded by their own ideological purism that are old people oldfags. I am not said old people oldfags with a mind, but I picked their brains for a good seven years or so (but was awoken years prior) and still doing just that. There's people who's been on the internet longer than my current age, but again, experiences doesn't matter, for it is knowledge, wisdom, skill, good computer specs and a good internet connection that matters on the internet, and common sense is for sheeple. After 9/11, a whole bunch of normalfags fell for these rabbit holes and many had failed to see the real ones from the fakes, but fortunately, the collective internet consciousness had risen in the better spreading and gathering of information that was sown and harvested from those that invested in investigating what the sower had given some clues for people to look into that they share back to the harvester, which everyone became their own sower and harvester whether that be citizen science or citizen journalism, everybody contributed, remembered, and grown, looking both back in time and forward in the future through understanding current events and the history of all things behind everything that you can humanly gather at your own pacing. Cont.