>>21358
>I'm for freedom of speech and opinion but this isn't even fall into either category.
agreed
this is pedos using a safespace for them at the expense of naive bernds safety

>>21360
>I don't care about any (really) content at all, but I imagine that there are people who care much more.
my argument here is that bernds who arent prepared to view the content are being forced to endure it and because the non-pedos do not take appropriate precautions around such stuff as they dont expect it, it feels strangely like these bernds are being used to hide the pedos traffic/exchanges. separating the two communities fixes that, as well as makes moderation easier as its in one place and it also impedes no ones ability to post whatever they want so i dont know why thats not even a possibility. fug, even allowing posts to be spoilered would solve the problem of bernd ending up with this shit in his cache.

my emotional argument which ive tried to leave outta this is that their content propagates the abuse of children. even many of the most innocuous of child model agencies is rife with molesters. this is a fact. and certainly some of them are used as ads for child trafficking freaks

>>21361
>Those mods are just gonna get themselves fucked over the moment anyone reports the site
given the lax laws of such content in liechtenstein, you may be wrong. in terms of the site itself, they do actually remove explicit content and thats where being reported could be bad for them. the exception is if some bernd gets fucked and this stuff is found in his computer. that would bring a lot of bad noise onto the site as well as the host.
>Even if it isn't illegal most hosts won't agree to host that kind of content
true, but im also not trying to destroy their site. if anything, i want to see its continued existence. i know better than to think that this pedo problem will get any better, especially after its clear that they have the mods graces. people complain about cuckchanners moving in swarms, but wew, pedos are way worse.