>>773
Hmm, I don't think so, I am afraid. Do you mean like when you want to do some dupe filtering, say 'only show me things that are tagged 'blah' and are also exact matches' and such?

At the moment, the actual dupe system does not store search distances that pairs were found at. All that works in the discovery side, which works on a different search system and data structure than the dupe system proper and normal file searches.

If it helps, the likely next step for the dupe system for me is to write a checkbox or something for 'only show pixel-for-pixel-duplicates', as part of a push to early user-customisable auto-resolution rules. Once we can do the easier issue of pixel dupes, I expect the natural next step will be to add search info for very similar dupes (like 'if the files are 99.998% similar, follow these rules').