lamer
03/12/2021 (Fri) 05:46:17
No.524
del
>However, nonexclusive licenses are revocable (meaning the copyright owner can revoke the license at any time) in the absence of consideration. >https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/creating-written-contract-transfer-or-license-rights-under-copyright> [...] The most plausible assumption is that a developer who releases > code under the GPL may terminate GPL rights, probably at will.> --David McGowan, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School:>p278 "Notice that in a copyright dispute over a bare license, the>plaintiff will almost certainly be the copyright owner. If a licensee>were foolish enough to sue to enforce the terms and conditions of the>license, the licensor can simply revoke the bare license, thus ending>the dispute. Remeber that a bare license in the absence of an interest>is revocable.">--Lawrence Rosen>https://www.amazon.com/Open-Source-Licensing-Software-Intellectual/dp/013148787