Bernd
09/30/2020 (Wed) 04:40:42
No.40369
del
09/30/2020 (Wed) 04:40:42
No.40369
del
>>40366
>The warrior caste is actually is more about keeping those peasants in check hence whole economy is stagnant, land based so it's more stability based rather than profit.
Actually the opposite could easily be argued for. The feudal era was the most unstable and the peasant were the most unruly. The HRE is a good example of this, frequently a knight or a Bishop would try to raise taxes or levy soldiers and frequently the peasants and burghers would rise up against this. Everybody was fighting for there own interests back then and it was incredibly decentralised. The advancing of society also saw the advancing of control.
>The warrior caste is actually is more about keeping those peasants in check hence whole economy is stagnant, land based so it's more stability based rather than profit.
Actually the opposite could easily be argued for. The feudal era was the most unstable and the peasant were the most unruly. The HRE is a good example of this, frequently a knight or a Bishop would try to raise taxes or levy soldiers and frequently the peasants and burghers would rise up against this. Everybody was fighting for there own interests back then and it was incredibly decentralised. The advancing of society also saw the advancing of control.