>>23935
>Yeah, that's the main point we're arguing about.
I was trying to make clear why I don't think God is a synonym for non-existence.

>Frankly, I can't prove one of these. Maybe you just pick one and see where it leads you.
Yes, it's not in the realm of science to prove because it isn't within the universe; all we can do is juxtapose the positions and see which seems about right.

>>23931
>Something may just occur from nothing spontaneously.
I'm familiar with this argument, and as said above, this isn't in the realm of science to disprove. Why I favor the existence of a God as to not is because I think it takes greater faith to believe that from nothing came something than that from something came something (video partially related).