>>32127
>I'm talking about the historicity of some events
No you and the author and the (((MSM))) make up shit.

>Whatever happened or didn't happened in America does not change the historicity
It demonstrate perfectly the false reporting.

Either there exist equal standards or allied claims and allegation are just victors "justice", a vendetta against the country that doesn't bow to (((anglo-american))) "order" AKA hegemony.

>Perhaps you're trying to make a moral equivalence, but that's not what I'm trying to show you.
Moral judgment are only allowed if it pleases you I understand.

>There is an objective definition for slave labor
There ain't.
It is just empty propaganda and massive fraud as the "slave labour compensation found" has show, where the Jewish initiators "compensated" itself. Similar happened in Poland were the blackmailed money was gambled away in currency speculation. What followed were demands that Germany should pay again.

What exist are traditional juridical definition of slavery since Roman times. By that long-standing definition there was never slavery in Germany.