>>35385
>Eastern Europe has so much history
There were as much epic struggles, dramas, and tragedies like everywhere else. But probably as we go back in time they will become less and less well documented especially compared to Western Euro happenings. Völkerwanderung is a great mystery for example.

Well I could write episodes of Polish-Hungarian friendship, about the threads the two country tied together with. The day I think is just an agreement. Some importance it has but I'm not sure what past event it commemorates.
>history post
I'm not sure how historical what I write, I'm working from primary and secondary sources (or in case of articles they can be tertiary basically) and sometimes I try to seek a consensus, sometimes I put those ideas forward which I feel right or more interesting or less discussed (I liek alternative explanations and I try to leave the more fantastic behind and make the rest agree somehow with the more accepted and established), and sometimes I filter things through my own interpretation like here >>35367 in case of that list or routs and when I return to that list for a comment - I've never seen it drafted or worded like that but for me it makes sense in my explanation the easiest.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not writing bs here, if you check out the topics (eg. in Wikipedia) you'll find the factual conformity. What could be different is the conclusions, which even historians like to sell theirs as facts and it's even more frequent that a historian arrives to a conclusion - or a hypothesis - and the next one uses that as a fact to build his own onto that, and sometimes they use a conclusion - or hypothesis - so many times in this fashion that all will think it's a non-disputable fact. And it becomes a historical dogma noone dares to question..