>>2317
>>2319
Great argument guys. If you guys want to discuss seriously, just stop the memes for a moment. I'll be waiting... but I'm sure not everyone is willing to discuss serious things like this, as an adult and without all the idiocity that people teach you when you are a kid/teenager.


[just to refine my comment above: the argument "some ages are too young to have some sexual activity." is valid to me. For example, there's no way to a children without proper speech consent the sexual act, because they can't even express themselves. Some ages also would be inherently coersive since any pernetration less than, say, <5yo will cause some physical damage. In these specific cases, I *do not* support the relationship]