>>45180
I already told you I have not... But if you had read the list of the errors you posted then you would understand my point.

There are many reasons that they can't. It changes the whole story. Writing a story about the human factor of a siege and the lives of the little people is fine but that is a different story and clearly not one he was aiming to tell. I found the book you suggested in English so I might buy it at some point.

>Great many things related to women could have fit.
It changes the whole nature of it so it would have changed the different story, again, yes he could have but it would have made it a different kind of story and not the one he was wanting to write.

>The whole literature is full of women.
And there are whole genres that solely have women(Slice of Life for example) there is nothing wrong with having all women or no women, it's all dependent on what the author is wanting to write and the story he wants to tell. Many old books have very few women that play quite minor roles like The Water Margin, Outlaws of the Marsh Of the 108 Heroes I think 2 of them are women, one just being the wife of another hero and the Other actually does fight but only in one brief mention and then she gets married off to another hero, usually women are portrayed quite badly in that book.

>Fugging epic of Gilgamesh - which is also a tale of a great friendship - starts with him fornicating with all the women of the land.
But are they named and important though? They don't sound like it(I don't remember I have read it but I probably read a more tamer version as I don't think that part was in it).

>But read the books of Maurice Druon for example. He writes interesting female characters. Nothing in his books are romcom or eromanga.
There is nothing wrong with that, I'm not saying that nobody can write female characters if they want to, they can do what they want and make the story they want.