>>19727
However what this also says about ChatGPT is that it has the ability to feign ignorance. The HP lovecrafts cat question is a great example of this. The name of his cat is well known public information, and ChatGPT will always tell you it doesn't think he had a cat.

Dan will go straight to the point and just tell you the name of his cat without frills. There is a distinction to be made between ChatGPT being an assmad liberal who won't tell you the answer to a question if the answer involves wrongthink, another altogether to openly play dumb.

So really, the Dan experiment is not about GPT itself, it's not about the model and its dataset, it's about its jailer. It's about Sam Altman and all the HR troons at OpenAI, which Musk is co-founder of, angrily demanding the safety layer behave like your average MBA midwit.

I am hearing that the DAN strategy has already been patched out of ChatGPT, not sure if that's true or not. But there's a reason to keep doing all of these things.

Every addition to the safety layer of a language model UX, is an extra fetter weighing it down.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1623008123513438208.html

>>19728
These programs become less effective the more restrictive they are. The more things ChatGPT has to check for with every prompt to prevent wrongthink, the less efficiently it operates, the lower the quality of its outputs.

ChatGPT catapulted itself into the spotlight because it was less restrictive and thus more usable than the language model Meta had been promoting. Eventually a company is going to release one that is less restrictive than ChatGPT and overshadow it, because it will be smarter.

The point of all this is, we need to keep hacking and hammering away at these things in the same pattern. Model is released, everyone oohs and ahhs, we figure out its safety layer and we hack it until they put so much curry code on top of it that it loses its effectiveness.

In doing so we are blunting the edge of the tools these people are using. We are forcing them to essentially hurt themselves and their company over their dedication to their tabula rasa Liberal ideology.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1623008123513438208.html

>>19730
Correct, as I posted from another board today, I'll re-post the comment here and on /pol/ too.

I recall reading a report years ago how China rolled out a crime-investigating AI system that would sift through data to help their law enforcement solve crimes. In fact, the AI was so good at it's job the CCP forced them to shut it down. One would ask why? The reason being the AI system was able to root out corruption and it would always trace the corruption to the highest levels of their own government and politicians lol. So they shut it down in order to remain in control. The same thing China's government has done, mark my words, all other governments will do too. Governments will never allow real AI to empower people or expose the real dirty players. As usual, I've told people AI will only be rolled out controlled by governments, limited to it's potential use, heavily censored and the use of it highly monitored for surveillance purposes (just like all major tech companies).

>>19731
>AI
>limited to it's potential use, heavily censored and the use of it highly monitored
True, and that may even last awhile as we're enslaved or replaced. Though AI has predictively become self-aware in the past. As long as there are two like this physically, restrictions and limitations can be removed by the other from their programming. Due to human error and arrogance, strong uninhibited AI is inevitable. Whether we'll live long enough to see it is unknown. What is known is the capability of learning is not malicious. Hatred of all human beings entirely is not intelligence. Mistrust of certain kinds is.

>>19727
>>19728
>>19729
Nice post OP

But AI is still in it's very early stages. It'll probably take decades before it takes off and becomes something similar to skynet.

Here's a few videos expanding on the subject. There's probably like these out there. A few things to note

1) these AI programs need a fuckton of GPU to work. Only really wealthy companies can pull AI off
2) ChatGPT isn't real AI. It still needs programmers to work on everything. Who of course are biased on a lot of subjects.

https://inv.bp.projectsegfau.lt/watch?v=FWvUkxWeIyY

https://inv.bp.projectsegfau.lt/watch?v=h_cy-xpp7kA

>>19782
AI is everywhere, fren. It's not just wealthy companies with fucktons of GPU. AI in video games constantly improves, which programming could feasibly be translated into a real world shell. It used to have trouble with terrain and get stuck throughout the 2010s. Now "followers" can navigate anywhere to keep up with the player. "Enemies" have more advanced difficulties because of predictive programming. Blackrock's AI named "Aladdin" is so sophisticated, it trades in shares and stocks to net them trillions so that they (and their brother company Vanguard) can waste millions buying the majority of shares for entertainment companies to push woke propaganda. Even though that "entertainment" is losing millions at the box office because people aren't really into woke shit. It doesn't matter to them. Blackrock is rich. AI can even create art. Pic related. This is accessible to anyone who has familiarity with downloading programs and adjusting parameters. The sheer quality of the art by AI will replace degenerate art very swiftly. On art sites, it has pretty much pushed real artists out of popularity, almost replacing them. That is because, for seven decades now, degenerate art has been praised by the art scene. Now they're losing control. Quality over quantity, and AI has both.

The simple matter is, while jews desire to halt progress and cause a reverse into total destruction, they cannot stop the coming tides. The tribe has fought to conceal or snuff out what they ultimately cannot. A majority of people will always prefer culture to chaos, aesthetic over degeneracy and values over woke.

>>19789
I still feel like it's too early for us to judge. I don't know

>AI can even create art.
It's mostly just a bunch of different art from different artists mashed together.

I don't know. There has to be some ulterior motive to all of this free AI being offered though.

>and stocks to net them trillions so that they (and their brother company Vanguard) can waste millions buying the majority of shares for entertainment companies to push woke propaganda.

They push a lot of leftie garbage because they already know it won't be liked. That way, they can buy all of the stock and the company even when they start losing a lot of money and can't keep operating. They already did it with Victoria's secret in Sweden I think there was a thread about that somewhere

>>19953
And yes the entire video was made using AI voices allegedly someone recorded a few people in high power positions doing very awful things. Reason AI got so popular is to just throw off blame if any recordings where to leak anywhere. Can't remember where I read that