>>40366
>scholasticism
>Wasnt that quite opposite of rennesaince values?
>Scientific thought is not created in scholastic era.
Scholasticism gave birth to universities, which led to scientific thought.
Yes, renaissance went opposite. Went backwards actually, it was a regression compared where they were at (when renaissance arrived unis were already a thing and going). It's customary to blame the "Dark Ages" for the lack of scientific progression, but the truth is the antiquity was already stagnant, and couldn't step forward (they did basically nothing new just made compilations of older thinkers).
I might reply to other stuff tomorrow, this caught my eye first.