Bernd
06/16/2022 (Thu) 09:05:57
No.47978
del
06/16/2022 (Thu) 09:05:57
No.47978
del
>>47976
Maybe it's an advanced threat detection system or it's something to do with the drone, maybe the drone can designate a target behind an object and the gun will automatically track it as if it could see it so that when the tank or the target go around the object it can shoot instantly.
>What the other two does?
One is the commander and the other is the gunner.
>They say their workstations have redundancies so they can do whatever, and plans for future upgrades for the turret. Which tells me that instead of giving an automated tank, they rushed the development so they can show something in these times of war
If all workstations can operate every other part of the tank then they should be able to operate the tank with no men in the turret to begin with. They are probably referring to the practicality of it, those two operators in the turret would be severely overworked that way so maybe they are developing ways to lessen the work load with automation(like advanced systems that can track threats and automatically aim the gun and just need somebody to authorize the shot, or automated driving or something) or they are working on a way that the two men in the turret can operate the tank without even being in the tank.
Maybe it's an advanced threat detection system or it's something to do with the drone, maybe the drone can designate a target behind an object and the gun will automatically track it as if it could see it so that when the tank or the target go around the object it can shoot instantly.
>What the other two does?
One is the commander and the other is the gunner.
>They say their workstations have redundancies so they can do whatever, and plans for future upgrades for the turret. Which tells me that instead of giving an automated tank, they rushed the development so they can show something in these times of war
If all workstations can operate every other part of the tank then they should be able to operate the tank with no men in the turret to begin with. They are probably referring to the practicality of it, those two operators in the turret would be severely overworked that way so maybe they are developing ways to lessen the work load with automation(like advanced systems that can track threats and automatically aim the gun and just need somebody to authorize the shot, or automated driving or something) or they are working on a way that the two men in the turret can operate the tank without even being in the tank.