>>45820
It's difference of view on what is illegal.
On Kohl what's not literally illegal without the context the images paired with, they leave it up. So no actual cp can be found.
But they leave up images what are legal and normal in "normal" circumstances, just pics you could find via google if you'd type "kids". What they don't calculate with that imageboards aren't "normal" places and just about anything can turn into sexual content. If a law enforcement officer would open up Kohl and would see a hueg ass thread filled with kids up to the brim, the first thing would he think: "wow, such a convenient place to hunt sexual predators".
This is how Josh worded the issue in 9chan's ToS:
> 1. Child pornography.
> Do not post child pornography (18 U.S. Code § 2251). Due to the context of this website, any pictures of children - including those which are otherwise decent and legal - inherently fail the Dost standard and will not be permitted (United States v. Dost).
Ofc it was argued by kiddie posters if this Dost test thing should be considered serious or not.

Anyway, quite a few chans take it seriously, us here too, and are willing to enforce such rules that prohibits posting that content.
In a way places like Kohl, or various chans of Pachouli are convenient "containment" boards for this.
Those posters could spam us all day, a couple did too some time ago, but maybe it got boring to them, and they are fine posting at their usual places.