>>2418
Oh please, I've discussed this for years. The "Christian Bible" is full of contradictions and focusing on the stuff that makes it look anti Pharisee, anti Israelite, or anti Judahite is to also ignore the pro Pharisee, pro Sadducee, pro Israelite, and pro Judahite nature of it. How is it pro Pharisee? By abandoning the Levitical priesthood. How is it pro Israelite? By Paul circumcising Timothy. How it is pro Judahite? Ignoring the fact that Jesus was a Judahite, Jesus had many disciples that were Judahites, went to Jerusalem to preach, had spoken against the Pharisees and the Judeans (citizens of the Kingdom of Judea/Judah) that trusts the Pharisees (and the Sadducees) but had embraced all that understood his message. Using Christianity to go against modern Jews (of whom are spiritual ancestors of the Judean cults that had abandoned their Levitical sacrificial laws for blood libel/child sacrifice) is also failing to realize that Christians can't do anything against a professing Christian that just so happened to be culturally a Jew, supporting Jews, making more Jewish families, and so on under a Christian disguise. Catholicism had made forced conversions of Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews but they weren't necessarily thorough conversions, mostly by name only, for those very same "conversos" had their own synagogues in their homes. In some places, they were forced to wear pointed hats to separate them from non Jews, mandated by the Catholic Church. Protestantism however, had gotten rid of racial profiling and segregation of Jews and had become more true to the teachings of the bible concerning how they treat the Jews. With that, the Jews had twisted and influenced how the bible should be interpreted, and now look at any modern sect of Christianity whether it be the Catholic Church, "Orthodox" Church, the various Protestant churches, even Baptist churches, all of them have corruption from within, all of them always fighting about how to interpret the bible, so all of them can't be 100% right. The modern take on interpreting the bible is called "Evidentialism" which they insist that everything is self evident in the bible, that every cause has a prior cause to it, and that there is a primary/first cause. In any true form of ancient metaphysics, there never truly was a first cause to creation for it is all inseparably interwoven to each other as one as the many as one is the many and vice versa. Those that believe in an objective beginning to the universe have no objective proof whatsoever for they would have to had existed prior to existence itself which there simply is no objective way to prove it, while on the contrary, there's more proof that the universe has no true finite limit to it while it's in a perpetual state of creation and destruction. Black holes for example, eject matter (actually creates matter) as well as destroying matter, while they're in the center of every spiral galaxy The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation however, can't be used as "proof" for anything. See the second half of this https://youtube.com/watch?v=hhYsOQTfYEc [Embed] concerning the CMBR.

Anyone who really dislike the Jewish influence on society doesn't need to rely on the bible for criticism against them, for historical interactions and evidence alone is sufficient enough to make the claim that they're generally not trustworthy just as you can say the same for any other race that is indifferent to the laws of a foreign land would inevitably enforce their way of life into the inhabitants of the foreign land. It didn't work out for many primitive tribes that are pretty much extinct or are not like their ancestors at all. The Israelites and so also the Judahites had thousands of years of practice in decimating populations that they come in contact with, more brutal than any European empire for they had been the ones that destroyed the empires. They privy themselves as the destroyer of civilizations yet they don't know how to maintain civilization without external support.