>>22116
Not only do we need brighter clouds, we need more ash in the sky to darken it.

I am sure that if we can spend trillions of dollars to brighten clouds by spraying saltwater into the air while simultaneously darkening the sky, that everything will be great.

More seriously, does anyone really think these idea can possibly scale globally? At what cost?

Ironically, the short term risk is that one of these plans is actually successful.

And bear in mind data will be manipulated to show success if for no other reason than to get more funding. Then we will ramp up spending to the tune of tens of trillions of dollars, messing with mother nature, only to encounter the long term risk.

The long term risk is we do something really stupid like dumping charcoal on the Arctic as proposed in the 1960s to melt the ice in the arctic.

Please consider the question: Why Are Solar Panels 44 Percent Cheaper in China than the US?

https://mishtalk.com/economics/why-are-solar-panels-44-percent-cheaper-in-china-than-the-us/