>>39
Rhetoric itself is already compromised by having it being a set of things that are supposedly true and tested which many "fallacies" addresses which are not necessarily fallacies yet it is actually ideological fallacies formed if one has a specific set of beliefs which demands a specific taboos, redefining "common sense" as a weapon against another specific set of beliefs. Therefore, there is no pure philosophy when nobody can agree with certain absolutes or the denial thereof to justify one's specific set of beliefs. My very advice will be used against me as logic itself already is corrupted against itself to deny itself improperly through dishonest people with an agenda. Me saying this is that my agenda is exposing the general concepts behind how concepts are formed in words that I understand which you may not.