>>45068
So this is for the seats in the Duma.
I like those systems which adjust the seat distribution to reflect the people's will better.
What's that pine tree with ~500 000 votes?
>Half of single-seats (vote for person, not party) in Moscow were won by non-government candidates after "paper" part of voting, but they all suddenly lost after electronic part.
It isn't suspicious at all, I wouldn't be concerned...

>>45071
>>45072
This I found dystopic. Imagine a future voting system where you tap on your phone and then you get automatic results with no possible way of knowing that how the whole society voted. You could be happy if your party/candidates won, it would be like a lottery or some shit.
Even worse, just by these descriptions you guys gave, the logic and the structure of system itself - and its safety guards guaranteeing its cleanness - would be so impenetrable by everyone but the few designers, people could only do just believe it's doing its job fair and square, without any tampering.
People would be detached from governance entirely. There would be some talking heads in the media, introduced as opposing politicians, and people would get some data they can't validate, issues they can disagree on with each other, and a button they can tap on frantically. Wait we are already having this, minus the button.
>oracle
Exactly.